-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Time for the Alpha Males?????
- Thread starter jeager106
- Start date
I just hope their alpha doesn't cause foreign alphas to want to butt heads.
This is pretty much why I considered Clinton the safer choice, from the stand point of military violence.
She is well known as a butch with a willingness to fire missiles. Sensible foreign powers wouldn't provoke her. Trump is easily led around by the ego, the evidence of that is extremely well known as well.
So anybody who would benefit from violence just has to provoke him into responding badly.
Tom
Hillary has the even more volatile personality in private.
Wild though he be, she's the pressure cooker ready to explode.'
And even when calm, she likes war.
Your ability to pick and choose the information and sources that support what you prefer to believe is pretty darned partisan.
Tom
I agree 100%.
I think his (Revoltingest) ability is pretty darned good. Accurate also.
'Tis a moot point however. She lost but she's not forgotten, nor will
she be.
I'd be willing to bet she'll be a huge pain in Trumps butt for the next
4 years.
It seems that way to those so devoted to
Hilda that they look away from her record.
Which source of mine don't you like?
Which ones should I add?
Kuzcotopia
If you can read this, you are as lucky as I am.
An alpha males is a leader, and alpha males get others to follow them. Alphas care for the pack, and want the pack they lead to be as successful as possible.
Wanna compare approval ratings?
Kuzcotopia
If you can read this, you are as lucky as I am.
Of course it does.
Anyone can swagger around and pretend. But if no one follows you, you're just fooling yourself.
People follow me.
(Only cuz it's safer than having me follow them.)
That wouldn't be me. I think she is better at corruption and violence and American Exceptionalism than the other options.
That's why she was the top choice of the USA electorate.
You believe Wikileaks, even when they demonstrate their anti-USA and anti-Democrat biases. For some reason (I assume it's because you are a closet Republican) you believe Julian Assange, but not the FBI or CIA or anybody that points out that Trump is a huge liar. He managed to start his campaign promising to back up his claims of business acumen, then lied over and over again about it, and never did.
And your response was "I don't care about his taxes so it doesn't matter that he is a worse liar than Hillary. He told lies that I want to hear!"
Tom
The Emperor of Mankind
Currently the galaxy's spookiest paraplegic
It takes a special kind of cognitive dissonance to go on for ages about Hillary's emails (even after she was cleared repeatedly by the FBI of wrongdoing) but ignore or even brush off the fact that Trump claimed to be awesome at business but wouldn't release his tax returns (like just about every other Presidential candidate) to prove it.
Timothy Bryce
Active Member
Or organising the killing of pet dogs of women her husband raped as a means of threatening them into keeping quiet.
You're using the judgement of the voters as evidence of her superiority?
I'm going to steal that joke.
Btw, she lost the election, & didn't get a majority.
Actually, since you're a card carrying conservative, you're far more Republican than I.
You'd be quite at home with those Log Cabin types.
You criticize Wikileaks for their attitude, but not for inaccuracy.
This should be about facts rather than an emotional reaction to their taking a side.
They have no obligation to be or pretense of being neutral.
Oh, dear......I've made so many posts, & you seem to have absorbed so little.
Everyone has things they care little about, & things they care greatly about.
You don't like my preferences or how I weigh the various candidates' faults,
so you stamp your little feet as you rail against me with histrionics.
(I like that image....I'm picturing you about 5' tall...curly tresses....Buster Brown shoes.)
Last edited:
I'm skeptical of that one.
