• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Republican says groups spreading "white supremacist garbage" not welcome in VA

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Yes, but the white supremacist is the one labeled garbage.

If the NAACP were attending, would he call them out as spreading black supremacist garbage? The NAACP has been supporting these additional gun laws. Did any one label them as black supremacist garbage?

And of course it should be asked, does the white garbage (trash) have a right to be there? Does the NAAWP have a right to be there?

Good-Ole-Rebel
The NAACP does not support "black supremacist garbage". I know this may be hard to understand but supporting equal rights for black people is not supporting black supremacism.
 

Darkforbid

Well-Known Member
I wish "mass shooter" would stop being used.

Use "public random armed violent attack(er)" instead.

a PRAVA (PRAY-vuh)

This covers everything from one or more victims and
everything
used as a weapon to boot from guns to moving trucks.

The important point is at least one person is hurt or killed in a PRAVA and the PRAVA didn't know the victim nor was the PRAVA targeting any one or more individuals specifically.

If somebody commits first-degree murder against a specific person, usually in private and the victim is usually known to the perpetrator, it's just an ordinary crime.


I agree strongly. Unarmed public events draw PRAVAs like a magnet.

What I shouldn't use the accepted term because you don't like it?
 

Good-Ole-Rebel

Well-Known Member
Just so we understand, are you yourself a white supremacist?

Do you not agree that white supremacists are scum?

I am white. I am proud of the white race achievements in the world. Seems they have excelled very well. Seems all the immigration's are from the third world countries to the white civilization. Does that make them 'sucm'?

Good-Ole-Rebel
 

Good-Ole-Rebel

Well-Known Member
The NAACP does not support "black supremacist garbage". I know this may be hard to understand but supporting equal rights for black people is not supporting black supremacism.

Equality went out the window along time ago. They don't want equality. They want affirmative action. Better known as 'preferential treatment'.

NAACP is about advancing the black people. NAAWP is about advancing the white people. But, only one is considered racist.

Good-Ole-Rebel
 

Guitar's Cry

Disciple of Pan
I am white. I am proud of the white race achievements in the world. Seems they have excelled very well. Seems all the immigration's are from the third world countries to the white civilization. Does that make them 'sucm'?

Good-Ole-Rebel

I am white. I am proud of my amount of melanin, which shows the distance my ancestors lived from the equator. They excelled well living so far north! My melanin content makes me a superior being to those with obscene amounts of melanin, what with their ancestry being so much closer to the equator than mine.

(Note: I am indulging in sarcasm.)
 

Jonathan Bailey

Well-Known Member
I suspect it is because they are from the same (and only) subspecies of modern human, Homo sapiens. Being of the same species, they share all the general characteristics of that species.

Homo sapiens has many cosmetic variations, namely facial features.

Both bloodhounds and German shepherd dogs are both Canis lupus familiaris. The human species is Homo sapiens. Caucasoid, Mongoloid and Negroid are subspecies with distinct facial features and some variation in hair texture and skull profile. The Caucasoid "race" (and particularly those originating in western Europe) is the most handsome subspecies within Homo sapiens.

Using dog breeds as relative degrees of attractiveness as an analogy:

German Shepherd = Caucasoid
Bloodhound = Negroid
Pug = Mongoloid
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
I read somewhere...….I think it was the Rifleman magazine

Hitler wrote gun law registration
which …...almost word for word...….
bears resemblance to gun laws here
Of course the socialists don't have an original plan or thought to their name. They take from everybody else's play book.

Gun legislation isn't any different.

I love the Godwin stuff.
 

Cooky

Veteran Member
The dark complexion and often the beards or mustaches.
Actually, many Hispanics have more handsome faces especially when they are clean-shaven and their hair isn't too long.

I think it's because the Muslim Moores ruled Spain for 700 years, and blended with the Spanish, and then the Spanish Conquistadores were direct descents of the original conquers of Spain.

So I think they're close cousins, except the Latinos have Native American in them.
 

Darkforbid

Well-Known Member
Homo sapiens has many cosmetic variations, namely facial features.

Both bloodhounds and German shepherd dogs are both Canis lupus familiaris. The human species is Homo sapiens. Caucasoid, Mongoloid and Negroid are subspecies with distinct facial features and some variation in hair texture and skull profile. The Caucasoid "race" (and particularly those originating in western Europe) is the most handsome subspecies within Homo sapiens.

Using dog breeds as relative degrees of attractiveness as an analogy:

German Shepherd = Caucasoid
Bloodhound = Negroid
Pug = Mongoloid

Maybe and only maybe. You could get away with that on a science board talking about historical human classifications

Anywhere else

You're just being a c**t
 

Cooky

Veteran Member
Homo sapiens has many cosmetic variations, namely facial features.

Both bloodhounds and German shepherd dogs are both Canis lupus familiaris. The human species is Homo sapiens. Caucasoid, Mongoloid and Negroid are subspecies with distinct facial features and some variation in hair texture and skull profile. The Caucasoid "race" (and particularly those originating in western Europe) is the most handsome subspecies within Homo sapiens.

Using dog breeds as relative degrees of attractiveness as an analogy:

German Shepherd = Caucasoid
Bloodhound = Negroid
Pug = Mongoloid

With birds:
Raven = Negroid
Owl = Mongoloid
Eagle = Caucasoid

...Latinos and Arabs are both hawks.
 

Jonathan Bailey

Well-Known Member
Maybe and only maybe. You could get away with that on a science board talking about historical human classifications

Anywhere else

You're just being a c**t

I see man as yet another member of the animal kingdom. I look at the biology and taxonomy of man scientifically, yes. People vary in facial features the way dogs vary in facial features. Some people have attractive features to some and unattractive features to others. Personally, I think the faces of Holstein cows are much more handsome than the faces of Hereford cattle.
 

Jonathan Bailey

Well-Known Member
With birds:
Raven, Buzzard (Vulture) = Negroid
Owl, Penguin = Mongoloid
Eagle = Caucasoid

...Latinos and Arabs are both hawks.

I'd also give Caucasoid pheasants, doves and peacocks for beauty.

Latinos have much more handsome noses than Arabs/Semites/Assyrians

Which birds have HOOKED bills, give those to middle-easterners.
 

ImmortalFlame

Woke gremlin
Equality went out the window along time ago. They don't want equality. They want affirmative action. Better known as 'preferential treatment'.
Er, no. Affirmative action is specifically a response AGAINST racial inequality.

NAACP is about advancing the black people. NAAWP is about advancing the white people. But, only one is considered racist.
And do you understand why that is?

One seeks to raise black people up from positions of inequality into a position of equality.

The other seeks to raise white people above other races and the advancement of white-ethno states that actively discriminate against people they deem to be of a "lesser" race.

Equating the two is absurd.
 

Darkforbid

Well-Known Member
I see man as yet another member of the animal kingdom. I look at the biology and taxonomy of man scientifically, yes. People vary in facial features the way dogs vary in facial features. Some people have attractive features to some and unattractive features to others. Personally, I think the faces of Holstein cows are much more handsome than the faces of Hereford cattle.

Google scientific racism:

'After the end of World War II, scientific racism in theory and action was formally denounced, especially in UNESCO's early antiracist statement "The Race Question" (1950): "The biological fact of race and the myth of 'race' should be distinguished. For all practical social purposes 'race' is not so much a biological phenomenon as a social myth. The myth of 'race' has created an enormous amount of human and social damage. In recent years, it has taken a heavy toll in human lives, and caused untold suffering'
 
Top