• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Why worship the biblical god?

Harrytic

Member
Pascal's Wager, a morally bankrupt point of view, completely devoid of integrity. Even if this God was real, I would not worship him.

Errr no. It's not Pascal's Wager. Pascal’s Wager is based on a presumption. Saying that if God exists, then you should worship him just to be on the safe side. Because if you’re right about his existence, you’re safe, but if you’re wrong you’ve lost nothing.

Your thread already takes the stance that God is real and that he is a cruel taskmaster who demands worship. I am telling you why I worship him and why you should if you truly believe in him. I am not working on a presumption but a firmly held belief that God is real.

You sound to me like that little kid in the school playground who brags that they can beat the bully, but when face to face with the bully they back down and cower. If you’re were face to face with God and he was about to put you through eternal suffering and you could see what was about to happen to you, you would be down on your knees quick fast. You’d be asking God which butt cheek he wants you to kiss first.
 

gnostic

The Lost One
shiranui117 said:
You will not find any such statement in the Bible. Hell is not a place. Hell is a negative reaction to God's Presence and love.

If we are to believe that some parts of Revelation are the end-of-the-world apocalypse prediction, then at some points in the future, only 144,000 people will be saved.

But that is only if you believe in the prophecies BS.
 

Harrytic

Member
You will not find any such statement in the Bible. Hell is not a place. Hell is a negative reaction to God's Presence and love. God doesn't "send" anyone to Hell, because 1: No one is in Hell until after the Final Judgement, and 2: Hell is not a place of punishment, but a state of rejecting God, yet suffering because we cannot escape from Him Who is everywhere present and filling all things.

There are lots of beliefs about what Hell is, You should perhaps put "I believe" before your statement, because that's your take on it. :) I see a scripture where Jesus quite clearly states he will have his angels cast you into Hell.

Matthew 13:40-42: "Just as the weeds are separated out and burned, so it will be at the end of the world. I, the Son of Man, will send my angels, and they will remove from my Kingdom everything that causes sin and all who do evil, and they will throw them into the furnace and burn them. There will be weeping and gnashing of teeth."

Clearly it's a literal place of punishment and YES Jesus is the one who is going to order his angels to hurl you in there, so he is the one sending you there.

Yes, that is my take on it and I could be wrong, but the bible seems to back me up.


He did not create a sinful humanity. We ourselves became sinful when we took our eyes off the truth, becoming selfish, desiring empty and vain things that are doomed to disappoint us and leave us unfulfilled in the end.
.

I applaud your attempt to absolve God of any responsibility, but he did create us with a rebellious nature, knowing full well before hand that Satan would come along and decieve us, but yet he stood by and allowed that to happen.

He only asks us to return His love for us

No one should ever expect another to love them. That's just wrong. Love comes naturally and involuntarily. You don't love someone just because they want you to.

The bible expects us to believe in him and acknowledge Christ's death on the cross and to FEAR him, but must we love him?

I just don't see why so many Christians try so hard to sugar coat God. God is who God is and we do our fellowman no favours by not being honest about our God.
 
Last edited:

Shiranui117

Pronounced Shee-ra-noo-ee
Premium Member
In god's eyes, we are all wicked and deserve to burn for eternity (or deserve to die - as there are christians and jews who don't believe in hell). If this was not true, the crucifixion would not be necessary. Jesus died as a scapegoat for all of humanity. For some reason, instead of just forgiving us, god needed all this to happen.
I'm sorry, but the ideas you put forth were invented in the 1100's by Anselm of Canterbury, and during the Reformation by John Calvin. They did not exist in the early days of Christianity. You can read summaries of these innovations below:
Satisfaction theory of atonement - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Penal substitution - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jesus died on the Cross to share fully in our human experience, and to conquer Death by His death, freeing mankind from the bonds of sin. This is the universal witness of the first Christians during the first thousand years of Christianity, and is still preserved perfectly in the Eastern traditions of Christianity today. You can read what is believed by hundreds of millions of Eastern Christians below:
Christus Victor - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Moral influence theory of atonement - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Ransom theory of atonement - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Recapitulation theory of atonement - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jesus' death and Resurrection do not save us from God; we don't need to be saved from God. We need to be saved from sin and death. And that is what Jesus saves us from.
 

Shiranui117

Pronounced Shee-ra-noo-ee
Premium Member
There are lots of beliefs about what Hell is, You should perhaps put "I believe" before your statement, because that's your take on it. :) I see a scripture where Jesus quite clearly states he will have his angels cast you into Hell.

Matthew 13:40-42: "Just as the weeds are separated out and burned, so it will be at the end of the world. I, the Son of Man, will send my angels, and they will remove from my Kingdom everything that causes sin and all who do evil, and they will throw them into the furnace and burn them. There will be weeping and gnashing of teeth."

Clearly it's a literal place of punishment and YES Jesus is the one who is going to order his angels to hurl you in there, so he is the one sending you there.

Yes, that is my take on it and I could be wrong, but the bible seems to back me up.
At first glance, yes.

What I have said of Hell is consistent with what St. Isaac of Syria (from the 600's) says:
. . . those who find themselves in hell will be chastised by the scourge of love. How cruel and bitter this torment of love will be! For those who understand that they have sinned against love, undergo no greater suffering than those produced by the most fearful tortures. The sorrow which takes hold of the heart, which has sinned against love, is more piercing than any other pain. It is not right to say that the sinners in hell are deprived of the love of God… But love acts in two ways, as suffering of the reproved, and as joy in the blessed!

But then we have to ask: What exactly IS that fire into which the damned are thrown? What is the worst possible thing to experience for those who have chosen to permanently seal off their hearts to God?

We see in Psalm 20:8-9 (I'm going off of the Septuagint rendering, BTW)
Let thy hand be found by all thine enemies: let thy right hand find all that hate thee. 9 Thou shalt make them as a fiery oven at the time of thy presence: the Lord shall trouble them in his anger, and fire shall devour them.

This clearly shows that God will make His enemies (those who hate Him) as a fiery oven.

And in 1 Corinthians 15:26-28, we see this:
26 The last enemy that will be destroyed is death. 27 For “He has put all things under His feet.”[a] But when He says “all things are put under Him,” it is evident that He who put all things under Him is excepted. 28 Now when all things are made subject to Him, then the Son Himself will also be subject to Him who put all things under Him, that God may be all in all.

God will be in all, yet God's presence will not be experienced as pain and suffering in those who are in Heaven, will it?

In Acts 3, we find our answer:
Repent therefore and be converted, that your sins may be blotted out, so that times of refreshing may come from the presence of the Lord, 20 and that He may send Jesus Christ, who was preached to you before,[a] 21 whom heaven must receive until the times of restoration of all things, which God has spoken by the mouth of all His holy prophets since the world began.

So no, God's Presence within the saved will not be experienced as Hell. Rather, the saved will experience His Presence as Heaven.

This is just an introduction to the idea, but I simply wanted to demonstrate how Scriptural the concept actually is. If you have more questions, I'd be happy to answer them.

I applaud your attempt to absolve God of any responsibility, but he did create us with a rebellious nature, knowing full well before hand that Satan would come along and decieve us, but yet he stood by and allowed that to happen.
This gets into the issue of how God sees time. Suffice it to say, I believe that God sees all the options available; He sees the branched timeline, if you will.

Anyway, God created us with the ability to choose whether to love Him or reject Him; we must choose to love Him freely, without compulsion. If He wanted us to be robots, then we would have been created so.

No one should ever expect another to love them. That's just wrong. Love comes naturally and involuntarily. You don't love someone just because they want you to.
Which is precisely why God gives us the choice. It's an invitation to have a relationship with the Creator of the world, Who sustains all things.

The bible expects us to believe in him and acknowledge Christ's death on the cross and to FEAR him, but must we love him?
Matthew 22 Jesus said to him, “‘You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your soul, and with all your mind.’[d] 38 This is the first and great commandment. 39 And the second is like it: ‘You shall love your neighbor as yourself.’[e] 40 On these two commandments hang all the Law and the Prophets.”

I just don't see why so many Christians try so hard to sugar coat God. God is who God is and we do our fellowman no favours by not being honest about our God.
And likewise, I just don't see why so many Christians try to make God look like a sadistic tyrant with a shotgun to their heads.
 

AmbiguousGuy

Well-Known Member
Your thread already takes the stance that God is real and that he is a cruel taskmaster who demands worship. I am telling you why I worship him and why you should if you truly believe in him. I am not working on a presumption but a firmly held belief that God is real.

You sound to me like that little kid in the school playground who brags that they can beat the bully, but when face to face with the bully they back down and cower. If you’re were face to face with God and he was about to put you through eternal suffering and you could see what was about to happen to you, you would be down on your knees quick fast. You’d be asking God which butt cheek he wants you to kiss first.

What a horrifying thought... that such a Creature might actually exist. Thank goodnes He doesn't.

And thank goodness that fewer and fewer children are being indoctrinated in such a view of God.
 

George-ananda

Advaita Vedanta, Theosophy, Spiritualism
Premium Member
I don't have an "interpretation" of him. I read the bible and take it at face value, and I see the kind of creature he is.

A lot of the things I am talking about (punishing all of humanity for the sins of Adam and Eve.. Burning billions in hell.. Scapegoating (letting Jesus take the blame for our sins), human sacrifice, forcing his creation to worship him) are all central parts of the doctrine. If they don't believe what is written about the biblical god, why would they worship him? Your answer doesn't account for all the things I mentioned.


That's my point, you 'take it at face value' but others don't. They have the common sense to know God is above some of the odd thinking ascribed to Him by men in the old testament.
 

Breathe

Hostis humani generis
I don't have an "interpretation" of him. I read the bible and take it at face value, and I see the kind of creature he is.
A literal interpretation is the worst kind of interpretation to have because the beauty behinds the words is lost on that person.

A lot of the things I am talking about (punishing all of humanity for the sins of Adam and Eve.. Burning billions in hell.. Scapegoating (letting Jesus take the blame for our sins), human sacrifice, forcing his creation to worship him) are all central parts of the doctrine.
Doctrine where, by tradition or within the text?
 

Introvert

Member
Your thread already takes the stance that God is real and that he is a cruel taskmaster who demands worship. I am telling you why I worship him and why you should if you truly believe in him. I am not working on a presumption but a firmly held belief that God is real.

You sound to me like that little kid in the school playground who brags that they can beat the bully, but when face to face with the bully they back down and cower. If you’re were face to face with God and he was about to put you through eternal suffering and you could see what was about to happen to you, you would be down on your knees quick fast. You’d be asking God which butt cheek he wants you to kiss first.

This is still a stance that is devoid of integrity, and no, I would not back down and cower. I do not live in fear of ancient horror stories or invisible bullies, and I don't give in to something I disagree with out of fear, because I have this thing called a spine.
 

Introvert

Member
That's my point, you 'take it at face value' but others don't. They have the common sense to know God is above some of the odd thinking ascribed to Him by men in the old testament.

Then why believe in the biblical god at all if they don't believe the bible to be entirely accurate?
 

Introvert

Member
Jesus' death and Resurrection do not save us from God; we don't need to be saved from God. We need to be saved from sin and death. And that is what Jesus saves us from.


God is the one who is giving us the ultimatum of believing in and worshiping him, or death.
 

Introvert

Member
The same way that a fireman says "Get out of the burning, collapsing building or you're going to die."

Except the fireman didn't create the building, or the fire, or you.

Literal=/=accurate.

"They have the common sense to know God is above some of the odd thinking ascribed to Him by men in the old testament."

This is what I was replying to. If they believe that some of the things said about god are "odd thinking ascribed to him by men" then they don't believe these things are accurate, do they?

This whole "you can't take it all literally" is just a cop-out, they use it like a blanket argument as if it makes up for EVERY single bad or immoral thing in the bible. You can't use it to justify every word.
 

CG Didymus

Veteran Member
Except the fireman didn't create the building, or the fire, or you.



"They have the common sense to know God is above some of the odd thinking ascribed to Him by men in the old testament."

This is what I was replying to. If they believe that some of the things said about god are "odd thinking ascribed to him by men" then they don't believe these things are accurate, do they?

This whole "you can't take it all literally" is just a cop-out, they use it like a blanket argument as if it makes up for EVERY single bad or immoral thing in the bible. You can't use it to justify every word.
Did the fireman light the fire? it is also similar to the Terminator. In the first movie he is trying to kill you. In the second he says, "Follow me if you want to live"? What a fickle android. Is God fickle also?
The degree of taking the Bible literal leads to all sorts of problems. Where you draw the line makes a huge difference. Like whether Jesus is God or not. And, whether God is evil. Or, is it allegorical and God really isn't that bad?
 

Shiranui117

Pronounced Shee-ra-noo-ee
Premium Member
Did the fireman light the fire? it is also similar to the Terminator. In the first movie he is trying to kill you. In the second he says, "Follow me if you want to live"? What a fickle android. Is God fickle also?
The analogy kinda breaks down when you realize that it's 2 different cyborgs in each film, even if they're cosmetically identical. So they're not "fickle..."

EDIT: I'll have you know that, because of your analogy, I went and watched Terminator 2 again on Netflix :D
 
Last edited:

George-ananda

Advaita Vedanta, Theosophy, Spiritualism
Premium Member
Then why believe in the biblical god at all if they don't believe the bible to be entirely accurate?

They're believing in God but not literally in the bible. Because believing in God is a very reasonable thing to do for many people born into a primarily Abrahamic society. And they believe the bible was written by humans and can contain errors. And the parts that make God unreasonable are obviously not to be accepted.
 
Top