Sunstone said:
I believe I've noticed that clinging not only leads to emotional pain for us, but also emotional and mental confusion. Would you agree?
Yes
Furthermore, clinging seems to cause certain behaviors that are both socially and individually undesireable, such as greed, lust (or clinging sexuality), and so forth. Would you agree?
Again, yes.
Do you think there's a correspondence of sorts between the Buddist conception of clinging and the Christian conception of sin?
Not really. I'd say that the close correspondence is between the the Buddhist idea and the Christian idea of the Passions. In the Buddhist case, clinging to things leads us to evil actions and sorrow and in the Christian one, allowing the Passions free reign leads to sin. There is a further similarity between the Orthodox concept of sin and Buddhism in that rather than seeing sin as a crime against God we see it as a falling short, an imperfection or a spiritual sickness. It seems to me that this is closer (though not identical) to eastern than western ideas in general.
I'm not familiar with what hesychasm means? Should I google it, or would it be easy enough for you to explain it?
It's fairly easy to explain briefly. It's basically the spiritual practice of Orthodox Christianity, an effort to empty ourselves of the passions and pray ceaselessly. It bears some surface similarities to Buddhist meditation, though the purpose is different. This link explains a little further:
http://www.orthodoxwiki.org/Hesychasm
In Orthodox Christianity, who is saved? Is salvation open to everyone who confesses Christ? Is it a possibility even for those who do not confess Christ? Is something involved in salvation besides or other than confessing Christ?
Nobody is saved in this life. Salvation is a process rather than an event. To understand this it would be helpful to understand Theosis which you should also be able to find at the orthodoxwiki site linked to above. In order to be saved we must run the race to the end. There is no assurance of salvation. There's a lot more to it than simple confession of Christ. We trust that those who don't know Christ may also be brought to God by His mercy and although we know where the Church is we do not know where it is not. We believe even non-Christians may be saved as God wills that all men be saved but we believe more is expected of those who receive more (i.e. us). We believe that our Church is the best and most complete way to God but we do not deny the possibility of others being drawn to God outside the Church. I could go on, but ask if you have further questions.
How long will the US and UK be in Iran?
Hopefully we'll never go into Iran. If you meant Iraq, though, whilst I hope we will be out reasonably soon, I fear that we will be bogged down until eventually forced to leave due to what appears to be the brewing civil war. God willing my hopes rather than fears may come true.
Have you ever seen a bird fly upside down? If so, when, where, and what kind of bird?
No.
Should marijuana be legalized?
Yes. I'm not in favour of prohibitions as I feel they do more harm than good. I started smoking at school (tobacco first, later pot) precisely because I wasn't allowed to. I'm sure many teenagers have a similar (stupid) attitude.
What's the second and third most important challenges facing primary and secondary level (grade school through high school in the US) teachers today?
I don't really know. The first one is probably discipline. Second and third I'm not sure about. Political correctness gone mad (e.g. pupils actually been taken seriously when they cry wolf about sexual or physical abuse before any attempt at an investigation is even made) and earning enough money to make a decent living doing the job they love springs to mind.
Ever met an intellectual snob?
Yes
What did you think of him or her?
Not a lot. I must admit to having felt guilty delight at seeing them put in their place by one of my philosophy lecturers. that happened frequently.
Without publically ranking them, who are three of your top seven favorite RF posters and why are each of them a favorite?
Michel - because he's just such a nice and reasonable man.
Booko - because she impresses me with her knowledgeable posts
Feathers - same sort of reason as Michel (apart from the man part)
What's the weather like in your neck of the woods today?
Awful. Cold, grey and raining since I got up this morning.
Do you have a sport you play?
Not exactly. I like sea (shore) fishing and running and I'd like to take up kendo. I'm not really into team sports, though I used to play rugby (union).
Yes. Very much
Can a Fripplethrasher beat a Snortmover at his own game?
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Will you teach your daughter to dance when she's older?
If I can remember how by then I'll teach her some Latin ballroom (Tango is my favourite). My wife can deal with the Romanian folk dancing.
What seems at his age today the most likely career your son will take up apart, of course, from replacing Tarzan?
We sometimes jokingly refer to him as the monk, so that's a possibility. He chose a cross from a tray of items on his first birthday (strange Romanian custom), likes to go to the Divine Liturgy, once followed Father around 'censing' people with a stuffed toy of Melman the giraffe and, the clincher, absolutely hates meat.
Do you feel culturally closer to Americans, Canadians, Australians, New Zealanders, or South Africans? Why?
South Africans. I've known several and their Boer background was sufficiently similar to my German side of the family to be extremely familiar.
Did the British run their empire better, worse, or about the same as the Americans are mucking through being the world's only superpower today?
Well, I think the British are more efficient at such things than Americans and the British military seems to have been more capable (I'm talking soldiers, not equipment here), but I'm not sure either of those things are good, given my feelings about Empire. I'd see both culture's failings as equally bad but different.
James