• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

A Question for Creationists

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Are you freaking kidding me,

There is no where in the Bible, that says, that anyone has to answer anyone's question, that is evil intended.
You show just how much you really don't know what the Bible Support's and confirm's.


And once again, you put a huge burden of proof upon yourself. If you can't prove an evil intent then you are breaking the Ninth Commandment. Of course all Christians tend to pick and choose which parts of the Bible they follow. For you that one verse is too inconvenient for you.
 

Faithofchristian

Well-Known Member
That verse does not give you an excuse for ignoring the one quoted. Please note that no one against your nonsense has "evil contentions". In fact that is a false accusation against others. A breaking of the Ninth Commandment. You are only digging a deeper hole for yourself.


1 Peter 3:12-16, most certainly does tell how to treat those with evil intentions.

All your doing is cherry picking out one verse, when in fact all the Verse's in
1 Peter chapter 3 all goes together.

And I still stand.with 1 Peter chapter 3.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Right now he isn't so much "cherry picking" as he is "outright fabricating". He is looking at a verse in the Bible that says "always give people reasons when asked, even if they intend evil" and saying what it actually means is "don't give people reasons when asked, especially if they are evil".

Now I think they've realized they're backed into a corner. It's not really fun any more...

It is always a sad awakening for a Christian when they find that most atheists understand the Bible better than they do.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
1 Peter 3:12-16, most certainly does tell how to treat those with evil intentions.

All your doing is cherry picking out one verse, when in fact all the Verse's in
1 Peter chapter 3 all goes together.

It really gives you no excuse at all. And besides that now you have to prove that the intentions of others are evil. You do not seem to understand either logic or the Bible.
 

Faithofchristian

Well-Known Member
It is always a sad awakening for a Christian when they find that most atheists understand the Bible better than they do.


Yeah, right. You have nothing, but alot of nonsense.
You could only wish you had.

If your claiming what I think your claiming, Then by all means, explain exactly the book of Revelation. Who and what are the Locust army. Who are they.
Explain in Revelation 13:10--"He that leads into captivity shall go into captivity"

What does this mean?
 
Last edited:

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Yeah, right. You have nothing, but alot of nonsense.
You could only wish you had.

Oh my!! More false witness against your neighbor. Losing a debate is no excuse for breaking the Ten Commandments. Perhaps if you actually understood the Bible you could do better.

You should realize that most Americans that are atheists used to be Christians. Many of them became atheists is due to a superior understanding of the Bible. There is a good reason that the Catholics used to ban the ownership of the Bible by those not under Church control.
 

Faithofchristian

Well-Known Member
Oh my!! More false witness against your neighbor. Losing a debate is no excuse for breaking the Ten Commandments. Perhaps if you actually understood the Bible you could do better.

You should realize that most Americans that are atheists used to be Christians. Many of them became atheists is due to a superior understanding of the Bible. There is a good reason that the Catholics used to ban the ownership of the Bible by those not under Church control.


Are you freaking kidding me, they were never Christians in the first place.
 

ImmortalFlame

Woke gremlin
Are you freaking kidding me,

There is no where in the Bible, that says, that anyone has to answer anyone's question, that is evil intended.
You show just how much you really don't know what the Bible Support's and confirm's.
Verse 15, But sanctify the Lord God in your hearts, and be ready always to give an answer to every man that asks you a reason of the hope that is in you with meekness and fear"
Verse 16, Having a good conscience, that, where as they speak evil of you, as of evildoers, they may be ashamed that falsely accuse your good conversation in Christ"
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Yeah, right. You have nothing, but alot of nonsense.
You could only wish you had.

If your claiming what I think your claiming, Then by all means, explain exactly the book of Revelation. Who and what are the Locust army. Who are they.
Explain in Revelation 13:10--"He that leads into captivity shall go into captivity"

What does this mean?

I think that Revelation was written by a rather mentally ill man. Much of it is nonsensical and self contradictory, which is why there are so many different interpretations among Christians.
 

Faithofchristian

Well-Known Member
Verse 15, But sanctify the Lord God in your hearts, and be ready always to give an answer to every man that asks you a reason of the hope that is in you with meekness and fear"
Verse 16, Having a good conscience, that, where as they speak evil of you, as of evildoers, they may be ashamed that falsely accuse your good conversation in Christ"

Seeing that you have no idea what those Verse's are saying. Go Figure again
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Seeing that you have no idea what those Verse's are saying. Go Figure again

He clearly understands that verse far better than you do. And he does not need to break the Ninth Commandment to excuse his behavior. By the way, the Ninth Commandment involves a lot more than merely lying about your fellow man. It appears that you do not understand that verse either.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Well you just proved my point. Thank you

Wrong again. I proved how ignorant you are about your own Bible. You can't explain Revelation. At best you can only refer to your own prejudices. Pointing out that the author of the book was truly nuts is an explanation.

You appear to be making the mistake of thinking that Revelation is "scripture".
 
Top