Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Needs a "Wow!" rating. Great video.How do creationist explain this this video?
How do creationist explain this this video?
I watched it. Just what do i need to explain?
May I assume you are a creationist and therefore do not believe in evolution?
I believe in MICRO evolution, not macro.
So, small changes WITHIN a kind, but no big changes where it goes from one kind to another.
So, elephants dont turn to lions. Lol
Creationists tend not to understand what macroevolution is and that It has been directly observed.I am familiar with the argument, it was common a few hundred years ago. The idea of "special acts of creation" as Darwin called them, but then how do you explain the presence of natural selection in the video?
I am familiar with the argument, it was common a few hundred years ago. The idea of "special acts of creation" as Darwin called them, but then how do you explain the presence of natural selection in the video?
Well, i believe natural selection happens. Natural selection is merely the most strong or fit for a given environment survive. Nature selects them to remain alive and selects OUT the weaker.
I seen a animal show one time. The lions wer hunting the goats. But, they could not catch the young goats, it was too much of a challenge. But, the weak old goat, the lion cought it and killed it.
Then the voice in the show says "the weak must die so the strong can survive".
Also, if i may add, the lions wer still lions and the goats wer still goats, despite one goat being selected out and the rest selected in.
You need to get better educated on evolution. I would recommend Aaron Ra.I believe in MICRO evolution, not macro.
So, small changes WITHIN a kind, but no big changes where it goes from one kind to another.
So, elephants dont turn to lions. Lol
Natural selection will preserve favorable variations while removing unfavorable variations. If this is true, then over time small changes will accumulate into large changes.
You need to get better educated on evolution. I would recommend Aaron Ra.
And of course natural selection is only half of the picture. Variation is very important too. Creationists like to claim that the needed genes already existed. If that was the case we would not see the stalling that Can be seen at boundaries. Nor would breakouts of occur at points. There might be slowing at the borders, but since the genes were supposedly there already we would see a uniform slowing, and a uniform advance.Natural selection will preserve favorable variations while removing unfavorable variations. If this is true, then over time small changes will accumulate into large changes.
So it may seam. But, we need to take into account the other part of the puzzle.....DNA (information blueprints).
We can only adapt and keep adapting to a limited point by what are DNA info allows.
The only way this aventual karge change could happen is if the blueprints got rewritten.
Aron Ra. Not Aaron. Though you may have the same spell checker I have. Its autowrong feature does not like certain words.You need to get better educated on evolution. I would recommend Aaron Ra.
The possible combinations of genetic code in even the simplest of lifeforms is mind boggling huge, and that does not even taken into account how the code is read, considering context matters to interpretation.
I believe in MICRO evolution, not macro.
So, small changes WITHIN a kind, but no big changes where it goes from one kind to another.
So, elephants dont turn to lions. Lol
Well clearly from the evidence big foot deos not exist.How do creationist explain this this video?
Did you ever hear of the Non Sequitur Show?Why not reccomend yourself to explain it since you understand so well?