Are you aware that you are violating the ethics you agreed to when you joined this forum to continually make remarks about a third person that is no in your conversation, such as here? I have been the topic of conversation between you and several atheist. It is called ganging up, twisting the facts, trolling and slander. Do you think your ethics are beyond question?
Put your honor where your mouth is and cite the times that I have twisted any fact or done a hurtful thing to an individual on this thread. All you have said about me has been hateful lies and spiteful distortions with your outhouse ethical system. I am standing firm on what I believe and if that offends you, that's tough. I was invited by this thread to say what I think is wrong with atheism and that is all I am doing.
That "Self Appointed Martyrdom" is a tough gig, isn't it?
For the record - no, I don't believe my ethics are beyond question. It would appear though, that based on your posts, you believe that yours are (because, as we all know, only yours are derived from God - the REAL God).
I have not lied about you or to you on this thread. I have (along with several others) tried to show you the errors of your logic, which you insist on misreading as "ganging up on". At the risk of appealing to the majority, when 30 different people tell you that your fly is open, you might just want to check it.
The fact that you stand firm on what you believe does not offend me in the slightest. In fact, I am glad that you have the courage of your convictions. On the other hand, I am deeply offended when you insist on prostelytizing, by telling everyone that strays into this thread that you, and only you, can possibly be right.
Something for you to consider:
In this debate, not one atheist has responded to even one of my posts in what you would consider "attack mode". In my very first post in this thread (page 11, post #305), I stated my view as to what was "wrong" with atheism. If you read that post, you will notice that I did not make any generalizations about atheists, nor did I impugn what they believe. I merely expressed why I don't embrace it, and I gave a very clear reason for my position.
Now, obviously, the atheists that are participating in this thread don't agree with my view on this, but they don't feel that I attacked them.
On the other hand, you have done nothing BUT attack them (and, in an act of sheer ignorance, agnostics such as myself as well). Make that a repeated act of ignorance. AFTER it was pointed out to you. Several times.
You have claimed that atheists (and agnostics) don't understand the rules of logic, that only you do, and that we just don't "get it". As if all non-theists are just to obtuse to follow your pristine use of the discipline. Your soul mate (Rolling Stone) has also gone as far as to tell us that not only do we not understand, we are too lazy or incapable of even conducting the search for truth.
If you want me to "back off" and give you some breathing space, you are going to have to earn it. Demonstrate some semblance of humility, cut the condescension, and actually learn how to listen to what others say without dismissing things that challenge your belief system as "atheist logic" (whatever the heck you think that is). Then, and ONLY then, will I give you the respect that you crave so dearly. Until then, I will continue to treat your posts with contempt, and I will continue to challenge the outrageously asinine statements that you make.
You embrace intolerance as if it were a badge of honor. Does that make sense to you - on any level?
Your bestest buddy,
TVOR
:run:
