Daemon Sophic
Avatar in flux
Yes.Now it is "IF"
That’s what the Mueller investigation is about.
Now. Did you follow the rest of my post?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Yes.Now it is "IF"
The second paragraph of your post is just ranting, and in the name of goodwill, I am ignoring it.
Yes.
That’s what the Mueller investigation is about.
Now. Did you follow the rest of my post?
I don’t understand the Jesus reference.
Hmmm. Sounds like a very poor example. While censorship is generally a very bad idea, what would be better is marking sources as reliable or not, and having a strong fact-checking group for all "news" agencies; to immediately take down blatant lies, and with severe penalties for networks that are selling propaganda.I was making a joke about a facebook ad/meme that was attributed to supposed Russian trolls, it was a picture of
Jesus and Satan arm wrestling. the caption read
"click Jesus if you want Trump to win" apparently depending on the day you could click Jesus if you wanted Hillary to win and this was held up as proof of Russia undermining U.S. democracy. If I didn't see the hearing I would have thought it was a joke but shortly after a high ranking military officer was pushing for blocking RT news in the U.S. Do you see how this Russophobia is being used as a justification for censorship?
Hmmm. Sounds like a very poor example. While censorship is generally a very bad idea, what would be better is marking sources as reliable or not, and having a strong fact-checking group for all "news" agencies; to immediately take down blatant lies, and with severe penalties for networks that are selling propaganda.
Trump is being investigated for multiple other types of crimes as well. He's being looked at for campaign law violations, money laundering, emoluments violations, bank fraud, tax evasion, obstruction of justice, and insurance fraud come to mind.
Source?
Schiff being on an 'Intelligence' anything should qualify for the "Oxymoron Award of the Week".
the Dems hung their hats on the 'collusion' charge from the get-go. If this is a bust, then anything they might bring up in the future would have to have a smoking cannon to be believable.
This thread is about the alleged Russian collusion and Schiff's pronouncements that there was plenty of evidence and then his retraction.
The endless investigations are/were expected and if all the current investigations fail to come to anything I am sure there will be another, perhaps that Trump passed gas while playing golf?
The democrats lost in a free and fair election
. Campaign law violations have been supported Cohen's testimony.
Really?Tax evasion is pretty much a given considering how Trump not only refused to present his taxes voluntarily...
Yeah I agree that it is risky especially if ignorant people get into it. And alternative could be some form of government committee populated by 40% 40% 20% mixture of Republicans Democrats and independents respectively.Yah all we need is the Ministry of "Truth" to determine what is fact or not controlled by government. Hilarious.
You do realize that the turned witness, is a mainstay in American courts since the country was founded. Right?Cohen perjured himself in front of Congress. No lawyer with any sense is going to use Cohen as a witness.
Yeah I agree that it is risky especially if ignorant people get into it.
And alternative could be some form of government committee populated by 40% 40% 20% mixture of Republicans Democrats and independents respectively.
Alternatively we could go back to the good all days of forcing all networks to allow dissenting voices to SHOW EVIDENCE of their point of view on every channel and every show.
You do realize that the turned witness, is a mainstay in American courts since the country was founded. Right?
His credibility was shot when his earlier lies (that did not serve Cohen but only served Trump) were revealed by evidence and other witnesses to be complete fabrications.
Contrariwise his most recent testimony is repeatedly backed up by evidence.
Yes; a courtroom must always be leery of a turned witness, but when their testimony is collaborated by hard evidence, then they can be readily believed.
If I recall correctly, Cohen's lie was about Trump doing nothing wrong.Cohen perjured himself in front of Congress. No lawyer with any sense is going to use Cohen as a witness.
If I recall correctly, Cohen's lie was about Trump doing nothing wrong.
So he lied about that. So does that mean Trump actually did do something wrong?
Hmmmm ....
The lie was about some thing. So if he lied about that thing, then that makes that thing true. Things are true, or they are false.That is the problem with a serial liar. No one will believe the liar when they are making a true statement. So evidence is required.
The lie was about some thing. So if he lied about that thing, then that makes that thing true.