Rick O'Shez
Irishman bouncing off walls
So we're going to see, hear and read a very great deal about Mr Farage over the next few years.
Care to have a small wager on that?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
So we're going to see, hear and read a very great deal about Mr Farage over the next few years.
An image is the by-product of what one stands for.
Oh, UKIP will take South Thanet by storm, I guarantee you that. The latest Survation poll puts him way ahead of anyone else. Now, I know that I have said that polls are mathematically pointless, but when polls are taken for a smaller turnout of voters, they begin to paint a very realistic picture of what is coming. UKIP will take many seats in Kent alone.
We're certainly going to hear a lot about him coming up to the General Election. Unfortunately, most of what we will hear will be slanderous and an appeal to emotion over actual political/economical (depending) arguments.
I'm still waiting for your best guess on UKIP seats for a little (RF legal) flutter!Care to have a small wager on that?
No it isn't, there are professionals who advise politicians in great detail on the image they project.
I don't think that Mr Farage or many UKIP candidates have sought the assistance of the 'front and face makers'.
Of course he has! They all do. Clearly he is trying to project a "man of the people image", smoking **** and drinking beer. I wouldn't be surprised if before becoming well known on the political stage he was a non-smoking teetotaller!
Just imagine the scene:
Publicist: "Sorry Nigel but you are going to have to take up smoking **** and drinking beer"
Nigel: "But those things are very bad for you!"
Publicist: "Well you probably die a lot younger, but at least you'll be famous"
No it isn't, there are professionals who advise politicians in great detail on the image they project.
Of course he has! They all do. Clearly he is trying to project a "man of the people image", smoking **** and drinking beer. I wouldn't be surprised if before becoming well known on the political stage he was a non-smoking teetotaller!
Just imagine the scene:
Publicist: "Sorry Nigel but you are going to have to take up smoking **** and drinking beer"
Nigel: "But those things are very bad for you!"
Publicist: "Well you probably die a lot younger, but at least you'll be famous"
I am as likely to support and vote for isis as I am to vote for ukip.
Looks like he just swallowed a dog end.
Some nice speculation there, Spiny Norman. Care to provide proof?
My God... we're in bloody England! A man of the people would buy a bottle of White-Lightning and sod off home so he could drink it all himself. You've been sheltered all these years.
Looks like he just swallowed a dog end.
You would rather support a group that systemically executes people publicly over a group that wants us out of a superstate which makes 75% of our laws?
Priorities..
You are learning ukip style very well.
you invent your own version of what people say and respond to that instead.
of course I find both ukip and isis abhorrent.
On balance I would much prefer to be in Europe than outside it. Inevitably that entails sharing in the necessary lawmaking and the costs and benefits of membership.
What this doesn't take into account is that there are financial gains for being an EU member.?
And we will stay in Europe for as long as the country is on the face of the Earth--even if UKIP comes to power.
What we don't want is to stay inside of the EU--a political assembly that is entirely separate from the question of being in the geographical Europe.
Except we aren't sharing the lawmaking, but laws are put upon us instead. There is nothing we can do about this, unless every other member state were to vote against each and every piece of legislation (1000s upon 1000s of pieces of legislation have been enforce upon us). And if this happened, then what is the point of the EU?
Except we aren't sharing the costs and benefits of membership. We make an average loss of around £33,000,000/day. Gross contributions are ~£55,000,000. This means that we only get £12,000,000/day back.
Now tell me, how is this sharing?
What this doesn't take into account is that there are financial gains for being an EU member.
e.g. Nissan, Toyota, and many more are in this country because we are an EU member and it gives them access to the free market. Will they stay if we leave?
Regarding the laws that are 'put upon us'; that is not true, the UK as an EU member is involved in creating these laws, reviewing and refining these laws. I have been involved in this process in a minor way as part of construction legislation.
There is a lot wrong with Europe that needs reforming but spitting the dummy out is not the answer and will cost the UK dearly.