• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Who Will Pay Trump's $454 million Bond and What Favors Will They Ask in Return?

sayak83

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
So, we need to pay attention to who pays Trump's bonds in the various court judgments against him. If they are paid through covert channels that go back to Putin, Xi, Kim, Saudi Arabia, or Orban we have a real problem. Trump would be in their debt and who knows what they may ask him to do. I suspect he has already given classified information to hostile foreign governments and this is one reason he fought so hard against returning documents to NARA.

If nobody posts, is Trump going to jail?
(Please please please....)
 

crossfire

LHP Mercuræn Feminist Heretic ☿
Premium Member
The RNC is paying legal fees He may try to get the MAGA's to contribute. He did say he was going to drain the swamp. ;)
 

PureX

Veteran Member
I predict that no one will bail Trump out because they can see that Trump will never be in a position to repay the favor. And even if he were, Trump doesn't pay his debts, anyway. He's become notorious for it. He does whatever serves himself and to hell with anyone else.
 

Wandering Monk

Well-Known Member
One would think that if Trump put up his properties as collateral, someone would post his bond. The fact that no one has suggests that maybe he doesn't have enough equity in those properties to cover the bond. If he doesn't have enough equity, the properties aren't worth enough to cover the bond OR he has them mortgaged.
 

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
One would think that if Trump put up his properties as collateral, someone would post his bond. The fact that no one has suggests that maybe he doesn't have enough equity in those properties to cover the bond. If he doesn't have enough equity, the properties aren't worth enough to cover the bond OR he has them mortgaged.
The fact that he's just been convicted of fraudulently overvaluing his properties in order to get loans might be a factor in why nobody's jumping to do this for Trump.
 

wellwisher

Well-Known Member
So, we need to pay attention to who pays Trump's bonds in the various court judgments against him. If they are paid through covert channels that go back to Putin, Xi, Kim, Saudi Arabia, or Orban we have a real problem. Trump would be in their debt and who knows what they may ask him to do. I suspect he has already given classified information to hostile foreign governments and this is one reason he fought so hard against returning documents to NARA.

I am more concerned how this will gotten gain will be distributed, by the DNC, and whether this new shake down racket will spread. This is unprecedented and could set a dangerous legal precedent in Democrat run states, that the DNC can use to steal at will. Every businessman looking for loans is a salesman. However, the Banks are experts and also know this sales and drive can be a good investment. If you can use it on Trump, you can use it on anyone, since sales without any tangible victims is the new criteria.

It also sets the dangerous precedent of being able to steal any property, by making fines excessive to beyond the value of your property, so you have to default, and they can steal your house. We are dealing with DEI operative puppets, who are not qualified, but privilege by political appointments. This a recipe for outside corruption. You can also see the misuse of funds in other Trump trials; Georgia. This may be why the second Amendment was added; keep the crooks honest, and why the Party of the Crooks, works so hard to take guns away from honest people, but not from the criminals.

Say corrupt Democrat, use their new illegal system to extort people, to where they need to make compromises, with bad people, like Putin, to pay off the extortion, who is at fault? Image if Putin is more of a humanitarian then members of the DNC?

There is another topic about good and evil in Philosophy. How all groups have good and evil people. This will be good working example of the evil people within the Democrat Party. What should all the good Democrats do? Are they too afraid of these corrupt and dangerous people, such that they feel helpless like good citizens among organized crime?

Again, this is why we have the second Amendment. All the crooks would prefer you be helpless and unable to defend yourself, when they come to get you. Good Democrats were already made vulnerable to street criminals by the higher level Democrat in Government. Good people need to team up to isolate evil, so the evil can be driven out. The crooks cannot see who you vote for, so vote for good people.
 
Last edited:

Altfish

Veteran Member
I am more concerned how this will gotten gain will be distributed, by the DNC, and whether this new shake down racket will spread. This is unprecedented and could set a dangerous legal precedent in Democrat run states, that the DNC can use to steal at will. Every businessman looking for loans is a salesman. However, the Banks are experts and also know this sales and drive can be a good investment. If you can use it on Trump, you can use it on anyone, since sales without any tangible victims is the new criteria.

It also sets the dangerous precedent of being able to steal any property, by making fines excessive to beyond the value of your property, so you have to default, and they can steal your house. We are dealing with DEI operative puppets, who are not qualified, but privilege by political appointments. This a recipe for outside corruption. You can also see the misuse of funds in other Trump trials; Georgia. This may be why the second Amendment was added; keep the crooks honest, and why the Party of the Crooks, works so hard to take guns away from honest people, but not from the criminals.

Say corrupt Democrat, use their new illegal system to extort people, to where they need to make compromises, with bad people, like Putin, to pay off the extortion, who is at fault? Image if Putin is more of a humanitarian then members of the DNC?

There is another topic about good and evil in Philosophy. How all groups have good and evil people. This will be good working example of the evil people within the Democrat Party. What should all the good Democrats do? Are they too afraid of these corrupt and dangerous people, such that they feel helpless like good citizens among organized crime?

Again, this is why we have the second Amendment. All the crooks would prefer you be helpless and unable to defend yourself, when they come to get you. Good Democrats were already made vulnerable to street criminals by the higher level Democrat in Government. Good people need to team up to isolate evil, so the evil can be driven out. The crooks cannot see who you vote for, so vote for good people.
Keep drinking the Kool Aid.
 

Pogo

Active Member
Keep drinking the Kool Aid.

I am more concerned how this will gotten gain will be distributed, by the DNC, and whether this new shake down racket will spread. This is unprecedented and could set a dangerous legal precedent in Democrat run states, that the DNC can use to steal at will. Every businessman looking for loans is a salesman. However, the Banks are experts and also know this sales and drive can be a good investment. If you can use it on Trump, you can use it on anyone, since sales without any tangible victims is the new criteria.

It also sets the dangerous precedent of being able to steal any property, by making fines excessive to beyond the value of your property, so you have to default, and they can steal your house. We are dealing with DEI operative puppets, who are not qualified, but privilege by political appointments. This a recipe for outside corruption. You can also see the misuse of funds in other Trump trials; Georgia. This may be why the second Amendment was added; keep the crooks honest, and why the Party of the Crooks, works so hard to take guns away from honest people, but not from the criminals.

Say corrupt Democrat, use their new illegal system to extort people, to where they need to make compromises, with bad people, like Putin, to pay off the extortion, who is at fault? Image if Putin is more of a humanitarian then members of the DNC?

There is another topic about good and evil in Philosophy. How all groups have good and evil people. This will be good working example of the evil people within the Democrat Party. What should all the good Democrats do? Are they too afraid of these corrupt and dangerous people, such that they feel helpless like good citizens among organized crime?

Again, this is why we have the second Amendment. All the crooks would prefer you be helpless and unable to defend yourself, when they come to get you. Good Democrats were already made vulnerable to street criminals by the higher level Democrat in Government. Good people need to team up to isolate evil, so the evil can be driven out. The crooks cannot see who you vote for, so vote for good people.

Are wishing wells pagan?
What is the spiritual meaning of a wishing well?

Wishing wells are cultural expressions of a belief in magic and the ability to control fate through the supernatural. This notion is predicated on the idea that the “outcome of events and objects are influenced by various thoughts (e.g. wishes) and interactions with the physical environment” (Vikan & Clausen, 1993, p.

Meanwhile back in reality, do you have any evidence for any of this?
 

Stevicus

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
I am more concerned how this will gotten gain will be distributed, by the DNC, and whether this new shake down racket will spread. This is unprecedented and could set a dangerous legal precedent in Democrat run states, that the DNC can use to steal at will. Every businessman looking for loans is a salesman. However, the Banks are experts and also know this sales and drive can be a good investment. If you can use it on Trump, you can use it on anyone, since sales without any tangible victims is the new criteria.

It also sets the dangerous precedent of being able to steal any property, by making fines excessive to beyond the value of your property, so you have to default, and they can steal your house. We are dealing with DEI operative puppets, who are not qualified, but privilege by political appointments. This a recipe for outside corruption. You can also see the misuse of funds in other Trump trials; Georgia. This may be why the second Amendment was added; keep the crooks honest, and why the Party of the Crooks, works so hard to take guns away from honest people, but not from the criminals.

Say corrupt Democrat, use their new illegal system to extort people, to where they need to make compromises, with bad people, like Putin, to pay off the extortion, who is at fault? Image if Putin is more of a humanitarian then members of the DNC?

There is another topic about good and evil in Philosophy. How all groups have good and evil people. This will be good working example of the evil people within the Democrat Party. What should all the good Democrats do? Are they too afraid of these corrupt and dangerous people, such that they feel helpless like good citizens among organized crime?

Again, this is why we have the second Amendment. All the crooks would prefer you be helpless and unable to defend yourself, when they come to get you. Good Democrats were already made vulnerable to street criminals by the higher level Democrat in Government. Good people need to team up to isolate evil, so the evil can be driven out. The crooks cannot see who you vote for, so vote for good people.

I think our government became "for sale" a long time ago, although the quality of people seeking to buy it appears to change depending on the quality of the product.

I don't know what's going to happen with the money. For the Democratic Party, they do have a sufficient war chest, so I can't see that it would have anything to do with grubbing for Trump's money. Though I'm sure there will probably be some who will try to dip their hand into the till, but that's just the nature of politics in general, sadly enough.

The Democrats simply want to defeat Trump; that seems to be their one and only goal. It doesn't really seem to be about the money anymore. It's just pure, entrenched battle - with tons of money pouring in to feed it.

I suppose the lawyers end up with a lot of it in the end. All those lawsuits. I think we can expect more after this election.

The irony is that, the more money they put into the system, the cheaper it actually becomes.
 
Top