mikkel_the_dane
My own religion
Now this is kind of a joke. I will use the idea of proof, evidence, truth and what not, so show that all of these ideas have a limit.
Part 1: If you accept that some types of your behavior have limits, e.g. because gravity limits your mobility, I will show that proof or any of its variant also have a limit. If you deny that there is limit, you are in effect denying that, what you are experiencing now, is real. That is the methodology of testing I use. I don't test using objective proof. I use subjectivity and accept that it also has limit, but it still works in a limited sense.
Part 2:
The test involves if everything is objective, subjective or a combination and the rest of this test is not an observation as per science, but a first person experience of a negative feeling.
So here it goes. Any experience of a contradiction, i.e. cognitive dissonance, is first person as a non-observation. You don't see that it doesn't make sense. You feel that it doesn't make sense.
Part 3:
The psychology of logic is as follows: Something can't make sense as being and not being in one sense and not when you think about it. Now the limit of this is that everything is not a thing. It is in effect the combination of different times, spaces and senses, but if you treat everything as the same, I can mess with your mind.
Part 4:
So here it goes:
Everything is objective as per science or God whether it be physical or as with idealism. It really doesn't matter what word is used. What matters is the methodology or rather psychology/cognition used:
In the formal sense of all cases it goes like this:
Someone: Everything is in effect X and not Y.
Someone else: No, everything is in effect Y and not X.
Me: The fact that you both can disagree, is explained in the following sense. Everything is not just one factor or category of factors for which all other are wrong. And that is so, because you both use that to deny the other person's use of it, while assuming that you are not doing it.
Part 5:
The limit of logic is this. Something can't at a given time, space and sense be different as not being in that time, space and sense, but something else can at a different given time, space and sense. Now remove all time, space and senses except one sense and compare it to another. I am me of all time, space and senses so you can't be you, because that is a contradiction. Well, no, but that is how some people do it in effect.
They in effect in their individual brains reduce away time and space and all the different senses but one and in a psychological sense do the following in effect.
Everything must as a positive make sense in one sense. They all do that at a given time, space and sense, but assume it applies to everything for all time, space and only in one sense. They can of course do that subjectively and they don't understand how I can do it in another sense, because that doesn't make sense to them.
Here it is an observation of the inner mental effect of this:
"No one can believe that the same thing can (at the same time) be and not be." Aristotle.
What they do, is to remove time and space and all other differences than one and treat everything as one thing and thus all other things or senses are false.
Part 6:
For example for everything is physical, it is in effect a meta-category of different process, because there is no one universal one physical process(sense), but if someone treat physical as one sense, you get this result:
Someone: Everything is physical.
Me: No!
The result is the same of the One True God.
Someone: Everything is from the One True God.
Me: No!
Part 7:
So how is this connected to biology? Well, because of the effect of the replication of the best adapted and most fit gene. That is in effect subjective, because it takes place in different lifeforms and that includes you and me. The effect is that the causation as cause and effect takes place in the given individual and is not objective, because it happens in a subject as subjective.
And this causation among different individuals can't be reduced down to only one universal one, which is all the same for time, space and senses as to only one sense.
Hi you. I predict the following: If you are of those who do "everything is X", you can continue to do so and that includes that I can't really do it differently, because it is utterly objectively meaningless for all humans including me and not just you.
I have been told that for over 20 years now by some humans, but somehow I am still here.
It also goes for truth, rationality, justified reason and what not. If you in effect treat your own individual subjectivity as universal for all humans, I just test if I can do it differently subjectively and if I can I have in effect falsified your claim. But because it is subjective, you can subjectively deny its relevance.
So here it is for the rules of trying to convert you to my belief system. I really don't care for that in a sense. You can remain you and do you as you. But if the idea of that you and I ought to be come a "we", then it comes at a price. I will only accept that "we" if you accept that we have to agree on a subjective set of beliefs for which there is no universal truth, proof or what not.
I do want us all to come together as one. I am just aware of that this is not how reality works in practice and I accept that. But I won't stop trying, but I am realistic about the chance of it working. I predict it won't. So:
Regards and love
Mikkel. apparently not really a part of reality according to some humans.
Part 1: If you accept that some types of your behavior have limits, e.g. because gravity limits your mobility, I will show that proof or any of its variant also have a limit. If you deny that there is limit, you are in effect denying that, what you are experiencing now, is real. That is the methodology of testing I use. I don't test using objective proof. I use subjectivity and accept that it also has limit, but it still works in a limited sense.
Part 2:
The test involves if everything is objective, subjective or a combination and the rest of this test is not an observation as per science, but a first person experience of a negative feeling.
So here it goes. Any experience of a contradiction, i.e. cognitive dissonance, is first person as a non-observation. You don't see that it doesn't make sense. You feel that it doesn't make sense.
Part 3:
The psychology of logic is as follows: Something can't make sense as being and not being in one sense and not when you think about it. Now the limit of this is that everything is not a thing. It is in effect the combination of different times, spaces and senses, but if you treat everything as the same, I can mess with your mind.
Part 4:
So here it goes:
Everything is objective as per science or God whether it be physical or as with idealism. It really doesn't matter what word is used. What matters is the methodology or rather psychology/cognition used:
In the formal sense of all cases it goes like this:
Someone: Everything is in effect X and not Y.
Someone else: No, everything is in effect Y and not X.
Me: The fact that you both can disagree, is explained in the following sense. Everything is not just one factor or category of factors for which all other are wrong. And that is so, because you both use that to deny the other person's use of it, while assuming that you are not doing it.
Part 5:
The limit of logic is this. Something can't at a given time, space and sense be different as not being in that time, space and sense, but something else can at a different given time, space and sense. Now remove all time, space and senses except one sense and compare it to another. I am me of all time, space and senses so you can't be you, because that is a contradiction. Well, no, but that is how some people do it in effect.
They in effect in their individual brains reduce away time and space and all the different senses but one and in a psychological sense do the following in effect.
Everything must as a positive make sense in one sense. They all do that at a given time, space and sense, but assume it applies to everything for all time, space and only in one sense. They can of course do that subjectively and they don't understand how I can do it in another sense, because that doesn't make sense to them.
Here it is an observation of the inner mental effect of this:
"No one can believe that the same thing can (at the same time) be and not be." Aristotle.
What they do, is to remove time and space and all other differences than one and treat everything as one thing and thus all other things or senses are false.
Part 6:
For example for everything is physical, it is in effect a meta-category of different process, because there is no one universal one physical process(sense), but if someone treat physical as one sense, you get this result:
Someone: Everything is physical.
Me: No!
The result is the same of the One True God.
Someone: Everything is from the One True God.
Me: No!
Part 7:
So how is this connected to biology? Well, because of the effect of the replication of the best adapted and most fit gene. That is in effect subjective, because it takes place in different lifeforms and that includes you and me. The effect is that the causation as cause and effect takes place in the given individual and is not objective, because it happens in a subject as subjective.
And this causation among different individuals can't be reduced down to only one universal one, which is all the same for time, space and senses as to only one sense.
Hi you. I predict the following: If you are of those who do "everything is X", you can continue to do so and that includes that I can't really do it differently, because it is utterly objectively meaningless for all humans including me and not just you.
I have been told that for over 20 years now by some humans, but somehow I am still here.
It also goes for truth, rationality, justified reason and what not. If you in effect treat your own individual subjectivity as universal for all humans, I just test if I can do it differently subjectively and if I can I have in effect falsified your claim. But because it is subjective, you can subjectively deny its relevance.
So here it is for the rules of trying to convert you to my belief system. I really don't care for that in a sense. You can remain you and do you as you. But if the idea of that you and I ought to be come a "we", then it comes at a price. I will only accept that "we" if you accept that we have to agree on a subjective set of beliefs for which there is no universal truth, proof or what not.
I do want us all to come together as one. I am just aware of that this is not how reality works in practice and I accept that. But I won't stop trying, but I am realistic about the chance of it working. I predict it won't. So:
Regards and love
Mikkel. apparently not really a part of reality according to some humans.
Last edited: