Ceridwen018
Well-Known Member
For all of Bible-believers who do not subscribe to a literal interpretation of the Bible, how do you justify your reformed view?
I've never quite understood how it is that Noah and the Tower of Bable are mere "stories included to teach lessons, etc.", while the resurrection is considered fact, written in stone.
If one is fact, what makes you so sure that the others aren't as well? Inversely, if one is fictional, how can you be sure that the entire book doesn't follow suit?
I've never quite understood how it is that Noah and the Tower of Bable are mere "stories included to teach lessons, etc.", while the resurrection is considered fact, written in stone.
If one is fact, what makes you so sure that the others aren't as well? Inversely, if one is fictional, how can you be sure that the entire book doesn't follow suit?