Scott1
Well-Known Member
linwood,
I still can't see what point you are trying to make....
Peace,
Scott
Uhhhhh, yep... should my opposition be based on style? that the word Gnostic hurts my mouth?Your opposition to the Gnostics is based in your current beliefs and echo some of the same reasoning the Orthodoxy used to proclaim them heretics.
Truth? Not quite..... do you have a timeline to back that up?The truth of the matter is that many of the very first people to call themselves followers of Christ believed in these gospels.
WHAT? Equally evil is ok with you? Kinda like "jumbo shrimp"Yes both were equally evil..EQUALLY...not like the Christian ideology today where woman bears the greater burden of original sin.
The overall point is that men were not seen as superior to women as in todays Christian dogma...they were equals.
I still can't see what point you are trying to make....
Yes, they are "inequitable" and ALWAYS will be. What moral code do you live by that tells you this is somehow "wrong" .... and why should that apply to me or my Church?The leadership roles for women are inequitable, a woman can never bring herself to any position of power even close to that a man can.
You can`t even argue this point until there is a woman cardinal giving Mass.
What kind of knowledge? FAITH? I am suprised that these deists are such darlings to you......... are they not foolish enough to believe in God?"Knowledge will bring enlightenment!!" was another cry of the Gnostics.
The whole theology was based on a heirarchy of enlightenment, the more "truth" they became aware of the more spiritually powerful you became.
Kinda like having to "filter it through Catholic canon" ..............Perhaps I am a bit biased towards these disowned Christians much of their dogma mirrors my own beliefs.
Peace,
Scott