I got to be honest, but me thinks some people don't want Christianity to be shared or described in any way to people in Muslims countries, period.
One of the largest problems with this perspective is that the individuals "sharing" Christianity with the local Muslim population, however well meaning in intent are currently perceived as conqerors, and most likely would be travelling around to "share" their religion in a large and well armed group.
Getting back to the hypothetical invasion of Texas argument, those individuals distributing
pick a religious text are doing so after conquest of Texas, and they are doing so in well armed groups of 10 or so, at security checkpoints, while some of their comrades (we will be generous and say the one's actually handing you the book are not) are pointing weapons at you. See the potenital issues?
No matter how "good" the "news" one is trying to share religiously, doing so by the sword is not the way to generate converts. It is particularly heinous for an organization that should be secular, and whose leaders have emphasized the secular nature of the mission. My personal feeling is that the individual soldiers that received these shipments and/or brought these books into the country in question should be publically tried. The US military is NOT a Christian organization, no matter what evangelicals think and proselytization should and cannot be tolerated.
I believe there is a right and wrong way in dealing with, albeit, a sensitive topic as religion within the Pashtun people. There is good and bad in all of us and the more we can "share" about our lives with each other, the little less afraid we will become.
I agree, there is a right and wrong way to deal with sharing knowledge about religions between peoples, unfortunately doing so while
occupying their country after ousting their legitimate (albeit incredibly reprehensible and even evil) government is, not really the correct time or place to do so.