• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Are You Any of the Below?

  • Psychopath

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Sociopath

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Malignant Narcissists

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Unspecified Antisocial Disorder

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    8

The Reverend Bob

Fart Machine and Beastmaster
The bad news about psychopath is they might be an evolutionary adaptation
The good news about them, they are proof that human evolution is ongoing
 

A Vestigial Mote

Well-Known Member
The bad news about psychopath is they might be an evolutionary adaptation
The good news about them, they are proof that human evolution is ongoing
Well, you won't necessarily see humanity moving "toward" psychopathy/sociopathy. In order for a particular mutation/difference in traits to become the "norm", there needs to be an advantage great enough to see species members with that trait surviving long enough to procreate where others without that trait tend to die and not produce offspring. What you're discussing tends to just "show up" in a low percentage of population and isn't overly advantageous beyond humans with other dispositions. Also, as a standing fact of evolution, all forms are necessarily "between forms", and changes are ongoing - humans are in a somewhat interesting niche within our ecosystems because there are almost no selective pressures acting on us in modern times. That is... nothing killing certain members off at a rate large enough to affect procreation of "select" members with like survival traits. So any changes in human populations in our modern times is going to probably happen even more slowly and haphazardly because... well, nearly everyone lives to procreate - even those with poor eyesight, or who are prone to heart conditions, or pass on predisposition to cancer.
 

The Reverend Bob

Fart Machine and Beastmaster
Well, you won't necessarily see humanity moving "toward" psychopathy/sociopathy. In order for a particular mutation/difference in traits to become the "norm", there needs to be an advantage great enough to see species members with that trait surviving long enough to procreate where others without that trait tend to die and not produce offspring. What you're discussing tends to just "show up" in a low percentage of population and isn't overly advantageous beyond humans with other dispositions. Also, as a standing fact of evolution, all forms are necessarily "between forms", and changes are ongoing - humans are in a somewhat interesting niche within our ecosystems because there are almost no selective pressures acting on us in modern times. That is... nothing killing certain members off at a rate large enough to affect procreation of "select" members with like survival traits. So any changes in human populations in our modern times is going to probably happen even more slowly and haphazardly because... well, nearly everyone lives to procreate - even those with poor eyesight, or who are prone to heart conditions, or pass on predisposition to cancer.
I didn't say it was necessarily going to be a successful adaptation, but it is hypothetically not a mental illness but an adaptation
 

Saint Frankenstein

Wanderer From Afar
Premium Member
Why would they show up to your "come one, come all and see the freaks" thread the way you talk about them? They are people too, and most of them know they are "off" but thats no reason to assume they think they ha e glory, see everybody as worms, or that others have to bow to their whims.
The vast majority of them aren't violent, either.
 

A Vestigial Mote

Well-Known Member
I didn't say it was necessarily going to be a successful adaptation, but it is hypothetically not a mental illness but an adaptation
I didn't say it was necessarily going to be a successful adaptation, but it is hypothetically not a mental illness but an adaptation
And adaptation to what though? What are the pressures in our environment(s) that would lead someone to be better adapted to their situation under psychopathy or sociopathy?
 
Top