I think it would be more simple to create one thread which claims that the LDS make the best art, music, film, and literature.
I finally got to see it a couple of months ago, and I was generally disappointed. His depiction of King Herod was outrageous. King Herod is responsible for remarkable feats, including extensive renovations of the Temple in Jerusalem. His outstanding engineering and architectural feats are still scattered in the modern Israeli landscape. Instead Gibson chose to depict him as an incompetent individual with transvestite tendencies.
I found Gibson's Apocalypto to be a much more realistic and intense movie. Much sharper than the melodramatic The Passion of the Christ.
While a great part of my family are 'white Jews', I find your comment above to be anachronistic. Your allusion to 'brown Iraqis' is also curious, but most importantly perhaps is that the development of Ashkenazi Jewry (European Jewry) gained its full historical momentum after the times of Jesus. In those days Jews were still an essentially Near Eastern people. And while it still doesn't mean that they were overly dark people, the average Near Eastern Jew or Arab is olive skinned, and in any case doesn't really answer the Aryan ideal. So while there are fair Jews and Arabs, it's not really historical to portray Jesus with European features. It is solely a matter of cultural aesthetics rather than historical accuracy.