Pure-Truth
Member
This thread is in response to Abuse and Corruption within Religious Institutions..
The steady incline of Religious Institutes abusing their very own claimed morality is cause enough for concern, so what do we do about these institutions?
Close them down? Put them on notice? or do we Tolerate ands allow them to continue on, Now the argument with out a doubt will - time and time again come up that, its the fault of individuals within the institution that such immorality rears itself..
But my point is, how is it that such immorality is able to exist and even persist in some cases for thousands of years, within such institutions, when they are the ones that have defined the very moral lines that are being violated? One would think religious leaders that have been appointed on the bases of being morally pure should be immune to crossing such lines, if indeed the referred religion is the one and only right path in attaining a higher standard of morality, and when I refer to the right path, I refer to the inference to what all religions claim, in that they are the right path to a higher morality..
Which to me points out, if their leaders are prone to violating defined moral lines, then that religion is in fact not the right path, as had it been the right path, their leaders should be prime examples of defined morality..
Obviously we cant close these religious Institutes down as their are to many individuals that have much the same morality, as all the institutions subscribers base much of their reasoning much the same as their leaders have preceding them, what is implied by me here is that what ever information is provided in the attainment to a higher morality may in fact promote the crossing of moral lines, and if we look to the headlines we have the evidence, YES?..
what say you? Oh!? And be Nice to each other..
Cheers,
Pete..
The steady incline of Religious Institutes abusing their very own claimed morality is cause enough for concern, so what do we do about these institutions?
Close them down? Put them on notice? or do we Tolerate ands allow them to continue on, Now the argument with out a doubt will - time and time again come up that, its the fault of individuals within the institution that such immorality rears itself..
But my point is, how is it that such immorality is able to exist and even persist in some cases for thousands of years, within such institutions, when they are the ones that have defined the very moral lines that are being violated? One would think religious leaders that have been appointed on the bases of being morally pure should be immune to crossing such lines, if indeed the referred religion is the one and only right path in attaining a higher standard of morality, and when I refer to the right path, I refer to the inference to what all religions claim, in that they are the right path to a higher morality..
Which to me points out, if their leaders are prone to violating defined moral lines, then that religion is in fact not the right path, as had it been the right path, their leaders should be prime examples of defined morality..
Obviously we cant close these religious Institutes down as their are to many individuals that have much the same morality, as all the institutions subscribers base much of their reasoning much the same as their leaders have preceding them, what is implied by me here is that what ever information is provided in the attainment to a higher morality may in fact promote the crossing of moral lines, and if we look to the headlines we have the evidence, YES?..
what say you? Oh!? And be Nice to each other..
Cheers,
Pete..