Unveiled Artist
Veteran Member
An interpretarion is given that does not reflect the intent of Baha'u'llah or of His Message, it reflects the intent of the poster.
Regards Tony
Is it invalid because it expresses the intent of the poster?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
An interpretarion is given that does not reflect the intent of Baha'u'llah or of His Message, it reflects the intent of the poster.
Regards Tony
We put our own ideas above Gods.
We become lovers of self by thinking all the good we do comes from our own human self.
Regards Tony
Doesn't every single post on here reflect the intent of the poster?Is it invalid because it expresses the intent of the poster?
Doesn't every single post on here reflect the intent of the poster?
Bahai is a color of the flower not the gardner that tends the garden. The garden exists because of individual flowers.
The garden isnt the key here. It doesnt exist separately as something "greater." Its just a label.
Bahauallah cannot define the nature of the label anymore than a christian. While its fine to believe we succeed more if we are a garden others know that we dont need a garden to plant healthy flowers.
Different perspective. To unify it or bring a new system, we all need to be on the same page. Unity is not diversity.
One truth. One progession. One god. Is not a diverse foundation. Even bahai scripture makes diversity (differences) secondary. I posted it for Tony, I think earlier.
It doesnt mean its morally wrong. To say youre right is not rude its just being hoest.
If I were a christian trinitarian, how would it benefit me to say my belief is false (or outdated), offering bahallah solution, then saying I can keep my belief but belittling it as colors and not the garden?
LH, I hope you've been careful to not 'add' beliefs that are contradictory to each other.
That's true for many religions, but is it true for the religions that actually want to be the one religion left on this planet, by means of conversion? If we all became evangelical Christians, for example, do you really think the world would be a better place? Wouldn't there still be lots of in-fighting?
Indeed we don't know for certain how old she was - its possible she may have been as young as six but there seems to be fairly clear evidence that she had not reached puberty when she was married - early Muslim scholars (not long after Muhammad's time) apparently went to some lengths to make it clear that although she was unquestionably (even by their standards) still a child at marriage, she had reached puberty (although she might still have been as young as 9 or 10) when the marriage was consummated. I don't think it is a great surprise that having been both indoctrinated and impregnated by the charismatic leader of a new and rapidly growing religion before reaching the teenage years, she found herself in exemplary 'submission' to the will of Allah. Do you? Culture aside, don't you think an actual "Manifestation of God" ought to have known better - even if it wasn't part of the revelation to the rest of humanity in that age?
Anyway, as usual, your apologetics miss the point which was not to condemn 7th century Arabic/Islamic culture but to illustrate that it is paradoxical (given Baha'i religious heritage) for a Baha'i to dismiss another religion on the grounds that its marriage customs seem a little off beam.
My humble understanding is for instance if everyone became a fairly sincere Saivite Hindu then the world would not be in need of any other religion. So it comes down to really how well the followers can carry out their teachings. But just about every religion has truth and enough to be able to solve all the worlds problems if the majority of their followers put it into practice.
That has been the problem all along not so much that the teachings are inadequate but the followers not living up to them. That includes us of course.
Were they really though? Do you really think that all the religions are wide enough in their scope to encompass the diversity of mankind? Perhaps the Bab didn't get around enough to see this diversity. Perhaps he was just looking at life in a 200 mile radius in Iran.
Many people, no matter which religion you pick to become universal, would have to change there ways rather dramatically. Don't you think it would have been much much easier just to accept faiths the way they are?
My humble understanding is for instance if everyone became a fairly sincere Saivite Hindu then the world would not be in need of any other religion. So it comes down to really how well the followers can carry out their teachings. But just about every religion has truth and enough to be able to solve all the worlds problems if the majority of their followers put it into practice.
That has been the problem all along not so much that the teachings are inadequate but the followers not living up to them. That includes us of course.
I don't think it'll ever happen that all the embodied souls all become one faith. We're just way too diverse for that. People have differing needs, and from the Hindu POV, are at different stages of the soul's evolution. Would a teacher teach the exact same class to all grades, K through 12?
I wouldn't wish Saivite Hinduism on anyone. It's way too demanding.
You have one foundation/god/elephant. By definition, the foundation cannot Also be hindu beliefs/christian beliefs/ the ear, eye, and trunk of the elephant.
If the latter, you have to believe more than one type of god while believing in god at the same time. The former, you can believe any of these things because they come from the same source.
Bahai believes the latter. I believe the former.
How are they both right?
Therefore our focus would be helping people follow their own teachings rather than a new system designed for diversity to follow a unified system contradicting half of our beliefs?
That's exactly the scenario that the elephant parable raises. We have all these different Faith communities with their contradictory beliefs that have been existing in relative isolation from each other because of geography and time. Yet we are increasingly brought into closer and closer association with each other despite our differences. We share the same ultimate reality whether it be in the phenomenal or unseen realm and so we are increasingly confronted with Faith adherents who hold apparently disparate worldviews yet live lives worthy of admiration. What seems clear to one eludes another. That is because we experience different aspects of the one reality symbolised by the elephant.
I think we would have to extricate ourselves from this system based upon materialism and consumerism or establish a spiritual one based on virtues if we want to help people follow their teachings. Under the current system people are being drawn away from religion.
Oh do you? Who brought marriage customs into the conversation? Anyway, you're right - let's get back on track...I think you are going nowhere with trying to attribute psychiatric causes to established religious leaders, including Baha'u'llah, so you are finding something else to have a poke at.
So what do you think about the Messianic claims of the Reverend Moon? So far we have established that you believe he was 'mistaken' and the only grounds you have given is that he thinks he is the only one that is (currently) right - although he traces his thought back through Jesus, Moses etc. - some of the very same "Great Beings" that Baha'u'llah followed after and believed that he was anointed to complete the 'unification' mission that Christ initiated 2000 years ago - something which Baha'u'llah also claimed. So the as-yet-unanswered question still remains. How could someone be so utterly 'mistaken' about their identity as a Messiah or Manifestation of God? How could the Rev. Moon think he was the Messiah when he was not? How could Muhammad fail to recognize that he was a divine Manifestation when - if Baha'u'llah is correct that is exactly what he was?We were pursuing your 'delusion' of religious leaders line of thought and you asked me about the Messianic claims of the Unification Church leader.
We are all under different spiritual systems that are separate truths "in and of themselves."
Under my current system, I am drawn to religion. I ask, though, how am I wrong? What behaviors like rape and crime applies to me that make me follow a religion leading me away from its "true" teachings Im blind of?
I don't view beliefs as true or false. They're just beliefs. I think this attitude reduces disagreement and emotion. Besides that,. I actually believe that there is no absolute true or false in beliefs.
You like Nissan, I like Toyota. So what? To spend energy on the dispute is, in my view, not productive, or conducive. It goes in circles, and leads nowhere. Better just to accept that difference as part of the Lord's dance and move on.
Would you want to endlessly argue with a spouse over your and her favorite restaurant (if they differed)?
Oh do you? Who brought marriage customs into the conversation? Anyway, you're right - let's get back on track...
So what do you think about the Messianic claims of the Reverend Moon? So far we have established that you believe he was 'mistaken' and the only grounds you have given is that he thinks he is the only one that is (currently) right - although he traces his thought back through Jesus, Moses etc. - some of the very same "Great Beings" that Baha'u'llah followed after and believed that he was anointed to complete the 'unification' mission that Christ initiated 2000 years ago - something which Baha'u'llah also claimed. So the as-yet-unanswered question still remains. How could someone be so utterly 'mistaken' about their identity as a Messiah or Manifestation of God? How could the Rev. Moon think he was the Messiah when he was not? How could Muhammad fail to recognize that he was a divine Manifestation when - if Baha'u'llah is correct that is exactly what he was?
If you are following your religion and drawn to it then that’s wonderful. The aim is to attract humanity towards spiritual and virtuous behavior.