Something that I wonder about - and I'm hoping that I'm wrong - is whether this will further advantage Christianity.
I mean, large employers like the USPS will generally have plenty of Mon-Fri jobs that never get scheduled on a Sunday, so transferring someone to one of those jobs may very well be a "de minimis" action.
OTOH, how many jobs do they have with schedules that let an employee consistently be available for Muslim prayer times on Friday? I would guess that the work to carve out a space for a non-Christian religious employee would often be significantly more to the point where an employer could argue that the burden is unreasonable.
... all because we've set up our society to cater to Christianity alone, by and large.
Say we required all teachers; company employees, to teach on Sundays. They are exempt from working on Sundays. How did they get this exemption, which is still sold as a taboo for anyone with a religious need? There are about 4,000,000 teachers who get this accommodation. The teachers formed a union and used that to leverage what they want.
The teachers still get the entire summer off, with pay, in this day and age. Imagine if some Religions needed the summer off with pay. The Left would be in an uproar, but they will defend the teachers; part of their team. Teachers union were even given the power to screw their customers; students, out of an in-person education; up north, during COVID. It turned out children were not that vulnerable to COVID, as a group. This move was not for the children. The lockdown excuse was also not really needed, as sold, since the hard data showed the same health results, as no lockdown; teachers still taught in person in Florida and had similar health affects.
Religion accommodation can also be done via the free market. Government was used in the Teacher's Union case, via campaign donations to shady Lefty politicians. Since the Government has handcuffs, with respect to the 1st Amendment, religious accommodation will be less harsh on business, since a union cannot pay off politicians the same way; conflict of interests.
Since the Government and all its employees have handcuffs in terms of religion, and since one can lose their job for bad mouthing minorities, women, LBGTQ, etc., should Government employees be fired for doing the same to religion? Religion is the only true Constitutional handcuff for all government employees; agents of Congress who sign off on all checks. What is enforced is free speech censorship, which is being violated by the government and its agents. The system is quite messed up and needs lots of house cleaning. What we see is what happens when law favors crooks.
I am working under the assumption that law was originally designed for the good of the people, and not just for the advantages of a small group of crooks. If Law is being made to protect crooks, then law has finally become obsolete, since it no longer serves its original use for good, but has become a tool for crooks.
For example, Nixon's staff during 1972, broke into the Democrats headquarters at the Watergate Hotel before the 1972 Presidential election. This is still seen as one of the worse corruption scandals in US history. This led to the impeachment of Nixon and jail time for those who broke in and covered up.
Fast forward to 2026, President Obama and VP Biden did the same with the Trump Towers in 2016. They actually outdid Nixon by using the CIA and FBI; used professional spooks, to wire tap, place spies inside Trump Tower. Where was the Nixon trial, impeachment and possible prison? The laws that went after Nixon were ignored. This is a good example of law being used to protect bad behavior that had previously been defined as criminal for Nixon. Technically, Biden should have been disqualified from running for president in 2020, because of the Trump Gate spy scandal. Law was used to allow crooks to escape the first round of justice and then allowed to prosper. Law may quite well be at the end of its ropes. It is not longer used just for good.
As far as daily prayers, for Christians, Muslims and others, since the Federal Government is handcuffed and cannot stop religion, peaceful assembly and free speech, by law, anywhere in the Public or Private sector, the compromise is to use private time, in both sectors, such as lunch and breaks, as a flex time slot for such things. Everyone can benefit. One can have lunch, pray or both.
In schools, we can teach world religions, as an elective subject, like we do woman and minority studies. Al three have been subject to discrimination at one time or another. Freedom of Religion came about due to a long history of religious persecution. This gives a time slot for all the birds of a feather, to assemble and to collectively worship and/or enjoy their collective accomplishments, while praying for those who repressed you.