Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
It's how one conceptualizes the world in which they live. And it's not exclusive to religious people. Atheists, as well as theists have a worldview.
I looked into it, but I don't see how epistemology explains worldviews.Worldviews absolutely exist, are very personal, and are intrinsically linked to epistemology
Epistemology - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
If you want to better understand worldviews, and want to especially get to know your own and why you think in the way you do, I'd recommend looking into epistemology
Actually I forgot I asked this question before. If I recall correctly, your claim was that each worldview is different, pretty much no two alike, but some worldviews share the same name (Christian worldview, Atheist worldview, Communist worldview; etc. etc.) So the question becomes; why would some have the same name if they are different?Didn't we already do this thread?
Worldview
What is a worldview? And is this something that only applies to religious people?www.religiousforums.com
My answer remains the same as it did in that thread:
So yes. Everybody has one.
"Christian" is a religious identity. "Atheist" is a theistic identity. "Communist" is a political identity. These identities were formed based on one's experiences and character traits.Actually I forgot I asked this question before. If I recall correctly, your claim was that each worldview is different, pretty much no two alike, but some worldviews share the same name (Christian worldview, Atheist worldview, Communist worldview; etc. etc.) So the question becomes; why would some have the same name if they are different?
So there is no such a thing as a Christian, Atheist, or Communist worldview, that those are only identities? Because those identities represent only a small percentage of what forms one's experiences and character traits; agree?"Christian" is a religious identity. "Atheist" is a theistic identity. "Communist" is a political identity. These identities were formed based on one's experiences and character traits.
A worldview is the sum of one's identities forming how one conceptualizes the world in which they live based on these identities.
You should probably reread what I wrote, because I have no idea where you got that identities form experiences and character. That's quite the opposite of what I said.So there is no such a thing as a Christian, Atheist, or Communist worldview, that those are only identities? Because those identities represent only a small percentage of what forms one's experiences and character traits; agree?
The assumptions made about how we can know anything - and how we know what we know - has just about everything to do with one's perspective on the nature of reality (metaphysics - another major area of philosophy essential in a worldview). In philosophical terms, one can more or less break down a worldview as being comprised of:I looked into it, but I don't see how epistemology explains worldviews.
Okay; I misunderstood you; you’re saying these identities were formed based on ones experiences; and character traits; right? So if one’s (for example) christian identity is formed due to their experiences and character traits, they might also identify as a Democrat, a Socialist, an Evolutionist, and countless other identities as a result of experiences and character traits; would you agree?You should probably reread what I wrote, because I have no idea where you got that identities form experiences and character. That's quite the opposite of what I said.
Unless I'm missing something, this sounds like an explanation of how one forms their worldview, rather than what a worldview actually is.The assumptions made about how we can know anything - and how we know what we know - has just about everything to do with one's perspective on the nature of reality (metaphysics - another major area of philosophy essential in a worldview). In philosophical terms, one can more or less break down a worldview as being comprised of:
Keep in mind this is just explaining what a worldview is in strictly philosophical terms. While I'd consider of other ways of framing it to more or less be derivative of the above, others might not agree. For example, culture is a a huge component of one's worldview but I feel culture can more or less be broken down to how a collective of humans has decided questions of an epistemological, metaphysical, and ethical nature - though it does also include things like resolving aesthetic questions, rule of law, and other areas studied in philosophy.
- That person's epistemological perspective - what they assume about how they know what they know; how they go about determining what is true from what is false; how they go about defeating skepticism to create any sort of workable body of knowledge or information
- That person's metaphysical perspective - derived from epistemological assumptions, what they assume about the fundamental nature of reality; what are the first causes or principles underlying reality; what is the nature of being (ontology); how they go about understanding what is and is not, causation, time, change, necessity, etc.
- For humans, that person's ethical perspective - derived from both epistemological and metaphysical assumptions, what they assume about how they and the world ought to be or should be; what actions and behaviors are correct or incorrect; how they go about conducting themselves on a day-to-day basis and why.
That's a fair conclusion with the exception of "Evolutionist," because that's not really an identity. It's a pejorative made up by creationists to make them feel superior to those who are educated on and understand the theory of evolution.Okay; I misunderstood you; you’re saying these identities were formed based on ones experiences; and character traits; right? So if one’s (for example) christian identity is formed due to their experiences and character traits, they might also identify as a Democrat, a Socialist, an Evolutionist, and countless other identities as a result of experiences and character traits; would you agree?
Worldviews are enculturated. Their underlying facts or accuracy might be up for epistemic criticism, but I don't see how epistemology explains them.I looked into it, but I don't see how epistemology explains worldviews.
I'm a bit confused about how you came to this, because understanding what a worldview is from a philosophical perspective really doesn't get into the how worldviews happen at all. It's all about what a worldview is - one's epistemological, metaphysical, and ethical perspectives on things. Not how one reached those perspectives. That is something explored far more by cultural anthropology, sociology, and psychology.Unless I'm missing something, this sounds like an explanation of how one forms their worldview, rather than what a worldview actually is.
I looked into it, but I don't see how epistemology explains worldviews.
So if a person identifies as (for example) a Christian when it comes to religion, a Democrat when it comes to politics, a Socialist when it comes to economics, a Vegan when it comes to diet, and a Pacifist when it comes to Militarism, how does one get a single worldview when he identifies as so many different things when it comes to such a variety of different subjects?That's a fair conclusion with the exception of "Evolutionist," because that's not really an identity. It's a pejorative made up by creationists to make them feel superior to those who are educated on and understand the theory of evolution.
You mentioned assumptions an individual makes concerning how they know what they know, assumptions they make concerning the nature of reality, and how those assumptions form their ethical perspective. To me that sounds like a personal journey that might lead to a worldview rather than an explanation of what a worldview actually isI'm a bit confused about how you came to this, because understanding what a worldview is from a philosophical perspective really doesn't get into the how worldviews happen at all. It's all about what a worldview is - one's epistemological, metaphysical, and ethical perspectives on things. Not how one reached those perspectives. That is something explored far more by cultural anthropology, sociology, and psychology.
Much in the same way individual words, all which have their own definition, come together to get a single thought.So if a person identifies as (for example) a Christian when it comes to religion, a Democrat when it comes to politics, a Socialist when it comes to economics, a Vegan when it comes to diet, and a Pacifist when it comes to Militarism, how does one get a single worldview when he identifies as so many different things when it comes to such a variety of different subjects?
So if a person identifies as (for example) a Christian when it comes to religion, a Democrat when it comes to politics, a Socialist when it comes to economics, a Vegan when it comes to diet, and a Pacifist when it comes to Militarism, how does one get a single worldview when he identifies as so many different things when it comes to such a variety of different subjects?
So if a person identifies as (for example) a Christian when it comes to religion, a Democrat when it comes to politics, a Socialist when it comes to economics, a Vegan when it comes to diet, and a Pacifist when it comes to Militarism, how does one get a single worldview when he identifies as so many different things when it comes to such a variety of different subjects?