• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Suppression of Free Speech on Covid

Ebionite

Well-Known Member
And you posted to me again.
You can deny my charms,
but you can't resist them.
Saying what I think of your kind would probably earn me a ban.


U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) officials Dr. Janet Woodcock, principal deputy commissioner of food and drugs and Peter Marks, M.D., Ph.D., director of the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, knew about COVID-19 vaccine injuries in early 2021, according to documents obtained by Children’s Health Defense (CHD).


The same documents revealed that Dr. Anthony Fauci knew COVID-19 vaccines were causing serious injuries within days of their rollout in December 2020.


The latest documents show vaccine-injured individuals emailed Woodcock and Marks several times throughout 2021 and 2022 with pleas for help regarding their injuries — when they claimed the vaccines were “safe and effective.”


The 300-page batch of documents released on April 21 contains correspondence between the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and people who contacted the agency about injuries they sustained after receiving a COVID-19 vaccine.


CHD requested the documents via a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request in November 2022. On April 12, 2023, CHD sued the NIH to obtain the records after the NIH failed to respond to the FOIA request.


In an October 2023 settlement, the NIH agreed to produce up to 7,500 pages of documents at a rate of 300 pages per month.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) officials Dr. Janet Woodcock, principal deputy commissioner of food and drugs and Peter Marks, M.D., Ph.D., director of the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, knew about COVID-19 vaccine injuries in early 2021, according to documents obtained by Children’s Health Defense (CHD).


The same documents revealed that Dr. Anthony Fauci knew COVID-19 vaccines were causing serious injuries within days of their rollout in December 2020.


The latest documents show vaccine-injured individuals emailed Woodcock and Marks several times throughout 2021 and 2022 with pleas for help regarding their injuries — when they claimed the vaccines were “safe and effective.”


The 300-page batch of documents released on April 21 contains correspondence between the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and people who contacted the agency about injuries they sustained after receiving a COVID-19 vaccine.


CHD requested the documents via a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request in November 2022. On April 12, 2023, CHD sued the NIH to obtain the records after the NIH failed to respond to the FOIA request.


In an October 2023 settlement, the NIH agreed to produce up to 7,500 pages of documents at a rate of 300 pages per month.
 
Last edited:

Ebionite

Well-Known Member
‘Look for graphene.’

It was examined from the point of view of optical microscopy, electron microscopy, and an ultraviolet absorbance compatibility test. Everything pointed to the fact that there was indeed graphene.


But, four months later was when we actually had access, now, to seven vials from four different brands:


AstraZeneca, Moderna, Johnson & Johnson, and Pfizer…


And he told us that if we wanted to structurally and chemically characterize the material, the Raman vibration of any material or particle was going to give with total certainty whether it is graphene or not. And a sweep was made of 110 graphene-like objects, of which, unequivocally, conclusively, 28 were graphene. And, specifically eight, reduced graphene oxide.

 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Saying what I think of your kind would probably earn me a ban.


U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) officials Dr. Janet Woodcock, principal deputy commissioner of food and drugs and Peter Marks, M.D., Ph.D., director of the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, knew about COVID-19 vaccine injuries in early 2021, according to documents obtained by Children’s Health Defense (CHD).


The same documents revealed that Dr. Anthony Fauci knew COVID-19 vaccines were causing serious injuries within days of their rollout in December 2020.


The latest documents show vaccine-injured individuals emailed Woodcock and Marks several times throughout 2021 and 2022 with pleas for help regarding their injuries — when they claimed the vaccines were “safe and effective.”


The 300-page batch of documents released on April 21 contains correspondence between the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and people who contacted the agency about injuries they sustained after receiving a COVID-19 vaccine.


CHD requested the documents via a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request in November 2022. On April 12, 2023, CHD sued the NIH to obtain the records after the NIH failed to respond to the FOIA request.


In an October 2023 settlement, the NIH agreed to produce up to 7,500 pages of documents at a rate of 300 pages per month.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) officials Dr. Janet Woodcock, principal deputy commissioner of food and drugs and Peter Marks, M.D., Ph.D., director of the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, knew about COVID-19 vaccine injuries in early 2021, according to documents obtained by Children’s Health Defense (CHD).


The same documents revealed that Dr. Anthony Fauci knew COVID-19 vaccines were causing serious injuries within days of their rollout in December 2020.


The latest documents show vaccine-injured individuals emailed Woodcock and Marks several times throughout 2021 and 2022 with pleas for help regarding their injuries — when they claimed the vaccines were “safe and effective.”


The 300-page batch of documents released on April 21 contains correspondence between the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and people who contacted the agency about injuries they sustained after receiving a COVID-19 vaccine.


CHD requested the documents via a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request in November 2022. On April 12, 2023, CHD sued the NIH to obtain the records after the NIH failed to respond to the FOIA request.


In an October 2023 settlement, the NIH agreed to produce up to 7,500 pages of documents at a rate of 300 pages per month.
And despite all those words & claims,
the epidemiological evidence shows
that the vaccines are safe & effective.
 

Ebionite

Well-Known Member
And despite all those words & claims,
the epidemiological evidence shows
that the vaccines are safe & effective.
I would stop trying to use big words if I were you.




A damning new study from some of America’s most well-respected researchers has determined that Covid mRNA shots are causing surging cases of strokes and sudden deaths.

The case study was conducted by Harvard Medical School and chronicled soaring cases of fatal cerebral ischemia over the past three years.

Cerebral ischemia is a form of deadly brain damage triggered by insufficient blood flow to the brain.

The Harvard researchers found that Moderna’s Covid mRNA injections specifically caused the recent spike in the fatal disorder.

Leading experts have been responding to the explosive study by raising the alarm about the mRNA vaccines.

The study is the latest in a long line of studies linking the shots to sudden death and potentially fatal side effects.

However, it is the first major study to specifically link Moderna’s injection to cerebral ischemia and sudden deaths.

Among those reacting to the study is Dr. John Campbell – a top British oncologist, immunologist, and immunotherapy expert.

Campbell has published a video breaking down the results of the study.

 
Last edited:

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
I think you may have confused me with some who cares about your opinion.
That's rather rude.
I don't think we're talking opinions here. We're trying to talk facts with you. We're trying to explain the scientific method to you.

Dr. Robert Redfield, the former director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), has come forward with serious allegations against health agencies, claiming they suppressed information about significant side effects of COVID-19 vaccines in younger populations.


According to Dr. Redfield, the potential risks associated with the vaccines were deliberately downplayed, which has led to severe health complications for some individuals.


During a televised discussion with Chris Cuomo, a COVID vaccine-injured himself, Dr. Redfield expressed his concerns about the lack of transparency from major public health institutions such as the NIH, FDA, and CDC.



Dr. Redfield suggested the establishment of an independent review commission, akin to the post-9/11 commission, to thoroughly investigate the decisions made during the pandemic across both the previous and current administrations.
Where can we read his peer reviewed paper on the subject?
 

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
‘Look for graphene.’

It was examined from the point of view of optical microscopy, electron microscopy, and an ultraviolet absorbance compatibility test. Everything pointed to the fact that there was indeed graphene.


But, four months later was when we actually had access, now, to seven vials from four different brands:


AstraZeneca, Moderna, Johnson & Johnson, and Pfizer…


And he told us that if we wanted to structurally and chemically characterize the material, the Raman vibration of any material or particle was going to give with total certainty whether it is graphene or not. And a sweep was made of 110 graphene-like objects, of which, unequivocally, conclusively, 28 were graphene. And, specifically eight, reduced graphene oxide.


Again, you really, really, really need to vet your sources more carefully. Especially if you're going to go around telling everyone else they're stupid and/or ignorant, as you cling to absurd conspiracy theories.
 

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
I would stop trying to use big words if I were you.




A damning new study from some of America’s most well-respected researchers has determined that Covid mRNA shots are causing surging cases of strokes and sudden deaths.

The case study was conducted by Harvard Medical School and chronicled soaring cases of fatal cerebral ischemia over the past three years.

Cerebral ischemia is a form of deadly brain damage triggered by insufficient blood flow to the brain.

The Harvard researchers found that Moderna’s Covid mRNA injections specifically caused the recent spike in the fatal disorder.

Leading experts have been responding to the explosive study by raising the alarm about the mRNA vaccines.

The study is the latest in a long line of studies linking the shots to sudden death and potentially fatal side effects.

However, it is the first major study to specifically link Moderna’s injection to cerebral ischemia and sudden deaths.

Among those reacting to the study is Dr. John Campbell – a top British oncologist, immunologist, and immunotherapy expert.

Campbell has published a video breaking down the results of the study.

This is a case study of one person, which concludes:

"The diffuse endothelial damage and vessel wall inflammation seen on pathology suggested an underlying pro-thrombotic state and T cell inflammatory response. A number of case reports have demonstrated cerebral venous sinus thrombosis and systemic thromboses post-COVID-19 vaccination.1-3 While this patient did not have CVST, CVST has been previously associated with COVID-19 vaccination1-3 where thrombocytopenia is frequent and termed ‘vaccine-induced prothrombotic immune thrombocytopenia’ (VIPIT). VIPIT is similar to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) with antibodies directed against platelet factor 4 (PF4).1,4,5 Mild thrombocytopenia occurred in this case, but PF4 antibodies were negative. The arterial infarct in this case is likely related to a pro-thrombotic state but with a different underlying mechanism to that seen in venous thrombosis. Due to the large volume of infarction, the patient was not started on anticoagulation after extensive discussion of the risks vs potential benefit.

In summary, administration of COVID-19 vaccine was considered a possible cause of the extensive multifocal arterial thromboses with associated inflammatory response and elevated intracranial pressure given the temporal association. The mechanism for initial elevation in intracranial pressure is not known but may relate to cerebral autoregulatory changes in the setting of cortical microvascular thrombosis. Review of the medical literature and vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) produced no similar cases, suggesting the condition is extremely rare, but a potentially fatal vaccine-associated event."

 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I would stop trying to use big words if I were you.




A damning new study from some of America’s most well-respected researchers has determined that Covid mRNA shots are causing surging cases of strokes and sudden deaths.

The case study was conducted by Harvard Medical School and chronicled soaring cases of fatal cerebral ischemia over the past three years.

Cerebral ischemia is a form of deadly brain damage triggered by insufficient blood flow to the brain.

The Harvard researchers found that Moderna’s Covid mRNA injections specifically caused the recent spike in the fatal disorder.

Leading experts have been responding to the explosive study by raising the alarm about the mRNA vaccines.

The study is the latest in a long line of studies linking the shots to sudden death and potentially fatal side effects.

However, it is the first major study to specifically link Moderna’s injection to cerebral ischemia and sudden deaths.

Among those reacting to the study is Dr. John Campbell – a top British oncologist, immunologist, and immunotherapy expert.

Campbell has published a video breaking down the results of the study.

I notice that you cite problems, but that you
never compare mortality & morbidity frequencies
of vaccination vs non-vaccination.
Every medical procedure has deleterious side effects.
My mother in law died from heart surgery. Does this
mean heart surgery is bad? No, just risky...far more
so than vaccination. I know many people who survived
such imminent certain death because of such surgery.

In short....
Complaining about rare side effects,
& ignoring benefits is specious.
 
Last edited:

Ebionite

Well-Known Member
Big words are fine when used correctly.
They weren't used correctly - epidemiological is not the same as imaginary.

Dr John Campbell isn't an oncologist or immunologist.
So what? It doesn't take a specialist to recognize a general pattern of harm.


The mRNA used in the COVID-19 vaccines has been modified from its naturally occurring form to prevent degradation by the immune system when injected. In a review published on April 5, researchers argue that modification—specifically, N1-methyl-pseudouridine modification—to mRNA causes immune suppression that may contribute to cancer development.
 

lewisnotmiller

Grand Hat
Staff member
Premium Member
They weren't used correctly - epidemiological is not the same as imaginary.

Opinionative. The word was used correctly, you disagree with his position.

So what? It doesn't take a specialist to recognize a general pattern of harm.

Hey, you're the one making false claims that are apparently not required. You'd need to ask you why you felt the need to.

None of which changes the irony in you calling out people over the misuse of big words.
 

Ebionite

Well-Known Member
Opinionative.
No, facts about the definition of epidemiology are inconsistent with claims based on imaginatiion.


Blood contaminated with prion-like structures from the spike protein raises the risk of inducing fatal neurodegenerative diseases in recipients. The potential transmission of harmful proteins through exosomes ("shedding") and the risk of autoimmune diseases due to the vaccines' mechanism and components like lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) are other major concerns

...

The researchers advocate for comprehensive testing of both jabbed and unjabbed individuals to assess the safety of blood products and suggest discarding blood products contaminated with spike proteins or modified mRNA until effective removal methods have been developed
 

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
No, facts about the definition of epidemiology are inconsistent with claims based on imaginatiion.


Blood contaminated with prion-like structures from the spike protein raises the risk of inducing fatal neurodegenerative diseases in recipients. The potential transmission of harmful proteins through exosomes ("shedding") and the risk of autoimmune diseases due to the vaccines' mechanism and components like lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) are other major concerns

...

The researchers advocate for comprehensive testing of both jabbed and unjabbed individuals to assess the safety of blood products and suggest discarding blood products contaminated with spike proteins or modified mRNA until effective removal methods have been developed
Yet another trash source.

You're really on a roll here.
 

Ebionite

Well-Known Member
The Inquiry’s Findings So Far. The Scottish COVID-19 Inquiry, an independent investigation, has been meticulously examining the country’s response to the pandemic. As testimonies pile up, a disturbing pattern emerges. The inquiry is not just about identifying failures; it’s about uncovering possible criminal actions.

Evidence suggests that these euthanasia practices were not isolated incidents but part of a broader strategy. Documents and internal communications obtained by the inquiry point to a coordinated effort to boost COVID-19 death statistics. The motive? Speculation ranges from financial incentives tied to pandemic relief funds to a more insidious desire to maintain public fear and compliance.

The Drug Cocktail. Central to the whistleblowers’ testimonies is the use of specific drug combinations. These drugs, typically used in palliative care to ease suffering, were allegedly administered in doses high enough to cause death. One former pharmacist testified that the orders for these drugs spiked during the pandemic’s peak, raising red flags about their intended use.

Medical experts brought in by the inquiry confirmed that the dosages described by the whistleblowers were indeed lethal.


 

mikkel_the_dane

My own religion
The Inquiry’s Findings So Far. The Scottish COVID-19 Inquiry, an independent investigation, has been meticulously examining the country’s response to the pandemic. As testimonies pile up, a disturbing pattern emerges. The inquiry is not just about identifying failures; it’s about uncovering possible criminal actions.

Evidence suggests that these euthanasia practices were not isolated incidents but part of a broader strategy. Documents and internal communications obtained by the inquiry point to a coordinated effort to boost COVID-19 death statistics. The motive? Speculation ranges from financial incentives tied to pandemic relief funds to a more insidious desire to maintain public fear and compliance.

The Drug Cocktail. Central to the whistleblowers’ testimonies is the use of specific drug combinations. These drugs, typically used in palliative care to ease suffering, were allegedly administered in doses high enough to cause death. One former pharmacist testified that the orders for these drugs spiked during the pandemic’s peak, raising red flags about their intended use.

Medical experts brought in by the inquiry confirmed that the dosages described by the whistleblowers were indeed lethal.



I mean yes, I trust that site when I read this on the page you linked:
"Bombshell! Playing God: The Elites’ Sinister and Dystopian Master Plan to Achieve Immortality by Stealing Your Body and Enslaving Humanity (Must See Video)"
But you don't really understand how deep it goes. You are already enslaved as a brain in a vat and your body is already stolen. Didn't you know that?
 
Last edited:

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
I mean yes, I trust that site when I read this on the page you linked:
"Bombshell! Playing God: The Elites’ Sinister and Dystopian Master Plan to Achieve Immortality by Stealing Your Body and Enslaving Humanity (Must See Video)"
But you don't really understaND how deep it goes. You are already ensLaved as a brain in a vat and your body is already stolen. Didn't you know that?
LOL Did you see the FEMA CAMP TERROR ad down the side of the page?





Apparently some people will just believe anything they read on the internet.
 

Ebionite

Well-Known Member

Doctors Fareed and Tyson have collectively treated 20,000 COVID cases with no deaths. Do you know why it's not in the peer-reviewed literature?​


They submitted it to medical journals who all refused to publish it. The reason given: because they didn’t get IRB approval for the retrospective analysis of the data.


 

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member

Doctors Fareed and Tyson have collectively treated 20,000 COVID cases with no deaths. Do you know why it's not in the peer-reviewed literature?​


They submitted it to medical journals who all refused to publish it. The reason given: because they didn’t get IRB approval for the retrospective analysis of the data.


Actually, it's because they used drugs cocktails like ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine (plus many others) that were not FDA approved to treat COVID.




Wonderful amazing doctors who refused to even wear masks during a global pandemic. :rolleyes:

"Yet some of the more controversial treatments Fareed and Tyson have prescribed over the course of the pandemic are those drugs not authorized by the FDA for use in COVID treatment, such as hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, among other treatments. Other treatment have included a host of anti-inflammatories, anticoagulants, antivirals, antibiotics, oxygen, and steroid treatments.

Where the doctors further deviate from conventional medicine is their continued assertion that masks and vaccines are harmful, two pillars of the medical and public health communities’ messaging on COVID protection.

To that end, part of Fareed’s presentation stated COVID is only spread when symptoms are present, that natural immunity is “one and done,” and that the vaccines are not safe for the public."


 

lewisnotmiller

Grand Hat
Staff member
Premium Member
No, facts about the definition of epidemiology are inconsistent with claims based on imaginatiion.


Blood contaminated with prion-like structures from the spike protein raises the risk of inducing fatal neurodegenerative diseases in recipients. The potential transmission of harmful proteins through exosomes ("shedding") and the risk of autoimmune diseases due to the vaccines' mechanism and components like lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) are other major concerns

...

The researchers advocate for comprehensive testing of both jabbed and unjabbed individuals to assess the safety of blood products and suggest discarding blood products contaminated with spike proteins or modified mRNA until effective removal methods have been developed

I'm not that interested in the science/pseudo-science, honestly.
More just found the language and positioning interesting and ironic.
 
Top