• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Good Question

Bob the Unbeliever

Well-Known Member
Genesis 3:2-20

They were given an single order - "You can eat everything except from that tree"
It was not even a multiple choice questionnaire
Just one thing not to do and they flunked it.

They can think.
They spoke.
They were tempted by the serpent.
They fell for it.
And here we are.

*yawn*

Bootstrapping Logical Fallacy: Use of the CLAIM to try to argue the CLAIM.
 

Bob the Unbeliever

Well-Known Member
View attachment 27302

1) You utterly failed to show that your god even exists. Romans 1:19

2) Even if a god exists, you failed to who the bible is it's book. Jeremiah 30:2

3) You completely fail to show the Universe was, in fact, created in the first place Hebrews 1:2

4) You failed to show your CLAIM was true (bible) -- you cannot use your claim to "prove" your claim. John 17:17

Or would you rather believe this?
Source: Why the universe shouldn't exist at all (opinion) - CNN

"Why is there something, rather than nothing?" could be the oldest and deepest question in all of metaphysics. Long exclusively the province of philosophy, in recent years this question has become one that can be addressed by scientific methods. What's more, a new scientific advance has made it more likely that we will finally be able to answer this cosmic conundrum. This is a big deal, because the simplest scientific answer to that question is "We shouldn't exist at all."

-------------------------------------------------
If we shouldn't exist as they say
Why are we here? Hebrews 2:6

LOGICAL FALLACY: use of your CLAIM to "prove" your CLAIM.

Dismissed.
 

Bob the Unbeliever

Well-Known Member
Genesis 3:2-20

They were given an single order - "You can eat everything except from that tree".

So? They were described as Innocent. Completely devoid of Knowledge. They had yet to eat of the Tree Of Knowing.

They were, in short, 100% stupid. Blank minds, devoid of even ordinary thoughts.

But the REAL LESSON of Genesis?

KNOWLEDGE IS SIN. DO NOT LEARN ANYTHING NEW-- UPON PAIN OF REJECTION.
 

Bob the Unbeliever

Well-Known Member
I have quite a different perspective about that garden event

Adam and Eve didn't fail the test
they passed

and the garden having served it's purpose was dismantled

Interesting perspective. I do believe that is new, to me. Hmmmm....

Dammit, Jim-- now I gotta **think**.... I'm a Doctor, not a Thinker! :D
 

MJFlores

Well-Known Member
So? They were described as Innocent. Completely devoid of Knowledge. They had yet to eat of the Tree Of Knowing.

They were, in short, 100% stupid. Blank minds, devoid of even ordinary thoughts.

But the REAL LESSON of Genesis?

KNOWLEDGE IS SIN. DO NOT LEARN ANYTHING NEW-- UPON PAIN OF REJECTION.

Were they infants? No.
Were they minors? No.
Adam and Eve were matured, talking and thinking individuals when they were created.
They knew everything and aware of everything that was going on.
The only thing that they did not have were belly buttons.
 

Bob the Unbeliever

Well-Known Member
Were they infants? No.
Were they minors? No.
Adam and Eve were matured, talking and thinking individuals when they were created..

But. According to the Myth? THEY WERE DUMB AS POSTS. Utterly, and totally without knowledge of any sort.

Not having eaten of the Tree Of Knowing, you see. So they were as ignorant as toddlers...
They knew everything and aware of everything that was going on..

That's not what your bible says!
The only thing that they did not have were belly buttons.
LMAO!

That's not how they are painted....
 

MJFlores

Well-Known Member
But. According to the Myth? THEY WERE DUMB AS POSTS. Utterly, and totally without knowledge of any sort.

Not having eaten of the Tree Of Knowing, you see. So they were as ignorant as toddlers...


That's not what your bible says!

LMAO!

That's not how they are painted....

Why so serious?
Lighten up.
If we don't we would be grumpy old men in a couple of years.

It is true that Adam and Eve did not have belly buttons because they did not have umbilical cords.
If this is not true.
Which came first, the chimp or the egg?

chimpegg.jpg
 

Bob the Unbeliever

Well-Known Member
Why so serious?
Lighten up..
Well, I'd find things a lot more funny, if you bible-worshipers would quit trying to inject your bronze-age immoral book into Law. But there ya go.

If we don't we would be grumpy old men in a couple of years..

Too late for me... Save yourself! Don't get old!

...wait.... that's not an option, is it? Getting old appears to be a requirement. Says so, right here on the label.

*sigh*

Still.... I'd rater be getting old, than dead. That being the single alternative....

... so far. I, for one, would welcome being Uploaded into the Cloud as a digital mind. No more itchy backs, that due to a flaw in the design of arms, you cannot *quite* reach properly.

God: Creates humans as the Pinnacle of Creation.

But gives the ability to scratch all of your back....

.... to house cats. Whats up with that?
It is true that Adam and Eve did not have belly buttons because they did not have umbilical cords..

Well. If you are going to get technical? It was Adam and Steve-- because Steve would have been a clone of Adam, and have identical DNA.

So the very first Transsexual was Steve... And god did such an amazing job of it, that Steve's artifical womb actually worked.... !

If this is not true.
Which came first, the chimp or the egg?

View attachment 27332


Egg. That's easy: eggs evolved hundreds of millions of years before either Chickens or Apes. In fact? It seems that eggs go back to Chordata, a kind of worm-with-a-backbone, the precursor to fishes.

And we humans inherited egg-making from way back then. It's just that somewhere along the way, egg-laying gave way to placentas instead. Pity about Marsupials, though-- they not only don't lay eggs, they don't use placentas either. Wait... did I say "pity"? I meant to say BRILLIANT! No pain of childbirth!

God creates Humans as the Ultimate Creation...

... but gives the *best* method of live birth to ... Kangaroos?
 

MJFlores

Well-Known Member
Well, I'd find things a lot more funny, if you bible-worshipers would quit trying to inject your bronze-age immoral book into Law. But there ya go.



Too late for me... Save yourself! Don't get old!

...wait.... that's not an option, is it? Getting old appears to be a requirement. Says so, right here on the label.

*sigh*

Still.... I'd rater be getting old, than dead. That being the single alternative....

... so far. I, for one, would welcome being Uploaded into the Cloud as a digital mind. No more itchy backs, that due to a flaw in the design of arms, you cannot *quite* reach properly.

God: Creates humans as the Pinnacle of Creation.

But gives the ability to scratch all of your back....

.... to house cats. Whats up with that?


Well. If you are going to get technical? It was Adam and Steve-- because Steve would have been a clone of Adam, and have identical DNA.

So the very first Transsexual was Steve... And god did such an amazing job of it, that Steve's artifical womb actually worked.... !




Egg. That's easy: eggs evolved hundreds of millions of years before either Chickens or Apes. In fact? It seems that eggs go back to Chordata, a kind of worm-with-a-backbone, the precursor to fishes.

And we humans inherited egg-making from way back then. It's just that somewhere along the way, egg-laying gave way to placentas instead. Pity about Marsupials, though-- they not only don't lay eggs, they don't use placentas either. Wait... did I say "pity"? I meant to say BRILLIANT! No pain of childbirth!

God creates Humans as the Ultimate Creation...

... but gives the *best* method of live birth to ... Kangaroos?

I have a lot of grey hairs on my head that I am mistaken for a senior citizen and people would often offer me to line up on the priority lane for pregnant women, people with disabilities and senior citizens. :cool:

Anyho as people would say "Hold on to your ticket, you don't know when you're gonna win."
I'm not a bible thumping person and I hate to be serious all the time.

I don't dig the Primordial soup and the Evo thing - millions and millions of years, simply because simple life [not the former TV series of Paris Hilton and Nicole Richie] could not just present itself and change itself into complex organisms like humans with 5 race divisions, 8.7 million land species, 391,000 plant species, 10,000 bird species and 34,000 fish species on the planet, unless someone so wise, so powerful created all of these.

An amoeba wouldn't exist if no one would trigger it's existence. NASA has sent probes to Mars [which is within the Goldilocks zone] looking and searching for evidence of extinct life and did not find any. ESA would be the next to try its luck.

Life couldn't exist by itself.
It would take someone with life to give life.
That is common sense.
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
What is "spirit"? You mention it as if it's self-referential, but clearly, it's not.

You need to show this "spirit" is a real thing, and not just wishful thinking.
cause and effect.....

if substance is not 'self' propagating.....not 'self' creating....
then
Spirit first
 

Bob the Unbeliever

Well-Known Member
I have a lot of grey hairs on my head that I am mistaken for a senior citizen and people would often offer me to line up on the priority lane for pregnant women, people with disabilities and senior citizens. :cool:

Anyho as people would say "Hold on to your ticket, you don't know when you're gonna win."
I'm not a bible thumping person and I hate to be serious all the time.

I don't dig the Primordial soup and the Evo thing - millions and millions of years, simply because simple life [not the former TV series of Paris Hilton and Nicole Richie] could not just present itself and change itself into complex organisms like humans with 5 race divisions, 8.7 million land species, 391,000 plant species, 10,000 bird species and 34,000 fish species on the planet, unless someone so wise, so powerful created all of these.

An amoeba wouldn't exist if no one would trigger it's existence. NASA has sent probes to Mars [which is within the Goldilocks zone] looking and searching for evidence of extinct life and did not find any. ESA would be the next to try its luck.

Life couldn't exist by itself.
It would take someone with life to give life.
That is common sense.

Argument From Incredulity Logical Fallacy. Oh well-- science is Hard. Goddidit is easy.

And? We have examined a teensy fraction of Mars-- your claim is akin to dipping a single glass into the ocean, looking in there, and exclaiming: "The oceans must be barren-- I see nothing".

Finally? It wasn't merely millions of years-- it was over 3 billion years. That's a darn long time, if there actually was a god driving the process, as you claim here.

Humans went from Wolves to Chihuahuas in a mere thousand years or so--because they were driving the process.

If there is a god behind Evolution? Why did it take so long?
 

MJFlores

Well-Known Member
we are all dust.....

our mothers ate for two
all that was consumed came up from the ground
we continue that consumption

and to the ground we are condemned

Yup, reminds me of Kansas


I close my eyes, only for a moment, and the moment's gone
All my dreams pass before my eyes, a curiosity
Dust in the wind
All they are is dust in the wind
Same old song, just a drop of water in an endless sea
All we do crumbles to the ground though we refuse to see
Dust in the wind
All we are is dust in the wind
Oh, ho, ho
Now, don't hang on, nothing lasts forever but the earth and sky
It slips away
And all your money won't another minute buy
Dust in the wind
All we are is dust in the wind
All we are is dust in the wind
Dust in the wind
Everything is dust in the wind
Everything is dust in the wind
The wind

Songwriters: Kerry Livgren / Kerry A Livgren
Dust in the Wind lyrics © Sony/ATV Music Publishing LLC
 

MJFlores

Well-Known Member
Argument From Incredulity Logical Fallacy. Oh well-- science is Hard. Goddidit is easy.

And? We have examined a teensy fraction of Mars-- your claim is akin to dipping a single glass into the ocean, looking in there, and exclaiming: "The oceans must be barren-- I see nothing".

Finally? It wasn't merely millions of years-- it was over 3 billion years. That's a darn long time, if there actually was a god driving the process, as you claim here.

Humans went from Wolves to Chihuahuas in a mere thousand years or so--because they were driving the process.

If there is a god behind Evolution? Why did it take so long?

3 Billion years....that long?
Matter and anti-matter cannot just pop up by itself
Unless of course, somebody did it, don't you think?
Somebody who could finish everything in less than a week.
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
Yup, reminds me of Kansas


I close my eyes, only for a moment, and the moment's gone
All my dreams pass before my eyes, a curiosity
Dust in the wind
All they are is dust in the wind
Same old song, just a drop of water in an endless sea
All we do crumbles to the ground though we refuse to see
Dust in the wind
All we are is dust in the wind
Oh, ho, ho
Now, don't hang on, nothing lasts forever but the earth and sky
It slips away
And all your money won't another minute buy
Dust in the wind
All we are is dust in the wind
All we are is dust in the wind
Dust in the wind
Everything is dust in the wind
Everything is dust in the wind
The wind

Songwriters: Kerry Livgren / Kerry A Livgren
Dust in the Wind lyrics © Sony/ATV Music Publishing LLC
memories .....that came out when I was sooooooo much younger
and could still hit that high note
 
Top