Audie
Veteran Member
Nothing you would wantReligion?
What did I win?
Try again.
Check nearby foe thinking that is tangledy, and squishy like
overcooked noodles.
Last edited:
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Nothing you would wantReligion?
What did I win?
Lashing out isOnly your own, judging from your posts.
Isn't ad hominem considered irrational anymore? Maybe I've simply lived too long...
It's like I'm back in the 70's, when people thought the vapid platitudes were cool. If you use unevidenced emotional superstition, then you have to demonstrate your conclusions are valid. Logic has already demonstrated its efficacy.
Damn, I can't catch a break...Nothing you would want
Try again.
Check nearby foe thinking that is tangledy, and squishy like
overcooked noodles.
No Sheldon, (1) I don’t have to tailor my language to fit your limited mindset. (2) My point was clear enough, and you just proved it’s accuracy.
(3) I thought you liked metaphors btw?
Some people just don't accept logic. They assume that logic is somehow connected to scientific belief and is the same thing.If you use unevidenced emotional superstition, then you have to demonstrate your conclusions are valid. Logic has already demonstrated its efficacy.
This coming from someone who thinks logic is equivalent to name dropping and "It makes sent to me"Some people just don't accept logic. They assume that logic is somehow connected to scientific belief and is the same thing.
Damn, I can't catch a break...
Some people just don't accept logic. They assume that logic is somehow connected to scientific belief and is the same thing.
Well I suspect logic is entirely unscathed, anyway...This coming from someone who thinks logic is equivalent to name dropping and "It makes sent to me"
I suspect that Sheldon is entirely unscathed.
Abs-duction of steel!Well I suspect logic is entirely unscathed, anyway...
I've noticed. And the thing is, if they actually did did discover evidence for a deity I was be sincerely excited to learn more. It would be amazing!Have you noticed how theists who are happy to deny scientific facts, and cast aspersions on science in general, are then too keen to insert words like science and scientists, in front of claims they evidence a deity. The odd thing is I always flick on a news channel when I hear such claims, and not once are they running a banner headline "scientific evidence for god".
Only if they divine it from the entrails of a communion wafer.If only I we could work out what it means? I mean you think the Catholic Herald would get it right?