I'd take my chances with a robot judge over a human any day, so long as it was programmed not to be biased.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I'd take my chances with a robot judge over a human any day, so long as it was programmed not to be biased.
Stability....I see meta-chaos.The art world debated on if a signed urinal counts as art or not. That world has heavily shunned and even in some places banned AI art.
The legal world, as a necessity of its function and stability, is more conservative than the art world.
Unless the robot has lasers....Ultimately I just don't see a robot having great lawyer potential. Ideally it would, but great lawyers are great bull****ers and some of the absurdities that have gotten someone acquitted a robot just isn't going to be able to do.
And with trials, and definitely I'd rather have Kirk defending me than Spock. Spock would no doubt know every in and out of the case and how to correctly view and apply things but he'd lose the jury. Kirk would be getting as close to a sexual relationship with the lady jurors as he's legally allowed to have. That wins juror cases, not hard logic.
Wonder how much robotico makes an hour?Not all that ready to replace lawyers,
despite the ambitions of its creator.
World's first 'robot lawyer' will be defending a human in court next month
0.01 quatloosWonder how much robotico makes an hour?
That already exists with COMPAS. Humans just rubber stamp whatever it decides.