This was a revelation......whales can change climate.
Not accidental methinks.
Not accidental methinks.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
This was a revelation......whales can change climate.
Not accidental methinks.
This was a revelation......whales can change climate.
Not accidental methinks.
If you liked that, then perhaps you should watch this.This was a revelation......whales can change climate.
Not accidental methinks.
If the cricket thing is true, has anyone be able to repeat such results?
More silly foolishness from Fundamentalist Creationist Agenda.
In nature nothing is accidental. Natural Law determines the outcome of all cause and effect relationships. The variation in the outcomes is described by fractal math, and is not causal as to their outcome.
If you liked that, then perhaps you should watch this.
How to fight desertification and reverse climate change
Repeatable or not the harmonies of music exist in nature and humans listened to those have composed the music over the millennia, including natural harmonies innate in human.
If the cricket thing is true, has anyone be able to repeat such results?
Cause and effect.....we differ as to the cause. Laws don't make themselves.
Yep, everything in nature is just an endless series of very fortunate accidents.....nothing is ever planned or demonstrates intelligent design. I think we understand your position. Perhaps a white stick might help.....?
Natural Laws do not cause themselves, but there is no objective evidence that they have not always existed.
We actually do not differ as to the ultimate cause, because I am a Theist and a scientist.
The problem is with your argument of assertions without evidence, and the misuse of language relating to science, to justify your fundamentalist agenda.
The fundamentalist arguments for a literal Biblical Creation are worse and abhorrently dishonest.
You not only need a science education, but also a basic elementary English education on the proper use of words.
True, there is no objective evidence that the nature of our physical existence was planned, nor demonstrates the necessity of intelligent design.
What is true is the vocal and sound harmonies are common throughout life, and the evidence is humans in the past listened to those harmonies, and composed our music, no problem.
You should use you new found science expertise to explain why this is a flight of fancy extrapolated from a tiny dollop of data.This was a revelation......whales can change climate.
Not accidental methinks.
And when you play it backward it says, "Darwin was right, Darwin was right!" Sheesh ...If the cricket thing is true, has anyone be able to repeat such results?
There is no evidence that the universe has always existed....or that matter has always existed. What use are laws if there is nothing to apply them to?
Well I believe that you are incorrect on both counts. I disagree with both your theism and your science.
"Misuse of language"?...now that is rich. Everything I have ever read that purports to argue for macro-evolution is implied or suggested, yet it is presented as established fact.....nice use of misleading language, propping up your own agenda.
Then you have no idea what the arguments are. I am not a YEC....I believe in an old earth with slow and progressive acts of creation. This agrees with science's "evidence", just interpreted differently. Intelligent Design is seen everywhere in nature. You'd have to be blind to deny it.
How's the altitude up there....? Do you guys have to earn degrees in arrogance, or what?
Hogwash. You choose not to see it because you have a scientific agenda to uphold. If he is not the Creator, then I have to wonder what use your god is to you?
Yep, music just invents itself. Like everything else in evolution's teachings. I don't buy any of it.
But if was a legitimate claim, then others should be able to reproduce the same results.I don't know, but it was a heavenly sound. The real time crickets played over the slowed down version....just amazing!
This was a revelation......whales can change climate.
That the world runs on recycled poo is hardly a revelation - after all, the vast majority of life on earth is entirely dependent on the plant and bacterial poo we call oxygen being recycled back into the atmosphere - most everything we consume has been the poo of another creature at some point. But I thought the whale poo thing and the cow poo thing were kind of interesting in the details. I don't really know too much about it, but I'm guessing the whale-krill-phytoplankton food chain might be one of the simplest such systems in existence and in that respect its an interesting one to study. More whales = more whale poo = more nutrients for phytoplankton = more krill = more whales...and so on. A side product, of course, is more phytoplankton = more photosynthesis = more sequestration of carbon...etc. And figuring out how to reverse desertification by producing more food in a manner that is more closely aligned with the evolutionary biology of the animals we use for food (i.e. have them as massive herds of wandering herbivores) seems like a really sensible approach. I reckon we still probably need to have a lot more trees (natural and/or artificial) though - and try our best not to offset the ecological gains we might make by these measures by profligate use of the resources at our disposal (i.e. we still need to balance our way of life with natural cycles that have sustained life on earth for 3.8 billion years rather than trying to conquer them).If you liked that, then perhaps you should watch this.
How to fight desertification and reverse climate change
But if was a legitimate claim, then others should be able to reproduce the same results.
Or at least go by a recognized objective standard by which claims are based.But if was a legitimate claim, then others should be able to reproduce the same results.