The Sum of Awe
Brought to you by the moment that spacetime began.
Yeah, I'll admit, I'm still a seeker. I had two people say I change my religious views too much. I tried Satanism for a couple of days, then I found out I'm definitely not one hehehe.
I don't know, if you do mind me always asking you can ignore me, sorry I'm a pest to you, but I guess it's a need.
This time I'm looking philosophically though, religion is less important to me now.
Basically, I think we can do things without moderation without them becoming attachable or if they hurt an innocent (only innocent) person.
I know I don't put my will before everyone's will though, it depends on which one is more logical. Let's say if I were to kill my parents and save 2 million people, my will would be to save my parents and let 2 million die, but it is more logical to let 2 million people live so I would do that instead.
I don't believe moderation is necessary to avoid attachment. I believe you can do a thing you love a number of times, but realize there is more things besides just that.
Innocent people are nice people or people that never really gotten anything even if they haven't really given anything.
Innocent can be anyone up to the point where they harmed you or a person you love. Basically it is someone you can depend on or have never had problems with.
I am indeed majorly against Abrahamic Religions if that matters, but I do not harm a religious person, but do not mind harming the religion itself.
Such as that^ if that matters.
I also think we shouldn't harm/kill nonhuman animals unless for food or if they are a threat. If you are going to ask me about testing, I have nothing against it but believe it would be wiser since it is human medicine to test it on a human, it'll get more accuracy anyways.
I don't know, if you do mind me always asking you can ignore me, sorry I'm a pest to you, but I guess it's a need.
This time I'm looking philosophically though, religion is less important to me now.
Basically, I think we can do things without moderation without them becoming attachable or if they hurt an innocent (only innocent) person.
I know I don't put my will before everyone's will though, it depends on which one is more logical. Let's say if I were to kill my parents and save 2 million people, my will would be to save my parents and let 2 million die, but it is more logical to let 2 million people live so I would do that instead.
I don't believe moderation is necessary to avoid attachment. I believe you can do a thing you love a number of times, but realize there is more things besides just that.
Innocent people are nice people or people that never really gotten anything even if they haven't really given anything.
Innocent can be anyone up to the point where they harmed you or a person you love. Basically it is someone you can depend on or have never had problems with.
I am indeed majorly against Abrahamic Religions if that matters, but I do not harm a religious person, but do not mind harming the religion itself.
Strict taxation of all churchesIf churches were taxed for all their income and property, theyd crumble overnight of their own obsolescence, and the National Debt would be wiped out as quickly. The productive, the creative, the resourceful should be subsidized. So long as the useless and incompetent are getting paid, they should be heavily taxed.
Such as that^ if that matters.
I also think we shouldn't harm/kill nonhuman animals unless for food or if they are a threat. If you are going to ask me about testing, I have nothing against it but believe it would be wiser since it is human medicine to test it on a human, it'll get more accuracy anyways.