That's quite disputable, given that you swallow creationism.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
The evolution of the eye
- Thread starter shunyadragon
- Start date
That's quite disputable, given that you swallow creationism.
This discussion is not about creationism. It is about real science, and theories with no evidence do not qualify.
I can prove any science mentioned in the Bible and you cant prove anything mentioned in the THEORY of evolution. You have jumped on the wrong train. It is going in the wrong direction.
These are very self incriminating statements
Why?
Your ability to delude yourself is indisputable and, in fact, more than a little sad.
. . . and tragic.
Why not? Even if ignored by some with a religious agenda, they are informative for those that desire the knowledge,
The first reference was a bit advanced for some forum members, The reference added from Curiosity Stream is a good one for the layman.
So you have no answer therefore put up a wall by repeating the question.
Read the post and stop asking others to think for you
That's not too hard to do. Honestly, it isn't
Your inability to understand what scientific evidence consist of, is far worse than sad.
Satans_Serrated_Edge
Deicidal
Odd I am a scientist, a geologist, soil scientist, and a hydrogeologist. I worked forty years as geologist and soil scientist. I have a number of publication in a soil science journal.
What are your qualifications that would reflect you understand scientific evidence? How do you define scientific evidence?
DavidFirth
Well-Known Member
Correction:
This thread addresses only the supposed evolution of a simple form to the complex.
Since science does not prove anything. how can you prove any science mentioned in the Bible? Any examples of what you can prove?
How can you prove the Aristotelian (Ptolemaic system) astronomy described in Genesis?
I have quit reading evo links, but I will say your link offered no real scientific evidence. Cut and paste the evidence they offered. Now is you chance to prove me wrong.
One does not need a degree in science to understand basic science. One can have a degree in science and not understand some aspects of science. Science has been wrong in the past and it is likely some of what they say today is wrong also.
When you can explain how a offspring can receive a characteristic not in the gene pool of it parents, I will reconsider evolution.
The only way something can be proved is for it to be repeated and observed.
Satans_Serrated_Edge
Deicidal
Why would I do that? Evidence can't sway you, it would be a waste of time.
That link was for reasonable readers.
DavidFirth
Well-Known Member
It is all assumed knowledge, none of it can be proved. As is all of macro-evolution.