Sorry, I'm getting very mixed signals..
So forget this "being not like the others" message, UKIP are fundamentally just like all the others but with a few different policies?
Few different policies? I beg to differ.
UKIP have a totally different attitude to how this country should be run when comparing their ambitions with the likes of the Conservatives and Labour, who are in favour of allowing abroad institutions conduct our legislation.
Ah, such sweet naiveté.. you really think that people think like that?
Using logic, mostly, yes. I would rather a boring, sloppy PM that passed populist policy than an excited, dramatic PM that did nothing.
Why then do politicians get forced out of office for personal peccadillos? If policy is all that matters, why has a single MP (or councillor) ever resigned?
If one breaks the law, no matter what position they hold, it is then that we should shame and prosecute them. I have no interest in having politicians holding office that have broken the law.
Those that have used dodgy action to further their own personal interests should be considered only on an individual basis.
But I suppose if people only care about policy, then that must make it fine to have corrupt sleazeballs like Hamilton on board, providing they're on-message policy-wise. Hold on a sec.. haven't we been over this before?
I had earlier said that I didn't approve of Hamilton being a part of UKIP infrastructure. However, neutrally, if Hamilton has done nothing illegal, then he has a right to stay.
My God, if we were to kick out every politician who, not illegally, had done something to further personal interests, we would run out of politicians!