paarsurrey
Veteran Member
This has always been part of the truthful religion. Buddha, Krishna, Moses, Zoroaster, Socrates, Jesus never said anything that is against it; rather they supported it.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
And no one said that the Kalama Sutta "supports Atheists." The Kalama Sutta supports critical examination, reliance on oneself, and against blind belief.There is nothing in Kalama Sutta that supports Atheists
This has always been part of the truthful religion. Buddha, Krishna, Moses, Zoroaster, Socrates, Jesus never said anything that is against it; rather they supported it.
And no one said that the Kalama Sutta "supports Atheists." The Kalama Sutta supports critical examination, reliance on oneself, and against blind belief.
The Kalama Sutta has been part of other religions? No, I think the Kalama Sutta is rather unique to Buddhism. (Yes I've heard the Bible quote "test all things, hold on to the good.")
.
Being from different regions and different languages; they had different names and terminology;they meant the same things; none is against it.
Please quote from any of them who supported blind faith.
Source?Buddha had to be unique as he had a converse with the ONE- the Creator God and became in His image like other perfect men founders of other religions whom their followers consider unique in personality and teachings as they also had a Converse with Him and became in His image.
One may enquire into it from them if one likes.
Buddha had to be unique as he had a converse with the ONE- the Creator God and became in His image like other perfect men founders of other religions whom their followers consider unique in personality and teachings as they also had a Converse with Him and became in His image.
One may enquire into it from them if one likes.
Source?
Moses brought the law from Mt. Sinai. Moses was unique in that he spoke with God "face to face."
People of the Bible: Moses
Buddha had to be unique as he had a converse with the ONE- the Creator God and became in His image like other perfect men founders of other religions whom their followers consider unique in personality and teachings as they also had a Converse with Him and became in His image.
One may enquire into it from them if one likes.
Source?
Moses brought the law from Mt. Sinai. Moses was unique in that he spoke with God "face to face."
People of the Bible: Moses
Nice dodge. But please do address the question.
Kalama Sutra
There are elements of the above in other scriptures and Writings in my opinion...
.....
....
The third method of understanding is by tradition -- that is, through the text of the Holy Scriptures -- for people say, "In the Old and New Testaments, God spoke thus." This method equally is not perfect, because the traditions are understood by the reason. As the reason itself is liable to err,
In other words, you have no reliable source of Buddha conversing with God.
Ah, so then Descartes, Paine, Spinoza, Rousseau, etc. all spoke to the "Creator God".The word "enlightenment" in itself a proof that Buddha had it from the Creator God.
This has always been part of the truthful religion. Buddha, Krishna, Moses, Zoroaster, Socrates, Jesus never said anything that is against it; rather they supported it.
I agree with you that that view is wrong. Buddha was always pointing to the transendental.
Ah, so then Descartes, Paine, Spinoza, Rousseau, etc. all spoke to the "Creator God".
Enlightenment thinkers all.
I agree with your above words.