Kangaroo Feathers
Yea, it is written in the Book of Cyril...
What do you want to use young people in China for?I plan to use Euthanasia before Dementia, I hope.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
What do you want to use young people in China for?I plan to use Euthanasia before Dementia, I hope.
The amount of mercury in vaccines is miniscule. There's more mercury in tuna than in vaccines, for example. About 18 times less, in fact.The only valid exemption I could see is if someone is allergic or has a bad reaction to vaccines. Some vaccines are also dangerous to take. The flu vaccine for instance has mercury in it. The body over time cannot get rid of Mercury efficiently.
But the gov'ment stopping those gays from marrying, that's ok?What else do you believe the government should have authority to do to your children against your will?
Mercury USED to be in vaccines in a preservative caled Thimerosal. It WASN'T in the form of pure mercury, but part of a chemical compound. You know how chlorine is a deadly poison, and sodium is a deadly poison, but combined they make table salt? The mercury in vaccines was like that.The only valid exemption I could see is if someone is allergic or has a bad reaction to vaccines. Some vaccines are also dangerous to take. The flu vaccine for instance has mercury in it. The body over time cannot get rid of Mercury efficiently.
Not at all.I think they are pretty objective terms.
Not at all.
I condemn the practice of mutilating the genitals of newborn females and would consider it child abuse.
On the other hand, I condone the practice of circumcision for newborn males.
There are those who believe both practices are harmful and should be considered child abuse.
Which parents should drawn the line on which practice is harmful?
Well sure. That's because female genital mutilation destroys the body's ability to function normally (enjoy sex). Circumcision on the other hand is merely cosmetic. It is like getting a baby's ears pierced, which some cultures do.Not at all.
I condemn the practice of mutilating the genitals of newborn females and would consider it child abuse.
On the other hand, I condone the practice of circumcision for newborn males.
There are those who believe both practices are harmful and should be considered child abuse.
Which parents should drawn the line on which practice is harmful?
So, you would be the one making the decisions about which surgeries are necessary?Well sure. That's because female genital mutilation destroys the body's ability to function normally (enjoy sex). Circumcision on the other hand is merely cosmetic. It is like getting a baby's ears pierced, which some cultures do.
I'm pretty convinced that those who would outlaw all forms of circumcision are a little touched in the head. They are either bigotted against Muslims and Jews, or they are not reasoning well. Mostly the latter. So? I'm not going to allow laws to be dictated by irrational people.
Well I live in a democracy, so I vote just like all citizens vote for representatives, who then pass the laws.So, you would be the one making the decisions about which surgeries are necessary?
You would be the one placing judgments and labels on people for having a difference of opinion?
You would be the one to dictate that those who disagree are ignorant or bigoted?
You would be the authority on what is or is not rational?
So you would be the Fuhrer?
And you believe that all these decisions about how parents should raise their children should be up tot eh voters to decide and the government to enforce?Well I live in a democracy, so I vote just like all citizens vote for representatives, who then pass the laws.
And you believe that all these decisions about how parents should raise their children should be up tot eh voters to decide and the government to enforce?
No, it is NOT a case of *all* decisions being made by the government. But the government *does* have the right, indeed the responsibility, to ensure that parents provide minimal care to their children. That includes making sure the children are fed, clothed, and not abused, for example. I see no good reason why that minimal care should not include medical care, as defined by medical professionals.
Like forcing hormones into your prepubescent children if they believe they are members of the opposite sex?No, it is NOT a case of *all* decisions being made by the government. But the government *does* have the right, indeed the responsibility, to ensure that parents provide minimal care to their children. That includes making sure the children are fed, clothed, and not abused, for example. I see no good reason why that minimal care should not include medical care, as defined by medical professionals.
Does "the government" do that? Let alone without parental consent?Like forcing hormones into your prepubescent children if they believe they are members of the opposite sex?
If I'm not mistaken, you are in favor of the Government making decisions about whether or not a pregnant woman has the right to receive an abortion.And you believe that all these decisions about how parents should raise their children should be up tot eh voters to decide and the government to enforce?
Like forcing hormones into your prepubescent children if they believe they are members of the opposite sex?
Like forcing hormones into your prepubescent children if they believe they are members of the opposite sex?
Like forcing hormones into your prepubescent children if they believe they are members of the opposite sex?
If you had been following the discussion then you would know that I never made the claim that the government actually does this.Does "the government" do that? Let alone without parental consent?
You should just pay attention better.You'd have a citable example of something like that before making such an extreme claim, obviously?
I do believe that the governing body should do all within their power to prevent murder.If I'm not mistaken, you are in favor of the Government making decisions about whether or not a pregnant woman has the right to receive an abortion.
You bet wrong.Yet I'll bet you are OK with forcing prepubescent children into "rehabilitation centers" if they believe they are members of the opposite sex or are attracted to members of the same sex.
Then why'd you bring it up? Within the framework of commonly understood rhetoric, that certainly appeared to be what you were claiming. You now appear to be backpedaling, having been called on a claim you can't support.If you had been following the discussion then you would know that I never made the claim that the government actually does this.
I'm paying attention just fine, which is why I'm calling you on your claim about people doing and saying something that no one is either doing or advocating.You should just pay attention better.