See, here's the thing. You can't really discriminate soley on the basis of "religious leader" because one would have to have some kind of proof of that. Someone who may be a "religious leader" to some may not be to others. Some households consider the father to be the automatic "religious leader" of the family. Or how about an unordained High Priestess of a coven? How do you determine who is and is not a "religious leader" unless you use a legal criteria of ordainment? And if you use ordainment, then are discriminating against such a wide variety of people. People that may have nothing else in common except for that peice of paper. Christians, Wiccans, Druids, Native American Shamans, Pantheists, Panentheists, and yes, even atheists can all be ordained. They can all have different reasons for seeking ordainment as well. So how can one possibly try to lump them all together and make them all fit into a tiny box and THEN try to deny them something based on your definition of what that box means? You can't. It simply doesn't hold up.