Why do science hide the truth?

[shunyadragon]

That's only because you have no concept how or what things were like trillions and trillions of years ago.

There is no need in science for this knowledge.

 

[exchemist]

Do you not know, that people and their scientist have no understanding and knowledge as to what and how things were back trillions and trillions of years ago.

Can you, yourself exolexp exactly what happened back there?

Exolexp?

 

[Dan From Smithville]

....from someone who can't even spell the Ark of the Covenant and spells it as if it means an electric arc - might have known there would be another Jewish conspiracy theory behind it.

I gave up on the video after 4 minutes but I have found the script, here, so we can all see what it says: The Great Pyramid Of Giza: A Tesla-like Power Plant Built Thousands Of Years Ago? | Ancient Code

Whoever wrote this clearly has no knowledge of science at all. Granite a conductor? Limestone an insulator, but only if it is free from magnesium. Really? The Nile, flowing through aquifers, generated electricity (it is well known you risk electrocution if you visit limestone cave systems, right?) And hey presto, the pyramids must have been electricity generating plants!

This is almost beyond parody.

I live in a karst topography and have spent many hours in caves without one even giving a glow to my flashlight.

There has been a number of posts that indicate science is limited and cannot or will not provide a full picture and this is contrasted by videos like this. What is really being contrasted are science and the pseudoscience depicted in these videos. The videos can provide a full story, because it is made up and not based on evidence or a full understanding of the evidence that is provided. There is no basis provided on any sound scientific theory or a logical, rational assessment. It is conjecture and belief used to support continually more conjecture and belief. It is a house of cards.

 

[Polymath257]

Look the scientist tells you that.

But where does scientist speak about how things were trillions and trillions of years ago.

Again, why do you ask about trillions and trillions of years ago?

Why do you think *anything* happened trillions and trillions of years ago?

Why do you think it even makes sense to talk about 'trillions and trillions of years ago'?

 

[exchemist]

There is no need in science for this knowledge.

But how do you know? Were you there, trillions and trillions of years ago?

 

[shunyadragon]

Well seeing that doesn't explain exactly what things were like back trillions and trillions of years ago.

Can you, yourself explain exactly how things were back trillions and trillions of years ago.

There is no need to explain thng trillions of years ago sense time and space began ~4.5 billion years ago, The Quantum World our universe formed in does not have time.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

Because i do not belive we as human beings are the top of technology today, i belive that previous civilazations was more advanced then us. But i can not prove it since i do not have their technology

Why? On what basis is this belief? Is it faith?

What is the science that you do accept? What you have presented is not science.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

But how do you know? Were you there, trillions and trillions of years ago?

I do not know what was there trillions and trillions of years ago, but I heard it was the bomb. What a party.

 

[Polymath257]

There is no need to explain thng trillions of years ago sense time and space began ~4.5 billion years ago, The Quantum World our universe formed in does not have time.

13.7 billion, not 4.5 billion. The first is the age of the universe. The second, the age of the Earth.

 

[lostwanderingsoul]

Science deals with things they can see and touch and gather evidence about. Religion deals with things that cannot be seen or touched. Science is not hiding the truth but is only showing the truth based on things they can see and touch. Much of religion may or may not be true but science does not consider it because they cannot see or touch it.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

Why do I keep finding that those that are most critical of science know so little about science? I do not expect an answer, but it is something that is true no matter where I go.

There are numerous claims that are not part of science, but attributed to science.

1. Life arose out of nothing. Not a claim of science.
2. The origin of life and biological evolution are the same thing. Not found anywhere in science.
3. Evolutionists--whatever that may mean--claim that cultures do not develop from existing cultures and that more advanced cultures could not have existed in the past. This is not a claim of science and the theory of evolution is about the diversity and relationship of living things and changes that populations undergo and has nothing to do with cultural development at all.
4. I could go on and on with a list of claims by deniers and critics of science that abound on these forums and others. All of those claims are either completely or partly untrue. The really sad thing is that in this day and age of easily accessible information, the claimants could find this out for themselves.

 

[SkepticThinker]

First of all thank you for your answer

I can not prove the laser ofcourse and the video is not my production But i do tend to not belive much in mainstreem science that is true.

Why?

i am sure they do hide some truth from us, and many non mainstreem scientist has begun to understand this

Why?

 

[sayak83]

Well seeing that doesn't explain exactly what things were like back trillions and trillions of years ago.

Can you, yourself explain exactly how things were back trillions and trillions of years ago.

What exactly happened in New York Harbor on Feb 31st 2018?

 

[Dan From Smithville]

From those who own the power companies who earn millions of dollars on the technology of today

So you believe that ancient Egypt was built around a culture of free energy using rock as electrical conductors and an ancient mythical Jewish relic as a transformer/distributor? I wonder how they were to able to openly keep that a secret and how any reference to it was simultaneously deleted from human knowledge? You believe modern power companies owned by a mysterious elite have kept this information from humanity for 5,000 years?

Do you think Tesla had any idea that one day he and his work would be elevated to veneration by a cult-like group of followers that probably do not understand anything about the physics and science he employed?

 

[Dan From Smithville]

What exactly happened in New York Harbor on Feb 31st 2018?

Was that when the invisible Navy ship returned?

No. That was on the 30th.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

But how do you know? Were you there, trillions and trillions of years ago?

The real question is if man evolved from an ape-like ancestor how come there were monkeys there trillions and trillions of years ago.

 

[SkepticThinker]

Because i do not belive we as human beings are the top of technology today, i belive that previous civilazations was more advanced then us. But i can not prove it since i do not have their technology

Why do you believe this?

 

[SkepticThinker]

It's not that so much that science always hide truth.
It's because science can only go back so far. Then what ?

Let's take the big bang theory for example of scientist.
So what happened for this big bang to happen.
Scientists will say two planets or meteorites collided.
Ok so where did these planets and meteorites come from.

So something had to happen for them to exist, so where or how did they come from.

Therefore in everything that scientist will say, this happen because of this.
Ok, so where did that come from to make this happen.
And where did this come from so that would happen
And where did this come from to make this happen.
You see for everything scientist can say, I will ask to explain where it come from to make this happen.
And where did that come from to make this happen.

So you see eventually scientist are going to hit a brick wall, only because scientist can only go back so far and that's because they will be limited in their knowledge of what happened back trillions, trillion and trillion of years ago.
But yet the bible/scriptures goes back that far,

where scientist have no understanding or knowledge about what happened trillions and trillions of years ago.

As the bible/scriptures confirm's that God has no beginning, so that means God was trillions and trillions of years ago with no beginning.

As in the Bible/scriptures in the book of Genesis 1:1 professes. "In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.

As you can see, it doesn't say when God created the heavens and the earth only in the beginning, When ever that was.

Was it a thousand or Millions or Billions or trillions of years ago. In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth?
So when was the beginning ?

Who says that??

 

[exchemist]

Well foks, this thread has been a riot!

Who says that??

Ooh, somebody or other.......

Trillions and trillions of years ago.

 

[SkepticThinker]

Has I didn't make no mentioning of time, only that scientist are limited in their understanding and knowledge of what exactly happened trillions and trillions of years ago.

Huh? You keep saying "trillions and trillions of years." Where did you come up with that?