• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Are you an atheist? if so, What is your POV about God?

psychoslice

Veteran Member
As much as I'm willing to try to share what my views are, the question of this thread is about those who embrace atheism, and what do they do know that the God they know of doesn't exist. I don't want to distract it with what I have done with that very question.
Why ?, maybe it would show why atheist think the way they do ?.
 

psychoslice

Veteran Member
There are two categories of atheist: those who have defined "god," and those who have not. Those who have not have no business forming an opinion about "god."
and you don't either, because you have no proof of what you are arguing about, so why even bring it up, you would be better to keep it to yourself, and save embarrassment.
 

Kapalika

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
Following a Post I wrote, I Heard the claim that Atheism is claiming there is No god,
I tried correcting the person and explaining him that Atheism is the lack of belief in a God.
Its not saying there is no God, rather saying you don't believe there is A god based on current evidence.

I Would love hearing Atheists POV on the matter..

I always find that to be a bunch of semantics used to appeal to theists who view atheism as dogmatic. I don't really see any fundamental or important difference between disbelieving in god and "lacking" belief. If I were to say "there isn't any god" it's implied that I'm saying that as matter of belief based on whatever reasons I might have (including skeptical or evidence based reasons).

Lacking a belief is implicit and I don't think you can implicitly be an atheist and still label yourself as one as it would move you to a more explicit position. Technically my cat is an atheist but who would ever say that?

I think many people who say they lack a belief in the manner that you do might be closer to agnosticism than atheism.
 

Kapalika

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
How about the prophesy of Daniel chapter 9, verse 25 stating 300 years before Christ the exact day that Christ would make his triumphant entry into the city of Jerusalem as King and Messiah? Oh wait, never mind that. I forgot that I was talking to someone who doesn't really care to know the truth.

My evidence of God is in me. It is not for you. I cannot give it to you. The evidence I have apparently isn't meant for you. If it was, you'd have your own evidence.

What about the evidence for Shiva?
 

Willamena

Just me
Premium Member
and you don't either, because you have no proof of what you are arguing about, so why even bring it up, you would be better to keep it to yourself, and save embarrassment.
"God" has been proved to me sufficiently for me to form an opinion.

You, however, lacked sufficient evidence about my status to form an opinion of it worthy of consideration.
 

psychoslice

Veteran Member
"God" has been proved to me sufficiently for me to form an opinion.

You, however, lacked sufficient evidence about my status to form an opinion of it worthy of consideration.
But can't you see that means nothing to anyone else, especially those who need proof ?.
 

Willamena

Just me
Premium Member
I always find that to be a bunch of semantics used to appeal to theists who view atheism as dogmatic. I don't really see any fundamental or important difference between disbelieving in god and "lacking" belief. If I were to say "there isn't any god" it's implied that I'm saying that as matter of belief based on whatever reasons I might have (including skeptical or evidence based reasons).

Lacking a belief is implicit and I don't think you can implicitly be an atheist and still label yourself as one as it would move you to a more explicit position. Technically my cat is an atheist but who would ever say that?

I think many people who say they lack a belief in the manner that you do might be closer to agnosticism than atheism.
I take an opposite stance: lacking belief is explicit, as explicit as believing is.

Re your cat, it would seem you inflate explicit with literal.
 
Top