The truth behind Ron Wyatt's archaeological discoveries.

[Audie]

Being facetious only makes you look like a sore loser.

I see you are really into cliche responses,
and use t hem with gay disregard to whether
they apply.

The thing I said about Neptune is not me being facetious.
I was told that in all seriousness by someone has as much
chance of being correct as you do, and could hardly be more
gullible than you.

 

[Ebionite]

I see you are really into cliche responses,
and use t hem with gay disregard to whether
they apply.

But you are a sore loser.

The thing I said about Neptune is not me being facetious.
I was told that in all seriousness by someone has as much
chance of being correct as you do, and could hardly be more
gullible than you.

Why would anyone believe that?
Pointing out that there's evidence to support the Biblical account of the Red Sea crossing doesn't make me gullible.

 

[sooda]

But you are a sore loser.


Why would anyone believe that?
Pointing out that there's evidence to support the Biblical account of the Red Sea crossing doesn't make me gullible.

There is NO evidence for the Exodus much less any crossing of the Red Sea.

The sill depth at Nuweiba is 780 meters (2,560 feet). No wind that ever blew on this planet would blow that crossing dry.

 

[Ebionite]

There is NO evidence for the Exodus much less any crossing of the Red Sea.

Except for the Biblical account, the seafloor map, and the chariot wheel photo, and some archaeological support for Joseph in Egypt.

https://christiananswers.net/q-abr/abr-a027.html

The sill depth at Nuweiba is 780 meters (2,560 feet). No wind that ever blew on this planet would blow that crossing dry.

Except for something like the wind described in the book of Genesis.

 

[sooda]

Except for the Biblical account, the seafloor map, and the chariot wheel photo, and some archaeological support for Joseph in Egypt.

https://christiananswers.net/q-abr/abr-a027.html


Except for something like the wind described in the book of Genesis.

There is no chariot wheel photo.. Wyatt would have had to have a diving bell to photograph the Red Sea Floor.

The Red Sea Floor has been mapped and its WAAAAY too deep.

Genesis? You are talking about Noah's flood.. also an epic myth.. and supposedly it took the "wind" a year to dry out the earth.. Yet the Ark was not destroyed by such a powerful wind.

 

[Wandering Monk]

Except for the Biblical account, the seafloor map, and the chariot wheel photo, and some archaeological support for Joseph in Egypt.

https://christiananswers.net/q-abr/abr-a027.html


Except for something like the wind described in the book of Genesis.

And how do you know this is a chariot wheel? Is it in a lab or museum somewhere? Has it been examined and confirmed by ANY archaeologist?

 

[Ebionite]

And how do you know this is a chariot wheel?

I don't, but it's the best explanation for the facts.

 

[Ebionite]

There is no chariot wheel photo.. Wyatt would have had to have a diving bell to photograph the Red Sea Floor.

You're assuming that the photo was taken in a deep part of the Red Sea, the lighting suggests that it wasn't.

 

[sooda]

You're assuming that the photo was taken in a deep part of the Red Sea, the lighting suggests that it wasn't.

LOLOL.. Ron Wyatt was a conman.. Have you been to the Red Sea? I have and I was a SCUBA diver. If there were chariot wheels in shallow water the Saudis or Egyptians would have retrieved them.

The sill depth at Nuweiba is 780 meters (2,560 feet). You think you could get 3 million people and another 6 million goats across that depth?

 

[Ebionite]

LOLOL.. Ron Wyatt was a conman.

Where's your proof?

 

[sooda]

Where's your proof?

Ron Wyatt Exposed - remnantofgod.org
remnantofgod.org/wyatt.htm
The man Ron Wyatt died almost 14 years ago before he could prove he actually found the ark under that rock. Worse yet, the man was a Seventh Day Adventist in …


Ron Wyatt: Collosal Fraud | ScienceBlogs
https://scienceblogs.com/dispatches/2006/06/30/ron-wyatt-collosal-fraud
Nov 16, 2006 · Noah's ark was discovered by Ron Wyatt, whose ministry is named Wyatt Archeological Research. The news media is only taking attention away from the real ark through your ministry. Please stop this approach in the name of Jesus.

1. Ron Wyatt Was a Scam Artist - biblocality.com
   Ron Wyatt Was a Scam ArtistRon-Wyatt-Was-a-Scam-Artist
   Oct 06, 2010 · Further evidence to show you Ron Wyatt is not born-again is that he says premillennialism is a fantasy. He says he is amillennial in this video. In other words, he was never saved by the Son of God (for God) who will return to reign for 1000 years on earth as the Son of Man (for man).
   
   
2. Love of Money At Wyatt Archaeological Research And Israeli ...
   https://www.tentmaker.org/WAR/love_money_wyatt.html
   It takes a good con-man to really pull it off. Ron Wyatt has been among the best. He raised many tens of thousands of dollars from naïve Bible believers for his “expeditions.” During these expeditions, Wyatt would enjoy traveling around the world, often living in nice hotels with a traveling girl friend companion.
   
   
3. Ron Wyatt - RationalWiki
   https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Ron_Wyatt
   Ron Wyatt (1933 - 1999) was a pseudoarchaeologist famed for alleged discoveries of material evidence in support of some of the major events recorded in the Bible. His work was typically rejected by mainstream archaeology and Christians alike, the bulk of his support coming from the more extreme fringes of evangelical Christianity .
   

 

[Ebionite]

The man Ron Wyatt died almost 14 years ago before he could prove he actually found the ark under that rock.

Not proving a claim doesn't make someone a conman.

 

[Wandering Monk]

I don't, but it's the best explanation for the facts.

What facts are you referring to?

 

[SkepticThinker]

Not proving a claim doesn't make someone a conman.

It does if you're claiming that you've found a particular thing when you actually didn't.

 

[Audie]

But you are a sore loser.


Why would anyone believe that?
Pointing out that there's evidence to support the Biblical account of the Red Sea crossing doesn't make me gullible.

Now you are just name calling. Trashy behaviour, that.

Why would anyone believe that?

Why? A lack of common sense, and
being immersed in a culture of belief in magic
I suppose.
You could well ask the same of anyone
who believes their talking snake book.
Or believes R Wyatt.

There is no evidence to support the biblical account
of any supernatural event, including the "crossing",
so yes, believing it does mean you are being gullible.

(to gull, : to take advantage of (one who is foolish or unwary)

Your reference to the "chariot wheel" belies any claim
you may have that you are not easily gulled.

 

[Audie]

Not proving a claim doesn't make someone a conman.

That is quite the semantic contortion you are
employing there.
Does it convince you?

 

[Audie]

Where's your proof?

UH, like, none of his claims can be verified?
That eh makes Indian Jones look like a girl scout?

How about his claim that a natural rock formation is
noahs ark?

Either a conman or incredibly gullible
and stupid himself.

 

[Audie]

I don't, but it's the best explanation for the facts.

Please tell us the facts.

 

[sooda]

Not proving a claim doesn't make someone a conman.

Educated people knew Wyatt was a joke long before he died.

He was definitely a conman and he bilked a lot of people into supporting his lifestyle.

 

[Ebionite]

It does if you're claiming that you've found a particular thing when you actually didn't.

What specific claim do you think that he made that was disproven?