• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

My understanding is probably far from the actual truth

Howard Is

Lucky Mud
I see being enlightened to be able to stay in the mindless state any time. When not able then not enlightened.
(Of course I am not talking about staying in the mindless state when driving a car, that would be unwise:D)

Who told you that was enlightenment ?
 

stvdv

Veteran Member: I Share (not Debate) my POV
I hope we continue this conversation, we’re getting to the point now. But it’s past bedtime here in Australia, so ... catch you later
:)
Oh, the other side of the world (from Holland; was there once)
Wish you Divine Dreams
 

Pipiripi

End Times Prophecy.
Aslong someone are open to know the truth, and pray with all their heart to see what is true. Jesus come to you by His Holy Spirit and open your mind. When you get the truth you will see that there is no time left for hanging around. You must preach the truth because it is the Holy Spirit in you that speak. Not an other being Holy Spirit, but Jesus Himself is working through you. Follow only the Bible.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Are you referring to those on trial, fellow jurors or both?
Jurors.
Some wanted to convict the guy because he looked "scary".
They had no interest in the evidence or argument.
I bullied them into acquittal because the prosecution had no case.
 

PoetPhilosopher

Veteran Member
Jurors.
Some wanted to convict the guy because he looked "scary".
They had no interest in the evidence or argument.
I bullied them into acquittal because the prosecution had no case.

Sounds kind of like a bigger problem in the court process...

For example, say you do have a judge determine something like say, a lawsuit. The judge could think the defendent is innocent, but still rule against them because they didn't bring up the proper defenses or cite the correct court cases to win against the plaintiff.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Sounds kind of like a bigger problem in the court process...

For example, say you do have a judge determine something like say, a lawsuit. The judge could think the defendent is innocent, but still rule against them because they didn't bring up the proper defenses or cite the correct court cases to win against the plaintiff.
I haven't seen that, but judges are often the problem.
It's especially bad in Michigan...."black robe syndrome".
 

PoetPhilosopher

Veteran Member
I haven't seen that, but judges are often the problem.
It's especially bad in Michigan...."black robe syndrome".

I see it all the time in debt collection. Say you are being sued by a collection agency for a $1000 debt. I really think you can win it even if you owe, in some cases. The problem? Winning could cost $10,000 in legal fees. So, you are basically guilty.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I see it all the time in debt collection. Say you are being sued by a collection agency for a $1000 debt. I really think you can win it even if you owe, in some cases. The problem? Winning could cost $10,000 in legal fees. So, you are basically guilty.
For such a small debt, one could act pro se.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Collection agencies usually employ lawyers. So you'd be arguing against a lawyer with a diploma.
Lawyers don't have any magical powers.
For a simple case over a small debt, they
can be easily defeated if one's case is strong.
Been there & done that.

But when there's complexity & real money at
stake, then tis best to employ one skilled in
legal gamesmanship.
 

PoetPhilosopher

Veteran Member
Lawyers don't have any magical powers.
For a simple case over a small debt, they
can be easily defeated if one's case is strong.
Been there & done that.

But when there's complexity & real money at
stake, then tis best to employ one skilled in
legal gamesmanship.

Just hope you win. Because if the case gets drawn out, and you lose... you'll typically have to pay the other side's legal fees.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Just hope you win. Because if the case gets drawn out, and you lose... you'll typically have to pay the other side's legal fees.
Not here.
It's rather rare to be awarded attorney fees, even when
winning overwhelmingly. I've seen hundreds of cases,
& only twice did I ever see the prevailing party get that.
And in one case, I know it was uncollectible.
So lawyers often file cases as a means of extorting
money from defendants.
 
Top