1) You utterly failed to show that your god even exists.
2) Even if a god exists, you failed to who the bible is it's book.
3) You completely fail to show the Universe was, in fact, created in the first place
4) You failed to show your CLAIM was true (bible) -- you cannot use your claim to "prove" your claim.
That's just 4 Logical Fallacies from your first sentence, above. I have no idea how many more Logcial Fallacies you included with the rest of your post-- which I did not bother with.
Seeing as how you began with a blatant fallacy in line 1.
1) You utterly failed to show that your god even exists.
Romans 1:19
2) Even if a god exists, you failed
to who the bible is it's book.
Jeremiah 30:2
3) You completely fail to show the Universe was, in fact, created in the first place
Hebrews 1:2
4) You failed to show your CLAIM was true (bible) -- you cannot use your
claim to "prove" your claim.
John 17:17
Or would you rather believe this?
Source:
Why the universe shouldn't exist at all (opinion) - CNN
"Why is there something, rather than nothing?" could be the oldest and deepest question in all of metaphysics. Long exclusively the province of philosophy, in recent years this question has become one that can be addressed by scientific methods. What's more, a new scientific advance has made it more likely that we will finally be able to answer this cosmic conundrum. This is a big deal, because the simplest scientific answer to that question is "We shouldn't exist at all."
-------------------------------------------------
If we shouldn't exist as they say
Why are we here?
Hebrews 2:6