Is victim prejudicial? They were shot, i e. Victims of shooting.
Its not like they were unlucky and just walked into the bullet, Rittenhouse was aiming to kill his victims
If someone attacks you with deadly intent, & you
kill them in self defense, then you are the victim
(or would've been), not the attacker. This could
be the judge's perspective.
Many have already judged Rittenhouse guilty, &
want the trial conducted in a manner to assure
conviction. I understand why the judge's ruling
offends them. Alas, our system doesn't serve them.