Please read what I wrote again.
Religions have had nothing to do with that. For example, the movements to abolish legal slavery and to give women and homosexuals equal rights are not supported by the sacred texts of religion.
My examples, referring to the sacred texts, should tell you that I am referring to the doctrine, the teachings, of religions.
We humans, religious or not, have a conscience which guides us morally. So, when, say Catholics, make moral progress we ask: "Was their progress due to their religious teachings or because their conscience moved them to become better people?"
The movement to abolish slavery in the world started to gain momentum in about 1700. Yet a century and a half later, in 1866, the Catholic pope wrote that he could find nothing in "divine law" opposed to the buying, selling or trading of slaves. And, according to his Bible, he was right. But lay Catholics, being human and owning a conscience, favored the abolition of slavery anyway.
So, you can give religious groups credit for organizing charities. But when you do that you aren't making a valid counter-point to my argument that the sacred texts of religion have had no influence (neither positive nor negative) on humanity's moral progress.