cardero
Citizen Mod
Hold on, we're not done yet.Mister_T said:Learned much have I. Thanks for the input everyone.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Hold on, we're not done yet.Mister_T said:Learned much have I. Thanks for the input everyone.
Actually I believe that marriage was instituted by God.Dayv said:Marriage is man-made, animals don't marry. The bible was written by people with the viewpoints of those people at that time, and people probably married before the bible was written although with their own ideas and ceremonies which they had created.
Then how would you explain marriages that happened prior to Christianity and/or among people who don't even believe in the Christian God?beckysoup61 said:Actually I believe that marriage was instituted by God.
Then we can agree to disagree, and I appreciate the designation 'Good Captain'.Sunstone said:I believe the comparison is valid...
...and when the sex isn't exciting anymore, one of both of you will probably stray and your marriage may break up again. I hope that doesn't happen, but for a relationship based on sex, it would be a logical resolution.Ðanisty said:...If you doubt the importance of sex in a relationship, consider that my husband and I broke up once (for about a month due to family problems) before we were married and got back together because we missed the sex....
Well, it is your choice to lead a morally bankrupt lifestyle as it is for the women who are not committed to their marriages. Just be aware that in many states, a spouse who catches his/her spouse in the act of adultery will not be convicted for committing a 'crime of passion'. Like Larry the Cable Guy says 'Guns don't kill people, husbands who come home early do.'Faint said:...I was just thinking about several young married women I've slept with...
Lots of interesting viewpoints on this topic, but I find this the most interesting. Since we don't have a link to the exact numbers, let's assume the majority that favor abstinence is 51%. That means that at least 41% of Americans advocate an action that is contrary to the action they took, waiting until marriage. I would say this lends credence to my earlier point that pre-marital sex was a mistake for more people than it was a positive.Sunstone said:...It is interesting in light of this discussion that polls have shown 90% of all married Americans engaged in pre-marital sex. Only 10% choose to abstain until marriage. Perhaps oddly, the same polls show that a majority of Americans favor abstinence until marriage, at least in theory...
Wow..you even learned to talk like Yoda. Take care and make the right decision.Mister_T said:Learned much have I. Thanks for the input everyone.
So a stat you made up is now lending your argument credence? You're not even trying anymore.captainxeroid said:Since we don't have a link to the exact numbers, let's assume the majority that favor abstinence is 51%. That means that at least 41% of Americans advocate an action that is contrary to the action they took, waiting until marriage. I would say this lends credence to my earlier point that pre-marital sex was a mistake for more people than it was a positive.
First of all, my relationship isn't based on sex. We have a fantastic relationship. He's my best friend. Also, our marriage didn't break up. We broke up when we were dating before we got married and it didn't have anything to do with our relationship. It was about his family. I already said this. You make a lot of assumptions....and when the sex isn't exciting anymore, one of both of you will probably stray and your marriage may break up again. I hope that doesn't happen, but for a relationship based on sex, it would be a logical resolution.
Marriage was there from the beginning. Christians believe humanity began with Adam and Eve and that they were married. God's laws existed prior to Christianity, Christianity was just an extension or addition of the previous laws.Ðanisty said:Then how would you explain marriages that happened prior to Christianity and/or among people who don't even believe in the Christian God?
Actually it was inaugurated by God's wife.beckysoup61 said:Actually I believe that marriage was instituted by God.
Glad I could help. Don't expect this thread to stop going any time soon though. People have lots of opinions, and usually it's hard to convince someone else of anything different.Mister_T said:Learned much have I. Thanks for the input everyone.
And people who don't follow Christianity...what about their marriages? What about marriages that may have taken place in, for example, ancient Greece? What about modern marriages in non-Christian religions or marriages without any religion?nutshell said:Marriage was there from the beginning. Christians believe humanity began with Adam and Eve and that they were married. God's laws existed prior to Christianity, Christianity was just an extension or addition of the previous laws.
and you are not even trying to pay attenion:biglaugh: . Sunstone posted those stats, and since you did not disagree with my conclusion, it would appear that either you did not understand it or despite your wishes that I am wrong, dep down you do realize I am correct. You are the one who needs to try better in the future.mr.guy said:So a stat you made up is now lending your argument credence? You're not even trying anymore.
[font=Trebuchet MS said:Ðanisty
OK...partially my bad. I'll grant that it did happen before you were married, but YOU posted that the reason you got back together was 'because we missed the sex'. Therefore, the conclusion that your relationship is disproportionately based on sex remains valid, and despite experience that relationship so founded are inherently unstable, I do wish you and your husband long-term happiness.[/font][font=Trebuchet MS said:]consider that my husband and I broke up once...got back together because we missed the sex
Use your imagination! More on topic, I honestly think that pre-marital sex should be compulsory. That would diminish the number of marriages failing due to bed incompatibility.Captain xeroid said:Anders, I believe Jeffrey was speaking of how he would react as an angry papa to the young man:help: who was trying to have pre-marital sex with Jeffrey's daughter and not about incest.anders said:Would serve you right, according to today's views...
Oy. I deserve that.CaptainXeroid said:and you are not even trying to pay attenion:biglaugh: . Sunstone posted those stats,...
I might sooner say that the subset of the so-called remorseful are hypocrites. Furthermore, it doesn't necessarily mean they're admitting to a mistake, just that they want their kids to do otherwise.That means that at least 41% of Americans advocate an action that is contrary to the action they took, waiting until marriage. I would say this lends credence to my earlier point that pre-marital sex was a mistake for more people than it was a positive.
Nutshell answered it for me. Thanks!! Exactly, or pretty close to what I was going to say.nutshell said:Marriage was there from the beginning. Christians believe humanity began with Adam and Eve and that they were married. God's laws existed prior to Christianity, Christianity was just an extension or addition of the previous laws.
We are just saying that we believe that marriage was institued, created, established, etc., by God.Ðanisty said:And people who don't follow Christianity...what about their marriages? What about marriages that may have taken place in, for example, ancient Greece? What about modern marriages in non-Christian religions or marriages without any religion?
Are you insane?anders said:Use your imagination! More on topic, I honestly think that pre-marital sex should be compulsory. That would diminish the number of marriages failing due to bed incompatibility.
angellous_evangellous said:Are you insane?
Sex is a wild universe. Perhaps everyone should be forced to have homosexual, heterosexual, and threesome sex before graduating high school. Sex toys would not be optional - no sense in having conservative sex. Group sex with butt plugs!! :jam:
I made this point earlier in the thread, they are not hypocrites. Some one got stuck on that word mistake, and off we went. They are teachers who are trying to help others learn from their mistakes. If they didn't consider what they did a mistake, they would advocate others do as they had done. If you burn your hand on a hot stove and warn someone of the dangers of touching it, that doesn't make you a hypocrite.mr.guy said:I might sooner say that the subset of the so-called remorseful are hypocrites. Furthermore, it doesn't necessarily mean they're admitting to a mistake, just that they want their kids to do otherwise.
anders said:
On the surface, this seems to make sense, but a quick examination of the results reveals it doesn't work that way. Instead, couples that engage in pre-marial sex are more likely to cheat and eventually split up rather than working out their differences in the bedroom. I realize many factors influence the divorce rate, but nobody can argue that divorce rates have skyrocketed as more couples have pre-marital sex.anders said:More on topic, I honestly think that pre-marital sex should be compulsory. That would diminish the number of marriages failing due to bed incompatibility.