Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Maybe huge numbers of Democratic voters suddenly decided the Senate race was not that important
Questions? Comments?
Why is it always Florida where these things happen? I remember that whole "hanging chad" fiasco in 2000. Now they're saying there might be something wrong with the machines or some kind of "calibration issue."
I think they should just go back to counting ballots by hand.
I remember that the ballots that gave them so much trouble were made under a commissioner in the Democratic Party. Who was in charge this time?Not just Florida. The same county in Florida. Broward was in the spotlight back then, too.
I remember that the ballots that gave them so much trouble were made under a commissioner in the Democratic Party. Who was in charge this time?
Why is it always Florida where these things happen? I remember that whole "hanging chad" fiasco in 2000. Now they're saying there might be something wrong with the machines or some kind of "calibration issue."
I think they should just go back to counting ballots by hand.
If they find those votes it could be enough to change that race at least. It won't flip the Senate, but if something breaks on Trump every vote could count.Both the governor's and the senate races could be up for recounts. Florida would probably still go Republican for both offices, but then again, maybe not.
Both the governor's and the senate races could be up for recounts. Florida would probably still go Republican for both offices, but then again, maybe not.
Every single election cycle, maybe there is something in the water.Why is it always Florida where these things happen?
Maybe that’s were the ballots are.Every single election cycle, maybe there is something in the water.
I remember that the ballots that gave them so much trouble were made under a commissioner in the Democratic Party. Who was in charge this time?
I didn't even imply that. It was a bit ironic that the Democrats were in control of an election that ended up going badly for them. Perhaps this time a Republican was in control and it will not go well for them. Al Gore led early and here the Republican is leading early. It would be a nice turnabout if that was the case this time.Republicans are just as bad as Democrats in every possible way. If you think otherwise you are delusional.
It is still Democrats. The commissioner [edit: I left up the term commissioner, but that is not the proper title, 'supervisor of elections' is] has previously opened ballots early, destroyed ballots during a period that was still open to challenge and recount, and this time around refused to announce how many ballots were received as she has constantly added to the total over the past two days.I didn't even imply that. It was a bit ironic that the Democrats were in control of an election that ended up going badly for them. Perhaps this time a Republican was in control and it will not go well for them. Al Gore led early and here the Republican is leading early. It would be a nice turnabout if that was the case this time.