The Mystic way of knowing (for the skeptics)

[George-ananda]

"Scientific" as in figuring out why the car wont start.

As for what is important, take your misty magicy
way of meeting reality back to the stone age and see
if your line ever even maintains a grip on the paleolithic.

Keep your scientific car parked in the mid 20th century if you want. Some of us will drive into the new centuries with fair open minds..

 

[Audie]

Keep your scientific car parked in the mid 20th century if you want. Some of us will drive into the new centuries with fair open minds..

Hahs. Right. We have seen your demo of your
way of knowing. You make things up.
That will work fine if your future is in a sheltered
workshop.

 

[George-ananda]

Hahs. Right. We have seen your demo of your
way of knowing. You make things up.
That will work fine if your future is in a sheltered
workshop.

Apparently, you are growing not worth talking to.

 

[Audie]

Apparently, you are growing not worth talking to.

Uh, no. You dont like the light shined on you.

 

[sun rise]

As for what is important, take your misty magicy
way of meeting reality back to the stone age and see
if your line ever even maintains a grip on the paleolithic.

That's quite some dogmatic rant. Those who attack something are closer to it than those who are indifferent.

 

[Audie]

That's quite some dogmatic rant. Those who attack something are closer to it than those who are indifferent.

I asked for you guys to give an example of something
you mystically know.
Tnx, tho GA already gave an example.
Another is nice tho!

Your mystic way of knowing is just making things up,
as you so nicely showed us here.!

 

[sun rise]

I asked for you guys to give an example of something
you mystically know.
Tnx, tho GA already gave an example.
Another is nice tho!

Your mydtic way of knowing is just making things up,
as you so nicely showed us here.i

You've already made up your mind so why should I waste time writing about something you'll dismiss? From my days as an atheist, I could write the refutation myself because my knowledge can't be replicated in a lab on demand.

 

[Audie]

You've already made up your mind so why should I waste time writing about something you'll dismiss? From my days as an atheist, I could write the refutation myself because my knowledge can't be replicated in a lab on demand.

Of right! It us my fault that you have nothing.

Exceptin' what you blatantly make up.

 

[sun rise]

Of right! It us my fault that you have nothing.

Exceptin' what you blatantly make up.

If you want to argue against mystical experiences having a higher validity, you'd get further if you used the reductionistic studies such as those documented here: Neuroscience of religion - Wikipedia and How Does Neuroscience Explain Spiritual and Religious Experiences?

 

[Audie]

If you want to argue against mystical experiences having a higher validity, you'd get further if you used the reductionistic studies such as those documented here: Neuroscience of religion - Wikipedia and How Does Neuroscience Explain Spiritual and Religious Experiences?

Smile away, your nor the ga can give an example of
anyyhing, exceptin' what you make up. Noteworthy
that neither of you can admit to making things up
and try to make your failure into my deficiency.

Honest folks have no reason to behave so.

 

[sun rise]

Smile away, your nor the ga can give an example of
anyyhing, exceptin' what you make up. Noteworthy
that neither of you can admit to making things up
and try to make your failure into my deficiency.

Honest folks have no reason to behave so.

Sadly you did not even respond to my last post offering atheists a better way to argue for atheism except by a non-sequitur. So I won't bother posting any more in response to your posts here because you're not even reading what I write but just repeating what you've already written.

 

[Audie]

Sadly you did not even respond to my last post offering atheists a better way to argue for atheism except by a non-sequitur. So I won't bother posting any more in response to your posts here because you're not even reading what I write but just repeating what you've already written.

Ah you want me to study how to argue for atheism?
Speaking of non seq!
I am not arguing for atheism.

I am asking you to in some way substantate your
rather outlandish claims. Heck, maybe you know
something? You come in all flags and trumpets,
but nothing else to show? So far, that is it.

And yeah, I repeated it because all you did was
come up withba new twist on blaming ME for
YOUR (abject) failure to show your special
access to "knowedge" is anything but you
repeatedly making things up.

Your "wont bother to post is a thin figleaf behind
which to pretend you are not fleeing the interview.

Good enough timing. No need for another go round
with the mystical empty set.