The evidence is very clear. The only way for life to come from non life is if there is a greater power that can overcome the normal laws of science and create life from non life. That greater power is God. But because "science" does not want to admit there could be a greater power, they refuse to accept the idea of God.
I don't see how you arrive at this conclusion. Why can't the normal laws of science create life, and how does the fact that we haven't observed a fully formed organism pop into existence (which science isn't claiming), support a God hypothesis?
What actual evidence do we have for your God? What mechanism do you suppose this God used to form life?
I think you're arguing from incredulity.
You are absolutely right. No evidence has been posted to show that life came from non living material without the help of God.
Yes it has. We observe
components of life forming by natural means all the time. We know Earth was once lifeless, yet now has life,
ergo, life arose.
What isn't reasonable is to infer an invisible, magical cause with no actual evidence of its existence..
The only way living creatures could come from non living matter is by the work of a superior power which could bypass the laws of science.
This makes no sense at all. You're saying that because some phenomenon isn't fully understood it can only be explained by intentional, magical intervention, by something we have no evidence of.
At one time you could have made the same claim for earthquakes, tides, eclipses, &c. How is abiogenesis any different from these?