BilliardsBall
Veteran Member
So are you ready to discuss the material you posted earlier?
Feel free to ask a specific question. I don't remember everything I've posted this month.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
So are you ready to discuss the material you posted earlier?
You stated: "Micro evolution is self evident, variation with a single kind of animal has many examples. Dogs, chickens, cat, cows and pigs are excellent examples of human driven micro evolution. There are over 300 modern dog breeds, but they are still all dogs. They haven’t transmogrified into cats."Feel free to ask a specific question. I don't remember everything I've posted this month.
Actually, you're not being Socratic. The Socratic method entails asking questions to the person making the claims. In this scenario, YOU are the one making claims, and then avoiding the questions of people attempting to investigate those claims.
Yeah, you're clearly not interested in having an actual discussion.I believe you've again made a claim regarding the nature of my claims, so I claim you are being self-contradictory here.
You are welcome to make a counter-claim to thwart my current claim that you are inconsistent and have a double standard, or should I put this as question, to be SOCRATIC?
Question: What comes after "check", mate?
Creationists will just say "this TYPE of evolution is fine and simply demonstrates that the creatures made way back during the time of Genesis have PASSED ON the ability for adaptation. This does not actually hurt creationists views at all."How do creationist explain this this video?
Creationists will just say "this TYPE of evolution is fine and simply demonstrates that the creatures made way back during the time of Genesis have PASSED ON the ability for adaptation. This does not actually hurt creationists views at all."
So your explanation is that they lie
They just look at it differently. Thats the problem with this creation evolution stuff most of it just depends on how you look at it therefore its a dead end.
They just look at it differently. Thats the problem with this creation evolution stuff most of it just depends on how you look at it therefore its a dead end.
Repeatable evidence such as the bacteria adapting to the antibiotic. Im sure they thank their ancestors for PASSING ON this trait. The vid is presented as a straw man argument like most " evidences".Not really. One side is supported by reliable repeatable evidence. The other side is not.
As you can see you look at it one way i look at it another. DEAD END.Not really. One side is supported by reliable repeatable evidence. The other side is not.
It appears that you have no clue as to what the evidence is or even what is or what is not evidence. You really should learn.. You can only ignorantly deny reality and claim that your God is a liar if you do not learn.Repeatable evidence such as the bacteria adapting to the antibiotic. Im sure they thank their ancestors for PASSING ON this trait. The vid is presented as a straw man argument like most " evidences".
I am having serious doubts about your user name.As you can see you look at it one way i look at it another. DEAD END.
I feel like your preprogrammed to say thatIt appears that you have no clue as to what the evidence is or even what is or what is not evidence. You really should learn.. You can only ignorantly deny reality and claim that your God is a liar if you do not learn.
Aren't you at all curious how you are calling God a liar?I feel like your preprogrammed to say that
Preprogammed ... how?I feel like your preprogrammed to say that