• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The Definition Of "libertarian"

Tarheeler

Argumentative Curmudgeon
Premium Member
Just because you say it does not make it true. Survival dictates it can't be true.

A lot of people, especially in the US, have a hard time differentiating between voluntary socialism, which is what libertarian socialists advocate, and the state socialism as seen in the USSR and China.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Just because you say it does not make it true. Survival dictates it can't be true.
I don't even believe in "true".
But I do argue based upon commonly accepted definitions.
Does "survival" necessitate the prohibition of an employer
& a worker voluntarily bargaining their relationship?
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
A lot of people, especially in the US, have a hard time differentiating between voluntary socialism, which is what libertarian socialists advocate, and the state socialism as seen in the USSR and China.
If Badran (staff guy) is correct, then US usage would prevail.
Consider how the media use the term "libertarian".
When I hear it on NPR, or see it in the domestic news, I take notice.
(It's cuz I'm hyper-sensitive to the term...you know being a fire breathing
card carrying member of the party.) It unfailingly refers to the lunatic
fringe which advocates both social & economic liberty (liberty in the
sense of lack of gov infringement upon the individual). When Diane Rehm
(leftish NPR talk host) wants the libertarian perspective, she invites the
Cato Institute...never anyone advocating socialist impositions.

The trouble we have here is that we see every definition under the sun
to define political & economic groups, mixing both Americastanian &
Europestanian definitions. Our new definitions are unclear, & I argue
overly inclusive.

Hey, this is the most traffic this section has seen in awhile.
We're few in number, but feisty on the rare occasions we assemble.
 
Last edited:

Alceste

Vagabond
A lot of people, especially in the US, have a hard time differentiating between voluntary socialism, which is what libertarian socialists advocate, and the state socialism as seen in the USSR and China.

I have noticed that myself. Perhaps it's the consequence of a whole generation of anti-Soviet propaganda and histrionics during the cold war. Can't be easy for Americans to shake the spectre of the "evil communist" after all that indoctrination.
 

Iti oj

Global warming is real and we need to act
Premium Member
I don't even believe in "true".
But I do argue based upon commonly accepted definitions.
Does "survival" necessitate the prohibition of an employer
& a worker voluntarily bargaining their relationship?

When some one other then you controlls production, food and land. Nothing about your association is free.
 

Alceste

Vagabond
I don't even believe in "true".
But I do argue based upon commonly accepted definitions.
Does "survival" necessitate the prohibition of an employer
& a worker voluntarily bargaining their relationship?

Libertarian socialists do not advocate prohibiting any form of free association. We just reject the capitalist paradigm for ourselves and others of like mind.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Let's consider measures of membership.

Political Compass
It's popular here on RF. It has "left libertarian" & "right libertarian".
But it's arguably European in origin.
Ref:
Political compass - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The labels given to the different fields and axes on the compass are based on long-standing European and Commonwealth terminology, which can be different from those used in the politics of the United States[citation needed].
The Politicalcompass.org website does not reveal the people behind it, beyond the fact that it seems to be based in the UK.[5][6] According to the New York Times, the site is the work of Wayne Brittenden, a political journalist.[2] According to Tom Utley, writing in the Daily Telegraph, the site is connected to One World Action, a charity founded by Glenys Kinnock, and to Kinnock herself.[7] An early version of the site was published on One World Action's web server.[8]

The Nolan Chart
It's unpopular here. (I might be its only fan.)
275px-Nolan-chart.svg.png

A variant of it is used in the World's Smallest Political Quiz.
It's Americastanian in origin. Note that there is only "libertarian", ie, no left or right flavors.
This usage reflects both the Americastanian Libertarian Party & the Canuckistanian Libertarian Party.
I argue that this is more consistent with the stated RF standard of US usage.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Rev ignored this
Not quite....my plate is full, & you are dessert.
(I'm transplanting seedlings, watching TV, eating, posting here & posting there.)
So stop complaining that I'm not answering all your posts fast enuf...poopy brain!

This one looked like a joke...
BTW I feel forced into my associates.
I can't help how you feel, except to say that you should examine all
your choices, & make the best ones in your interest.
Sometimes we have very limited choices though....IRS audits don't
let me select the agent. Although...I became friendly with one once.
 
Last edited:

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Yeah, he ignored all my posts to the same effect as well. It's hard work pretending there's no such thing as anarchosocialism. ;)
This is another example of your dishonesty, since I've openly advocated
anarchosocialism, which is based entirely on voluntary relationships.
While you might be a fan of it too, as a member of the socialist forum,
you have advocated government imposition.....not very libertarian.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
When some one other then you controlls production, food and land. Nothing about your association is free.
It seems you use a different definition of "free".
Freedom isn't about being guaranteed necessities, eg, food, housing, phones.
It's about your liberty to start a company, work for whom you want, hire
whom you want, worship any god/pasta you want, marry whomever you
want, etc. That other people own things does not infringe upon this.
 
Top