You say ''Known'' this may be true but it does not make them the originators of the Ayuraveda , ...as I said Agnivesha founded on particular brance of Ayuraveda he did not autor it it was knowledge handed down from Brahma to Dhanvantari , ... therefore it is Revealed knowledge , ....thus its title Ayur 'VEDA' ......
There is no proof that it was magically revealed. And your view also demonstrates a lack of understanding of the concept of revelation.
Revelations are for subject matters that cannot be known through other means, such as observation, study and inference. Transcendental topics such as heaven, hell, soul, Vaikunta, Paramatma, etc., can only be known through revelation. Material subjects such as history, Math, Science, Astronomy and Medicine are known through worldly means and do not require to be revealed.
I have tried to emphasise and repeat this multiple times on multiple threads on this forum. Your approach of ignoring this important distinction and considering all kinds of knowledge to be revealed would require us to close down all the Labs, discontinue all research and try to find answers in the Puranas and other Smriti texts.It would take us back to 1000 AD and I am pretty sure that no Hare Krishna (including yourself) is willing to give up the medical facilities, the internet and the host of other other modern comforts they are used to and this seriously undermines your position.
Without the technology that has been developed in recent times (by scientists), Prabhupada would not have been in a position to travel to foreign countries and you would never have heard of Krishna. Don't you think it is ironical, that had your proposal been followed, you would never know the very system that has influenced you to think this way?
, ...Hippocrates although the father of western medicine is known to have taken great interest in Ayuravedic medicine as his contemporaries did in Vedic philosopies in general , ....amongst the greeks there was a huge respect for Vedic Wisdom .
I am sorry, but these are highly irresponsible and arrogant statements to make. You are belittling something that you have no knowledge of. There is not a single shred of evidence to support any claim that Hippocrates copied Indians. And please do not post random internet blogs to support these wild theories or quote conspiracy and cover-up stories by academia .