Popeyesays
Well-Known Member
Your first argument must have been hard to make with a straight face. How about we finish that one?
You claimed Joseph Smith recieved no new revelation.
I have demonstrated your assertion to be false.
Would you like to concede that you are wrong or should I continue to list revelations recieved by Joseph Smith and you can explain why you think they are not revelation?
I have to disagree with you. In what way do you think it is not incorrect to call people by the wrong name? They are two completely different individuals.... with different names.... :slap:
ok...
No offense but it is retarded to use text that I do not accept as scripture in order to convi[n]ce me. Obviously the writings of Baha`u'llah hold no position of authority for me.
Quotations from scripture -- any scripture -- never prove a thing.
But they can demonstrate the reason for a belief, or an illustration of a point of view.
Regards,
Scott