Ingledsva
HEATHEN ALASKAN
The word Tetragrammaton, yes. But the actual four letters, no.
What? The letters are in the text holding the name place, not the word tetragrammaton.
*
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
The word Tetragrammaton, yes. But the actual four letters, no.
I think we're having a disconnect.What? The letters are in the text holding the name place, not the word tetragrammaton.
*
To understand what this verse means, you should study the precise Hebrew -- here is the explanation from about 1000 years ago:
It is not written here לֹא הוֹדַעְךְתִּי, “but My Name YHWH I did not make known to them,” but לֹא נוֹדַעְךְתִּי, “I did not become known.” [I.e.,] I was not recognized by them with My attribute of keeping faith, by dint of which My name is called YHWH, [which means that I am] faithful to verify My words, for I made promises to them, but I did not fulfill [them while they were alive].
But, as the commentary explains, it refers to a trait, not a name "was not recognized by them with My attribute of keeping faith, by dint of which My name is called YHWH, [which means that I am] faithful to verify My words."That just makes it - by my name YHVH I did not become known (to them)
It still says the name is YHVH.
But, as the commentary explains, it refers to a trait, not a name "was not recognized by them with My attribute of keeping faith, by dint of which My name is called YHWH, [which means that I am] faithful to verify My words."
What the text calls a "name" is a title reflecting an attribute.
No, the rabbis agree. The question is what you mean when you say "name." The 4 letters are a "name" of G-d, but not a personal name -- a label for a certain aspect. God is infinite -- no single combination of letters can describe him completely. o there are combinations of letters which call forth traits and facets. The commentator points out that the forefathers didn't have an aspect of faithfulness revealed to them so in that sense they didn't know that "name".The Rabbinic page I read did not agree with that.
It said YHVH was a form of the name of God, without being disrespectful by using the whole actual name.
And Harmonious said -"The four letters ARE God's ineffable name. ..."
I'm getting confused. Your Rabbis don't agree on this?
*
I'm curious now. What site did you find that says this?The Rabbinic page I read did not agree with that.
It said YHVH was a form of the name of God, without being disrespectful by using the whole actual name.
No, the rabbis agree. The question is what you mean when you say "name." The 4 letters are a "name" of G-d, but not a personal name -- a label for a certain aspect. God is infinite -- no single combination of letters can describe him completely. o there are combinations of letters which call forth traits and facets. The commentator points out that the forefathers didn't have an aspect of faithfulness revealed to them so in that sense they didn't know that "name".
This is how Jewish sites use the word "name". G-d has no singular and personal name to the exclusion of other names. There are combinations that have mystical significance and call forth elements of G-d's "personality" but none is a name over another. The combination of the 4 letters is a significant set of letters which refers to G-d's attribute of mercy.That is where I am confused because the page I visited implied that the four letters were part of the Name of God - with letters left out so as not to announce the actual name. They did not say it was a descriptive of aspects.
*
I'm curious now. What site did you find that says this?
You are a capitalist. you have four, I have none.??? I don't get that joke. :/
Yes, Is not his name given in Qur'an?I think because of stupidity.
G_d would imply you're trying to use the word as a name, which can't be spoken; yet in doing so, you're implying it is a name, which would then confuse the matter more, by making it the name of another deity.
How about this one: Apophatic Theology.I forgot months ago I looked up this link. Its easy to read but I never got confirmation if it is Jewish teaching. Take a look: Judaism 101: The Nature of G-d