• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Jewish group wants Mormons to stop proxy baptisms

Caladan

Agnostic Pantheist
NEW YORK – Holocaust survivors said Monday they are through trying to negotiate with the Mormon church over posthumous baptisms of Jews killed in Nazi concentration camps, saying the church has repeatedly violated a 13-year-old agreement barring the practice.
Leaders of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints say they are making changes to their massive genealogical database that will make it more difficult for names of Holocaust victims to be entered for posthumous baptism by proxy, a rite that has been a common Mormon practice for more than a century.
But Ernest Michel, honorary chairman of the American Gathering of Holocaust Survivors, said that is not enough. At a news conference in New York City on Monday, he said the church also must "implement a mechanism to undo what you have done."
"Baptism of a Jewish Holocaust victim and then merely removing that name from the database is just not acceptable," said Michel, whose parents died at Auschwitz. He spoke on the 70th anniversary of Kristallnacht, the Nazi-incited riots against Jews.
"We ask you to respect us and our Judaism just as we respect your religion," Michel said in a statement released ahead of the news conference. "We ask you to leave our six million Jews, all victims of the Holocaust, alone, they suffered enough."
Michel said talks with Mormon leaders, held as recently as last week, have ended. He said his group will not sue, and that "the only thing left, therefore, is to turn to the court of public opinion."
In 1995, Mormons and Jews inked an agreement to limit the circumstances that allow for the proxy baptisms of Holocaust victims. Ending the practice outright was not part of the agreement and would essentially be asking Mormons to alter their beliefs, church Elder Lance B. Wickman said Monday in an interview with reporters in Salt Lake City.
"We don't think any faith group has the right to ask another to change its doctrines," Wickman said. "If our work for the dead is properly understood ... it should not be a source of friction to anyone. It's merely a freewill offering."
Michel's decision to unilaterally end discussion of the issue through a news conference leaves the church uncertain about how to proceed, Wickman said.
Baptism by proxy allows faithful Mormons to have their ancestors baptized into the 178-year-old church, which they believe reunites families in the afterlife.
Using genealogy records, the church also baptizes people who have died from all over the world and from different religions. Mormons stand in as proxies for the person being baptized and immerse themselves in a baptismal pool.
Only the Jews have an agreement with the church limiting who can be baptized, though the agreement covers only Holocaust victims, not all Jewish people. Jews are particularly offended by baptisms of Holocaust victims because they were murdered specifically because of their religion.
Michel suggested that posthumous baptisms of Holocaust victims play into the hands of Holocaust deniers.
"They tell me, that my parents' Jewishness has not been altered but ... 100 years from now, how will they be able to guarantee that my mother and father of blessed memory who lived as Jews and were slaughtered by Hitler for no other reason than they were Jews, will someday not be identified as Mormon victims of the Holocaust?" Michel said Monday.
Wickman said the practice in no way impinges upon a person's "Jewishness, or their ethnicity, or their background."
Under the agreement with the Holocaust group, Mormons could enter the names of only those Holocaust victims to whom they were directly related. The church also agreed to remove the names of Holocaust victims already entered into its massive genealogical database.
Church spokesman Otterson said the church kept its part of the agreement by removing more than 260,000 names from the genealogical index.
But since 2005, ongoing monitoring of the database by an independent Salt Lake City-based researcher shows both resubmissions and new entries of names of Dutch, Greek, Polish and Italian Jews.
The researcher, Helen Radkey, who has done contract work for the Holocaust group, said her research suggests that lists of Holocaust victims obtained from camp and government records are being dumped into the database. She said she has seen and recorded a sampling of several thousand entries that indicate baptisms had been conducted for Holocaust victims as recently as July.
Wickman said lists of names have been entered into the database by a small number of well-meaning members who were acting "outside of policy." He said that church monitors have identified and removed 42,000 names from the database on their own, and that the church welcomes research from others.
Church officials say a new version of the database — called New Family Search — is being tested overseas and should reduce the problems. In the works for six years, the new database will discourage the submission of large lists of unrelated individuals. It will also separate names intended for temple rites from those submitted purely for genealogical purposes, the church states in a letter sent to Michel on Nov. 6.
"The names of any Holocaust victims we can identify in the database are to be flagged with a special designation — not available for temple ordinances," the letter states.
The church also proposes jump-starting a monitoring committee formed in 2005 to review database entries. The committee has met just once since 2005.
In May, the Vatican ordered Catholic dioceses worldwide to withhold member registries from Mormons so that Catholics could not be baptized.







Source: Jewish group wants Mormons to stop proxy baptisms - Yahoo! News
 
Last edited:

madhatter85

Transhumanist
Only descendants have the authority to authorize proxy baptisms. so if there is a descendant of one of them who joins the church, they can authorize it.
 

Watchmen

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
The second sentence says the Church is working on making changes to make it more difficult to do proxy baptisms for holocaust survivors. It sounds like the Church is acting in good faith to honor the agreement.
 

Apex

Somewhere Around Nothing
But Ernest Michel, honorary chairman of the American Gathering of Holocaust Survivors, said that is not enough. At a news conference in New York City on Monday, he said the church also must "implement a mechanism to undo what you have done."
What exactly has been done? It seems like they are trying to make a big argument out of a little thing.
 

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
What exactly has been done? It seems like they are trying to make a big argument out of a little thing.
They've introduce the possibility that they may now be Mormons, which (depending on how you look at it) may call into question whether they are still Jews. To some people, that's a big deal.
 

Apex

Somewhere Around Nothing
They've introduce the possibility that they may now be Mormons, which (depending on how you look at it) may call into question whether they are still Jews. To some people, that's a big deal.

From the article. (emphasis added)
"If our work for the dead is properly understood ... it should not be a source of friction to anyone. It's merely a freewill offering."

And, as has already been pointed out, members may only enter in names of their ancestry. Do they really think it is wrong for the descendants of holocaust victims to enter in names?

As I said, they are trying to make a big argument out of a small matter.
 

Halcyon

Lord of the Badgers
They've introduce the possibility that they may now be Mormons, which (depending on how you look at it) may call into question whether they are still Jews. To some people, that's a big deal.
I don't think anyone believes these people become Mormons just because they've been proxy-baptised, I think what the Jewish people are worried about is in the future the records might confuse people into thinking that some Holocaust victims were Mormon because of these baptisms.
 

Halcyon

Lord of the Badgers
And, as has already been pointed out, members may only enter in names of their ancestry. Do they really think it is wrong for the descendants of holocaust victims to enter in names?

As I said, they are trying to make a big argument out of a small matter.
The article also said that whole lists of unrelated people that are found in camp archives are being arbitrarily dumped into the database too. But to be fair, the Family Search people are doing all they can to stop that type of thing.
 

Apex

Somewhere Around Nothing
The article also said that whole lists of unrelated people that are found in camp archives are being arbitrarily dumped into the database too. But to be fair, the Family Search people are doing all they can to stop that type of thing.
Exactly. It is not as if we are purposely trying to simply take these lists and use them with no authorization. Some members get overzealous and enter in names they have no relation to. And, as you said, we try to stop this kind of thing. It is not just isolated to holocaust victims.
 

madhatter85

Transhumanist
I don't think anyone believes these people become Mormons just because they've been proxy-baptised, I think what the Jewish people are worried about is in the future the records might confuse people into thinking that some Holocaust victims were Mormon because of these baptisms.

people who are baptized by proxy are not recorded as members of the church as far as statistics are concerned, the only records are kept in Salt-Lake and are private.
 

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
And, as has already been pointed out, members may only enter in names of their ancestry. Do they really think it is wrong for the descendants of holocaust victims to enter in names?
No more wrong than having a Mormon funeral for a deceased Jewish person, IMO.

I don't think anyone believes these people become Mormons just because they've been proxy-baptised, I think what the Jewish people are worried about is in the future the records might confuse people into thinking that some Holocaust victims were Mormon because of these baptisms.
Yeah, that's what I was getting at. Sorry if I wasn't clear.
 

Halcyon

Lord of the Badgers
people who are baptized by proxy are not recorded as members of the church as far as statistics are concerned, the only records are kept in Salt-Lake and are private.
Ok, but surely you can understand their point of view too?

Just imagine if the Church of England started baptising Mormons killed in WWII, and the records were kept private in St. Paul's cathedral. Do you think the relatives of those dead might feel somewhat resentful about that?
 

Apex

Somewhere Around Nothing
Ok, but surely you can understand their point of view too?

Just imagine if the Church of England started baptising Mormons killed in WWII, and the records were kept private in St. Paul's cathedral. Do you think the relatives of those dead might feel somewhat resentful about that?
The only real way this analogy would work is if the relatives themselves were providing the information for these people to be baptized. Then there would be no point to it as the relatives could not get resentful for their own actions.
 

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
The only real way this analogy would work is if the relatives themselves were providing the information for these people to be baptized. Then there would be no point to it as the relatives could not get resentful for their own actions.
A person's relatives don't always agree, and they don't always know the mind of the deceased. Case in point: my Mom knew my Dad's wishes for his funeral but my aunt didn't agree with them. If it had been up to my aunt, things would not have gone the way my Dad would have wanted.

Add a few generations to that and the situation doesn't improve. I don't have the foggiest idea what some great-great uncle of mine might've thought about any topic, including religion. Why should what I think have any bearing on him?

It'd be different if you had uncovered some actual evidence that a deceased person had been a Mormon in life... but I believe that the only afterlife that we get is our legacy. It's not something to be messed with. If a person spent their life crafting a memory for future generations that he was a Jew, atheist, Hindu, or anything really, that memory should be respected.
 

Caladan

Agnostic Pantheist
The LDS Agreement

April 28, 1995
News Release -- Salt Lake City, Utah and New York, New York
Joint News Release by The Church of The Latter-day Saints and The American Gathering of Holocaust Survivors The Church of Jesus Christ of the Latter-day Saints and the American Gathering of Jewish Holocaust Survivors have reached an agreement over the issue of the posthumous baptisms of Jewish Holocaust victims by the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. The final agreement will be signed at the New York Office of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations on Wednesday, May 3, 1995, at which time a press conference will be held by the leaders of both groups.
"The issue came to the attention of the Gathering of Jewish Holocaust Survivors as a result of an article in a Jewish newspaper which stated, correctly that a Jewish Holocaust victim who was killed in Gurs (France) concentration camp was posthumously baptized by the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints," said Ernest Michel, Chairman of the World Gathering of Jewish Holocaust Survivors and an authorized representative of the American Gathering.
As a result of this article, Mr. Michel in behalf of the American Gathering of Jewish Holocaust Survivors, initiated discussions with the Church which extended over a period of several months.
"From the very beginning these discussions were conducted in a positive and friendly manner," Michel said. "They concluded in today's agreement between the Church and the American Gathering of Jewish Holocaust Survivors," he added.
In a statement issue today, the Church agreed, among other actions to be taken, to remove from the next issue of its International Genealogical Index the names of all known Jewish Holocaust victims who are not ancestors of living members of the Church. The American Gathering agreed to communicate with and inform major Jewish organizations as to its agreement with the Church. Four other major Jewish organizations have also approved this agreement.
"For more than a century the First Presidency of the Church has taught that members of the Church have a solemn responsibility to identify their deceased forebears and to provide temple ordinances for them regardless of ethnic background or origin," said Elder Monte J. Brough of the Church's Presidency of the Seventy and executive director of its Family History Department.
"However, in violation of Church policy, lists of Jewish Holocaust victims and other non-related groups and individuals have been submitted for temple ordinances. The First Presidency directed in March 1991 that temple ordinances for Jewish Holocaust victims be discontinued," Elder Brough said.
"Unfortunately, subsequent submissions of lists of Jewish Holocaust victims were made by certain individuals and posthumous baptisms in contravention of Church policy occurred," he added.

As a consequence of these discussions and the First Presidency's directive, the Church has agreed to:

  • Remove from the next issue of the International Genealogical Index the names of all known posthumous baptized Jewish Holocaust victims who are not direct ancestors of living members of the Church.
  • Provide a list of all Jewish Holocaust victims whose names are to be removed from the International Genealogical Index to the American Gathering of Jewish Holocaust Survivors, the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Commission, the N.Y. Holocaust Memorial Commission, the Wiesenthal Center in Los Angeles and Yad Vashem Holocaust Memorial in Jerusalem, Israel, and confirm in writing when removal of such names has been completed.
  • Reaffirm the policy and issue a directive to all officials and members of the Church to discontinue any future baptisms of deceased Jews, including all lists of Jewish Holocaust victims who are known Jews, except if they were direct ancestors of living members of the Church or the Church had the written approval of all living members of the deceased's immediate family.
  • Confirm this policy in all relevant literature produced by the Church.
  • Remove from the International Genealogical Index in the future the names of all deceased Jews who are so identified if they are known to be improperly included counter to Church policy.
  • Release to the American Gathering The First Presidency's 1995 directive.
The First Presidency reaffirmed that the Church, in accordance with past policy, will continue to make its family history records available to the public regardless of religious or ethnic affiliation.


From the article:

"Baptism by proxy allows faithful Mormons to have their ancestors baptized into the 178-year-old church, which they believe reunites families in the afterlife.
Using genealogy records, the church also baptizes people who have died from all over the world and from different religions. Mormons stand in as proxies for the person being baptized and immerse themselves in a baptismal pool.
Only the Jews have an agreement with the church limiting who can be baptized, though the agreement covers only Holocaust victims, not all Jewish people. Jews are particularly offended by baptisms of Holocaust victims because they were murdered specifically because of their religion.
Michel suggested that posthumous baptisms of Holocaust victims play into the hands of Holocaust deniers.
"They tell me, that my parents' Jewishness has not been altered but ... 100 years from now, how will they be able to guarantee that my mother and father of blessed memory who lived as Jews and were slaughtered by Hitler for no other reason than they were Jews, will someday not be identified as Mormon victims of the Holocaust?" Michel said Monday."

Posthumously proxy baptism
 
Last edited:

Caladan

Agnostic Pantheist
Personally, I wouldn't care less if Mormons baptized my rotting carcass.

Maybe to you there is no interest, but for many people there is.
I would not want my family who was murdered for their Jewishness to be mistakenly recorded as non Jews.
 

Apex

Somewhere Around Nothing
I would not want my family who was murdered for their Jewishness to be mistakenly recorded as non Jews.
:sarcastic Please show me where we believe that whoever is baptized by proxy becomes a Mormon?

I think this whole issue comes down to people not being able to understand just what our proxy baptisms represent.

Proxy baptism != Mormon
 

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
I think this whole issue comes down to people not being able to understand just what our proxy baptisms represent.

Proxy baptism != Mormon
What do they represent, then?

I was under the impression that they represented an opportunity for the deceased to become Mormon.
 
Top