paarsurrey
Veteran Member
Which part of the Veda elaborates the above concept most? Please
Thread open for everybody of religion or no-religion, please.
Regards
Thread open for everybody of religion or no-religion, please.
Regards
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Many. But I have seen many start their ritual with 'Hiranyagarbha Sukta' (literally 'the Golden Womb'):Which part of the Veda elaborates the above concept most?
Thread open for everybody of religion or no-religion.
Please quote one and give reference for others. Right?Many. But I have seen many start their ritual with 'Hiranyagarbha Sukta' (literally 'the Golden Womb'):
"Hiraṇyagharbhaḥ samavartatāgre bhūtasya jātaḥ patirekāsīt l
sa dādhāra pṛithivīṃ dyāmutemāṃ kasmai devāya haviṣā vidhema ll"
http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/rigveda/rv10121.htm
In the beginning rose Hiranyagarbha, born Only Lord of all created beings.
He fixed and holdeth up this earth and heaven. What God shall we adore with our oblation?
I don't get one exactly. Veda in original is supposed to be in Sanskrit, so why should it be translated in Sanskrit again? I think one means ancient interpretations of Vedas in Sanskrit that might have been mixed with the original, later. Is that what one means? PleaseGive the original ancient Sanskrit translations please...
And not the mistranslations of English.
I don't get one exactly. Veda in original is supposed to be in Sanskrit, so why should it be translated in Sanskrit again? I think one means ancient interpretations of Vedas in Sanskrit that might have been mixed with the original, later. Is that what one means? Please
Regards
Give the original ancient Sanskrit translations please...
And not the mistranslations of English.
I don't get one exactly. Veda in original is supposed to be in Sanskrit, so why should it be translated in Sanskrit again? I think one means ancient interpretations of Vedas in Sanskrit that might have been mixed with the original, later. Is that what one means? Please
Regards
Sorry, If I wrongly understood your post.You might need an English teacher.
Thank your for the information. After Yajurveda I will read Rigveda, InshaAllah/Brahman-willing.Many. But I have seen many start their ritual with 'Hiranyagarbha Sukta' (literally 'the Golden Womb'):
"Hiraṇyagharbhaḥ samavartatāgre bhūtasya jātaḥ patirekāsīt l
sa dādhāra pṛithivīṃ dyāmutemāṃ kasmai devāya haviṣā vidhema ll"
http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/rigveda/rv10121.htm
In the beginning rose Hiranyagarbha, born Only Lord of all created beings.
He fixed and holdeth up this earth and heaven. What God shall we adore with our oblation?
Can't you access the Sanskrit original text of Veda yourself? Please quote it and give the translation yourself. It is your own Dharma. Right? PleaseGive the original ancient Sanskrit translations please...
And not the mistranslations of English.
The original Veda in Sanskrit is also a collection of words. Is not one sure about its being correct or incorrect, right or wrong? Yajurveda does provide to distinctively know right from wrong. Right? PleasI view any translation as neither correct nor incorrect. It is just a translation. Is a house correct or incorrect? No, it is just a collection of reassembled compounds of the earth. Correct/incorrect is in the realm of good/bad or right/wrong duality.
Brahman does not will anything. It has no desire for anything. It is uninvolved. Brahman is not a God who wants people to worship him or be his servants. I would prefer if you read Upanishads first.Thank your for the information. After Yajurveda I will read Rigveda, InshaAllah/Brahman-willing.
I know. In your case one God, One book, one messenger dominates your life. It is not like that in Hinduism. We have thousands of Gods and Goddesses, thousands of books and thousands of views. A Hindu will accept what seems to be right to him. In my view, one God, one book, one messenger is a fossil. And you are seeing the effect of that in the Muslim world. No country is at peace, right from Nigeria to Indonesia. Not one day goes without report of killings. We have awarded life imprisonment to six Muslim terrorists today, 30 killed in Aleppo, 100 arrested from Ankara hospital, US air-strikes in Sirte, Libya.The original Veda in Sanskrit is also a collection of words. Is not one sure about its being correct or incorrect, right or wrong? Yajurveda does provide to distinctively know right from wrong. Right?
Probably, hidden in the Vedas somewhere, but they're not primarily moral code books.The original Veda in Sanskrit is also a collection of words. Is not one sure about its being correct or incorrect, right or wrong? Yajurveda does provide to distinctively know right from wrong. Right? Pleas
Regards
Brahman does not will anything. It has no desire for anything. It is uninvolved. Brahman is not a God who wants people to worship him or be his servants. I would prefer if you read Upanishads first.