Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Follow the lines upwards from each of the ‘persons’ of (in ?) ‘God’.
Follow the lines downwards from ‘God’.
Follow the lines directly downwards from the ‘Father’.
Notice that there are no lines directly connecting ‘Son’ and ‘Holy Spirit’.
There is also a huge anomaly which is obvious in stating the relationship to God of the three persons but never commented on by trinitarian proponents.
Can you spot the ‘Elephant in the room’?
Probably what is wrong with it is that it is completely not understandable?
Jesus, who is our Creator-Son, is a creation of the Trinity, not the second person of Triune Deity which functions as (1).Follow the lines upwards from each of the ‘persons’ of (in ?) ‘God’.
Follow the lines downwards from ‘God’.
Follow the lines directly downwards from the ‘Father’.
Notice that there are no lines directly connecting ‘Son’ and ‘Holy Spirit’.
There is also a huge anomaly which is obvious in stating the relationship to God of the three persons but never commented on by trinitarian proponents.
Can you spot the ‘Elephant in the room’?
No! Because a soul is ‘Spirit in a body’.Probably what is wrong with it is that it is completely not understandable?
Is this one understandable in reference to mankind?
\View attachment 68599
I can’t figure out what you are saying in relation to the diagram presented.Jesus, who is our Creator-Son, is a creation of the Trinity, not the second person of Triune Deity which functions as (1).
Even if it is a duality, though I don't agree with you, do you still get the concept that you are one but each part is distinct?No! Because a soul is ‘Spirit in a body’.
An animal has a Soul also since it too is a Spirit in a body.
What you present is a Venn Diagram which is not a valid way to represent what you think you are presenting!
No!Even if it is a duality, though I don't agree with you, do you still get the concept that you are one but each part is distinct?
If you can grasp the concept (judging spiritual with spiritual) - then insert Father, The Word, and Holy Spirit in the three circles and still one God.No!
How is this related to the diagram under discussion?
Probably what is wrong with it is that it is completely not understandable?
Is this one understandable in reference to mankind?
\View attachment 68599
Exactly what do you not understand from the diagram?Probably what is wrong with it is that it is completely not understandable?
Umm… no! I’m not sure where you get you ideas from but nothing you just said is of any value.If you can grasp the concept (judging spiritual with spiritual) - then insert Father, The Word, and Holy Spirit in the three circles and still one God.
As a side note:
soul - psuche - Gr.
spirit - pneuma - Gr.
Two different words because they are two different parts even though still one.
1 Thess. 5:23 And the very God of peace sanctify you wholly; and I pray God your whole spirit and soul and body be preserved blameless unto the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ.
very distinct and very different and yet one.
The diagram seems to have been developed on an Atari? I've never seen it before.I can’t figure out what you are saying in relation to the diagram presented.
seems like a different gospel?Exactly what do you not understand from the diagram?
It says:
- —--(Going upwards)
- Son of Father
- Son of God
- ——
- Father ‘of God’?
- ——
- Spirit of Father
- Spirit of God
- ___(Downwards)
- God of Father
- God of Son
I think it’s quite simple to understand. Only someone who sees something they don’t want to see would say that they don’t understand it… but yes, I guess seeing the truth would scare someone who doesn’t like seeing the truth. Jesus says it:
- God of Holy Spirit
Just for you: What is wrong ix that there is no such thing as ‘Father OF GOD’.
- ‘The darkness hates the light!’
And, it sets ‘GOD’ as a sentient entity greater than Father, Son, and Holy Spirit… something that is never any kind of truth in the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob.
But yet, that is what trinity plies it’s trade on.
Microsoft wordThe diagram seems to have been developed on an Atari? I've never seen it before.
Obfuscation. It matters not where or on what media it was created. The point is simply to comment on what it represents in terms of the trinity.The diagram seems to have been developed on an Atari? I've never seen it before.
‘And the darkness comprehended not’seems like a different gospel?
It might be the mark of the beast? Or it spent 3 days in the belly of a whale?Obfuscation. It matters not where or on what media it was created. The point is simply to comment on what it represents in terms of the trinity.
12 I have yet many things to say unto you, but ye cannot bear them now.‘And the darkness comprehended not’